Member Info for dsaf

LJ, maybe you're little obsession with Tom will now subside somewhat. Now you have factual evidence in a court of law that the deal was valid and the share price did rise on a valid deal as was RNSd at the time.

You should then maybe Direct your anger to successive board members who didn't fulfill the deal on behalf of PPP.

I said to you all just the other day that there was no transparency with this board with shareholders and today just proves it 100%.

"So the deal was real otherwise they wouldn't have put this case forward without evidence."

Correct, all the Tom haters who have been throwing stones at him for a fake deal, all of a sudden wasnt fake.

Lunn said it was a fake deal in a RNS, most believed it.

A good day for transparency if nothing else.

Manipulation by the market makers as usual unfortunately. Plenty of decent buys today.

You might regret that with the next update, if its start of dilling.

Sscss, just banter now from them to try and move the truth and facts off the first page to hide it. Happens every time.

In answer to the documents NU, when your assisting people building a case, it's amazing what evidence people keep. Obviously i'd love to share it with you, but you've already seen it.

Anyway, i'm away for the weekend now so have fun, and give Lunn and Olof my regards.

"what i do know is it was his RNS's that led to many here being defrauded of their well earned cash for almost 2 years "

Clearly you don't actually know. There was a contract in place, as per the RNS with GV, many have seen it with their own eyes. You need to stop your little obsession with Tom and look at Lunn at why it never materialised.

I'm so sorry you have the skin of a goldfish thinking its abuse.

It's not abuse when its truthful and factful. Again, I know its hard for your little peanut to process that.

Yep, knowing you'll be paid to defend the indefensible.

Have a wonderful day!

Not at all NU, when it's truthful and factual... hard for you to understand that I know.

The thing is, Tom didn't have his hands in the till.. hense no legal action by the company as promised, Lunn on the other hand..

Sscss.. don't panic, the bedwetters are out in force about your comment.. but notice, not a single one of them is disputing my posts so they know its true!

So you dont know then.. that solves that one.

You tell me what they are, seems like your just making stuff up now :)

I've told you mine, you don't disagree with it (that report button is now taking a bashing i bet!) so come on..

No lets, because you'll only cry and have it deleted again.. the £38,500 paid to Aventa Capital, aka Michael Carrick as per the FHF Barclays bank statement.. only days after signing Antons will as an independent witness.

The MULTIPLE transactions in the months before antons death that went to Antons personal account, which is now controlled by.......

Drum roll please........

LUNN.

Not at all NU, but as you rightly say this is a discussion board.. until you can accept that god forbid other people have different views to you and you cannot force them to take that view, you'll always look like the prize turnip.

Ofcourse, lets not talk about the wages for doing pushing such a opinion.

"Am I not allowed an opinion then?"

Ha.. incredible. Only if everyone else follows your party line and shares the same opinion.

Sscss, because Lunn has told him that, ofcourse he's going to push it on here..

Peter's case is very strong. Every shred of documented contracts, evidence, bank transfers all saved.. a very smart man.. meanwhile Lunn is still trying to scrape together a defence.

Ofcourse they are Herpes. Ofcourse they are. Amazing how payroll forces a narrative.

Pacman, not at all.. I was this trading as much as anyone else, its beyond a joke now. I want the board to be honest with shareholder, sadly this is a area of which they seem to be inattentive.

Shareholders deserve better.