Member Info for Dustyslay

Scooby my area isn't too bad, we seem to get a fair bit of investment into areas that have massively benefitted, it's a pleasure to see. Areas that was once shabby and ok, now pleasurable through simple green initiatives and adding these recycling bin options in those areas, it's like people enjoy to see it, and will gladly take part in keeping it something good in their life.

So unfortunately you keep slowly depriving areas, and raising taxes on their life. It's backwards I'm afraid

Finally, scooby gets it!!! Missed you buddy.

Your last sentence summed up my argument, but don't agree, just frigging tax the lot of them.

Making Fat Janet getting her shopping from aldi and paying a quid for her bag, isn't going to turn her into an environmentalist that's for sure.

Our country's MO, is tax, not incentive

I pretty doubt he envisaged this when creating the company with a mission to bring a product like this, along with some leading men in those fields to the market. But it's here now, let's see if he can live up to that hefty salary and get the job done. His work history seems to be centered around US based firms, so perhaps he sees that as a more optimum market and why they are patented there also. Its a waiting game, its been a tough 12 months, for the company and shareholders. I too had a higher average till recently, I would expect anyone smart enough and invested in 60p shares, will be watching moves very closely

No I agree with the smoking part of the conversation, certainly went a way to improving health. Although vaping among youths has become an even worse pandemic than kids smoking cigarettes, they are easily attainable and high in choice and a lot knockoffs from China. So I'd say its exasperated the situation, and what's even worse, its mainly all cheap unrecycle plastic in the hands of youth. So once again, on a bigger picture the argument then collapses on itself, as kids just chuck them once finished.

But I agree, social responsibility needs to play a massive part in it all, but I believe higher taxes and drifting towards lower standards of living will only exasperate the issue further.

Unfortunately we are so far down the rabbit hole that these studies on social and societal economics won't apply here and only get implemented in countries like Dubia, or Singapore or places like Norway where living conditions give opportunity for these studies to breath.

Us, we just add tax. The pinnacle of stupidity, keep doing the same practices, and expecting new results

It's looking like I'm officially a LTH for life 👍

Unfortunately, not by choice

Well I was talking to DrAl, so you over exercised your right.

But go on, have the last word I know you need that to close up on, but make it a goodun please........

I'm currently at 10.8p so right about now, I'd bite the hand off 9p!!

Looking at his history, his part positions, the team in place with huge backgrounds in the science behind these products.

He will hit that 9p, he won't miss those paychecks

We doing this then Red? Back and forth Baloney?

I'll leave it here, its not worth it is it?

Agree to disagree and let's move on, as I get the sense you and I could go a while

Burrows had messed this up, but I like that although he is in charge his expertise still very much lies in the product, he is a PHD, among a bunch of other titles so its he isn't just an ex head of marketing at some fancy previous job, it's just as much his life's work too. So I'm sure he will feel this as much as any, but I'm sure his high salary helps that burden.

Oh totally agree, and unfortunately Burrows isn't that either and the guy he hired in from the states was a no show for months, took a personal at perhaps the worst time. So i feel for those doctors and scientists seeing this fall to where its at, he owes it to them and the product to make this work, not just the shareholders

🤡

🤣🤣

I go on??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Sorry, buy my 10 posts, are yet a flicker to your 1682 at Castle going on and on and on and on and ooooonnnnn

I know it sounds like I'm ramping it, but as once said we are not selling widgets. I know 404x will be here soon to take the mic, run it down, I can't argue with the direction the company has took, the failures in market direction or the unnecessary ramp by burrows prior to sales declaration.

But we are not qualified to judge how these get to markets, not fully, we can talk the talk but reality is we have a great innovative kit, it's expense is factored in and it may take time.

It's not Rodney and delboy here flogging the next best thing, these are doctors and scientists. Peoffesionals, I plan on letting them just get on with it

Yes, just a brief look back on the website shows ours does a great deal more than just initial screening, so the spit test is great news, for men in general we should be happy.

But it's not a competitor beyond detection I'd like to think, having a spit test, leading into our genome mapping test is a viable route as we are not just screening for detection, but identifying bio markers for suitable treatment plans and certain immune indicators for what will work best, patient to patient. Which i doubt a spit test Will do

Like what cancer, what stage and what treatment stage to start with? I'll have to go back and read thoroughly the benefits, but I'm sure ours do more than just a screening to see cancer present.

We will always have competition and many products coming through, who knows, someone could find the cure. But that doesn't render things obsolete

Look I'm not going to lie that looks a great new screening process, but I'm sure OBD test kit us a little more than just screening, I agree the spit test may present a quicker way to detect early, but doesn't the one we offer, give what stage progression, ideal treatment map outs etc?

Red, I'm not saying you are wrong. If people did what they supposed to, then things will improve.

My point is, they don't care, they are stuck at the of society, lazy and care little of their environment. And taxes or punitive measures to those class of people, or small businesses is not the answer.

Better uses of government funded taxes, council allocated funds to improve quality of life will, to make them start caring. That's what I was getting at.

Remember Robin Hood, Prince of thieves? Sherriff "raise taxes, starve them out, make them want to hand him in!! Draconian measures

But I am rambling on a bit haha, I just don't see it being tackled any time soon. Especially how the economy is and the growing disparity of wealth and opportunities.

There has been plenty of social studies that prove you improve people's quality of life, you will improve their surroundings and environments. They simply care more about it.

It's an option problem, councils are not facilitating these things. How many times you go to an airport, a local rural nature area, or places of interest and find 3 grey bins, glass, recycling and waste and think great, and natural causality is people make that good choice.

But how many times you felt frustrated at not locating a bin, and when you do your only option is a sole bin, to where you have to put your plastic bottle on top of a wrap of uneaten chips!