Member Info for dunderhead

What thread was removed? What was in it and what was the personal stuff? Anyone any ideas? Absolutely no new material information will be provided to drewky because if it were, Jay would be up for major criticism and far worse, immediately. I agree with earlier poster that Jay et al should be updating by rns and nothing else, at this sensitive juncture as it is always potentially subjective and the share price could get pretty ropey in the days weeks ahead however, it must be said it seems to be holding pretty well for the moment. All imho of course and best of luck all.

Exactly they are onky making a market for tightly held shares. As we have already seem this morning!! Best of luck all.

BG why they don't need to? Solo funded for first well and if indeed this unlikely suggestion were the case the jv would simply carry on without solo and this certainly would not hold up issuance because zubs could easily guarantee to subsume solo equity? All imho.

Serious question, I don't think I've seen a post from drewkers this am. I hope he's ok? Drewks reply on here if only to tell me to f off!! Got to shoot now so don't take non reply as rudeness.

Lol Monday end equal Monday rns!! Hope that wasn't a prophetic auto correct mistake!

Mate you're missing the point. The first one was an aex related joke and you had already accomplished the request? The second joke totally superfluous?! Right bets on for a Monday end. I'd say thats what everyone is hoping waiting for now and interesting to see how share price will react by cob Monday if nothing official heard by then?

C Perkin do u think it may be better to hear this 'stuff' through official rns issued by bod rather than tweets by TPDC? Just wondering like.... Ps you could have finished that with one of your silly jokes as well mate, what's happening buddy?

Don't you ever ever ever ever criticise the bod on this thread! Didn't you know this is the "la la*" thread where the bod are the greatest and it's ALL the government's and shorters fault? Seriously though any goodwill will start to ebb away quickly, if these Muppets don't update the mkt soon. * only really inane (not funny) wise cracks or bod adulation allowed here. Any dissent will be replied with "la la la la la la la la la la la" etc All imho and dyor.

Peak "they" (the mms) are hardly accumulating at these small volumes?! At the end of the.day if they want to close their book they may drop the price to tempt purchasers or they have dropped based upon upon worked sales going through? I just don't follow this conspiracy stuff. You can buy sod all volume below 28p as I have been 'enquiring' today myself? Anyway the drop in small volumes will be easily replicated as a similar rise on small volumes.if we get good news which us expected (very) soon? All imho of course and dyor!

Yeah but so we have your 'permission' drewky to complain? Is that justified in your (little? (whose being personal now lol?)) minds eye bruv?

Good post anyoldiron and hope you cope well with your hf autism buddy? Don't worry about the aggression on here. There are a load of over emotional people sweating away (but really hapoy with the bod strategy) who unfortunately see conspiracies everywhere. F me why oh why do they think the sp pfmce is anything other than to do with mgt under pfmce??!! Oh sorry, got nothing at all to do with the mgt, it's all the govts fault (now) lol!

I don't follow the mm's games theories. They are there simllyvto make a market and encourage liquidity. This is simply a case of a few more private sellers than buyers. Immaterial but currently illiquid so we see "exagerated" price movements. All imho of course and best of luck all.

Drewky really last time mate because as all of us have differing views of ones own inputs and understandings and I can understand we all have our own egos but maybe to help you with this I have seen u quoted some time ago on another thread being used to describe another (somewhat 'challenged') punter...... "He is the drewky (from lse) of this thread". Take from that what u will. However to be clear, when have I ever not stated that the buck stopped with the govt.??!! FGS man that is so blindingly obvious it doesnt merit saying!!! Everything I have said is not designed at destroying the 'Bod's credibility'. I have made constructive comments and criticisms. If by their actions they have no credibility to speak of, how can that be my fault??!! Try and remember back to when the farm down was presented (when initially you were very critical and angry!) I was the first to congratulate the bod with this deal because although they were the reason we were in such a poor position in the first place it could have been FAR FAR worse!! To be clear though yiu 'agree' I will have a 'right' and be 'justified' to criticise the bod if they don't deliver by 16.30 tonight (I thank you so much for that concession). Even if they do deliver prior to 16.30 surely waiting until the very last minute of last hour merits some criticism? As ever all imho and best of luck to all holders and off now so don't take non reply as rudeness or acceptance of responses.

Wryape honestly buddy I think I have good common sense. R U seriously happy with your aex investment returns to date? Could you explain what common sense concepts I'm having difficulty understanding?

Drewky wtgr you are telling me that I have just realised that the buck stops with the govt.!! This is why there is absolutely no point at all conversing with you. You choose to simply ignore or are unwilling to even consider what people have been saying all along or worse, are simply too stupid and industry inexperienced to comprehend what people have been posting? Then misquote people as if you've been right all along!! I don't know which it is but honestly mate, to have u lecturing me about who understands better the issues facing aex is just so funny buddy!! Hardy I hear what you're saying however these will eventually come good IN SPITE of mgt not because of. This is the gamble money of part of what I think is a reasonably well balanced portfolio however it doesn't stop me from criticising mgt for their respective project delivery and also state respective returns could have been far better had (imho) a better positioned and experienced mgt team been in situ. This will come good probably. It will not give the initial returns I expected however c'est la vie. I will continue holding and criticise where / when I see relevant which imho is far more useful than 'idiot rampers' who only tend to 'turn off' readers of bb boards and receive counter reactionary remarks from other posters. As ever all above imho!!

Ok fjones if that is what you have experienced but my own is certainly different. We worked to stressful challenging deadlines but if we kept on changing them then didn't achieve on a third occasion, for sure, very serious questions would be asked as to perception of under pfmce. Obviously from your experiences you had more understanding mgt teams? Hardy you are correct that 'moaning' on a free bb does nothing however last time I looked, it is 'allowed', as is my response to yours, stating what an obtuse statement to make, regarding selling of shares?

What a ridiculous thing to say regarding selling hardy. Perhaps better to say sack the bod for never achieving anything on their promised time lines or at the very least pay them at the level of their respective (under) pfmces? Of course an rns coukdcappear layer today but equally it simply isn't good enough to be left continually hanging on for last minute updates. Following film themes I'd like to nominate "The Jerk" and of course "The Idiot".

Pressed send too quickly in my excitement! Let's hope we can take them at face value anyway as that's all we've got to rely on at the moment!! Best of luck all.

That's sounds great mat but I don't expect them to say any different to you as this would be an update to previous rns hence market news specific.

Drewky in my experience the development licence is quite technical. It is about ehs/g&g interpretation and the development plan/finance costs of course and whilst legal aspects crop up it is essentially a 'technical submission'. As ever imho.