Member Info for Drewky

Let us get the Violins out! I want my dinner and I want it now or I'll squeam an I'll squeam

No Leafs!!!! Thank you for the article, it is a very good piece of research and analysis.

Just to add for the benefit of another who continually posts WITHOUT FOUNDATION on another BB (ADVFN) that we WILL NOT get a development licence, I suggest he reads this document....

http://www.tpdc-tz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/3-Model-Production-Sharing-Agreement-2013.pdf the full 122 pages might keep him busy for a while

If others actually post in both places please share the following with its members https://aminexunofficial.blogspot.com/2017/07/tpdc-model-production-share-agreement.html where in this extract it shows that the minister has to provide a development licence once the criteria is met!

Please also explain that without such a clause in agreements of this type, it is highly unlikely there would be exploration of any kind ever undertaken in the world.

So, as to the superior knowledge of other PSAs he holds, I suggest he thinks again.

Thanks to leafless for providing a well researched article for the blog

The pressure mounts which should be good news for #AEX #Aminex Tanzania: More #Gas Production or Bust Their Own Plans of Gas to Power by Q1 2019 @AminexPLC @solooilgas https://aminexunofficial.blogspot.com/2018/07/tanzania-more-gas-production-or-bust.html

Tarry the original post was not about that and in any case if anyone is interested in them then they have their own BB, website and RNSs to look at.

As I said, in discussion comparisons are inevitable but imo opinion peeing up the wall contests are not what a bb should be about.

Pete it is no coincidence that the person gloating about the demise of Celtic was the very one Celtic accused of stalking him across other bbs I notice this isn't the only place he has been gloating. As for his childish baiting he will need to read his school report "Must Try Harder" I'm not a fish.

Oz I have no problem with the occasional caparison as being in the same country it is inevitable as what happens to one politically effects us all, but if you and the other kids on your team wish to kick the ball over the fence once in a while I'll play football and kick it back but when you want to start setting up a promotional tent in my garden I'll reach for the matches.

Apache for constant baiting and abusive post last night toward ma Julie and my own mental stability. The post has been removed. Insulting me will be like water off a ducks back but in attacking my woman he has over stepped the mark!

Oz for promoting a competitor company - I have asked for the thread to be removed as any responses are purely highlighting that companies name further.

You may have read all that dodge? Then as it came from the horses mouth why do you wish to present fear of a raise. Perhaps you should try showing a little faith. Every small company at this level run on a tight budget and of course if things go wrong a raise would be required, that's not rocket science. The SP is where it is because people are impatient add that to the greedy and that is the reason it is where it is & news from Romania will show that

Have you not noticed? The sun has been out for a week or two

Great track loved the temptations. I'm doing fine now on cloud nine

Can't get to the man so attack his woman. Says it all really doesn't it.

Mather that is my conspiracy theory that there is a major buyer out there squeezing the price. I may be totally wrong but just look at the amount of attacks coming along. A whiff of a false rumour the other week had someone £1/4million in 2days I think we will see much more big stuff like that in the not to distant future because if this what I think it is they will be ready to go. Much as I dispose them these people know exactly what they are doing The personal stuff is like water of a ducks back to me but they are whipping up peoples insecurites which feeds into their hands

CP I think that big buyer is about get in again. Perhaps the team stimulated a £1/4million premature action a couple of weeks ago and realised he might squeeze it a little more. Won't be long mate and these characters will disappear into the dust and be ramping the hell out of it in totally new guises

What EGM was that then? Can you point us to the notice and minutes? How long are we going to have to put up with this latest deceitful incarnation jeez. This one is on a one man mission to try and wind me up from post one. Oh well cloth ears fitted. Talk to the hand!

Topped up Friday on the low in a faint hope news will be announced in the morning. I don't expect anything until AGM but if good news comes I'll earn a bit more so fingers crossed.

I agree with most you say there manic save that in these low volume times the trolls imo can and do effect the sp. You only have to look how long we have been suffering the low volume and put it next to the share slump. It's no coincidence we have been infested during this time

Manic I understand where you are coming from and perhaps I can come over a little aggressive at times. I am really not that kind of person but I do get angry listening to bull**** from people with vested interests.

You have been here long enough to have seen this constant stream of agitators come and go. They have continually whipped people up into posting negatively and when that happens it affects confidence and people sell and cut losses and of course visitors to the board say not buying in there! That is what it is designed to do, so yes I get angry and maybe some times a little to aggressive but these barstewards are out to take money out of genuine shareholders pockets.

By all means we all have our issues with the way any company is run sometimes but to be literally inferring your CEO is a shyster is out of order unless of course they have factually information to back their claims up?

Those people know who they are and a few of us are wise to them but if you would rather I just let them run riot and not challenge their lies and deceit then I could just let them have a free hand.

If enough of you who I consider genuine, reply with the words "DON'T CHALLENGE THEM" then I will do just that but remember, if you ask the others who challenge to do the same, you will letting the trolls have what I would term free access to your wallets

Your choice

Just following up on that Irish and this should set everybody thinking.

The original 3 part posting of the article containing the fabricated and damaging information is still visible for all the world to see whereas my 3 part response correcting that information has been removed.

Would somebody or some group of somebodies actually like to confess to the reporting of posts containing the facts? In those three posts I gave no personal opinions other than to point out the article contained fabrications! It takes more than one complaint for an item to be removed and this was three!

Just to be clear, I wasn't having a go at Jodo for posting the article either. I was merely defending my position on the conspiracy theory.

So you think it's good to be post that sort of stuff Mather? Stuff that contained fabrications that could damage the sp if the share we are all invested in. Any of the facts that they did put in the article we all know anyway. It's in the public domain from the communications we have had. Too few I grant you but the rest was utter rubbish written to an agenda and for you and those that support this sort of rubbish I suggest you remember it is your share it is talking down. Another .05 on the morning of publication I believe. If you have one million shares that's another £500 wiped out. In times of low volume this crap can be particularly harmful.

Well Jodo if you are trying to refer to CP, or myself perhaps you may as well say so. What is between you two is your business but I for one do subscribe to the conspiracy theory and that article in my view is a culmination of the last year's events and is well timed for a final squeeze before the AGM. Of course others disagree as is there right but if I see a wisp of smoke I think let's beware but when I see plumes of smoke I think fire and especially when that article was based so a lot of libelous material that has been posted on here of late. All I did in response to your republishing of the article was to point out the fabrication and inaccuracies within it. Cameron and the company have informed me they are to take matters further with the publisher so it's entirely possible that the source of the libelous comment could well be thrown to the legal shark's and I hope that is the case. I have no wish to get involved in a dispute with you but I will ask in publishing why you yourself did not pick up on the issues I pointed out in order to provide a balanced view?