Member Info for Dip666

I've completed some prior research into valuing mining projects and assets when GGP was in an Option Exercise for Newcrest to potentially pick up 5% more of their Havieron project.

Below are links to assist those wishing to learn more about the Valmin Code which is more a guiding set of principles akin to the JORC Code rather than a strict format for valuations but a good way of understanding the semantics and factors in assiging a commercial value to an asset.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odc0Y0ppI1E

- A YouTube presentation with great information on both the Code and application of it, worth watching the full hour.

https://www.csaglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/MGEI-2016_The-VALMIN-Code_Ivy-Chen_October_2016.pdf

- Link to download some presentation slides that are a good reference to get an overview of the Valmin Code and a bit on the 'Reasonable Test' towards the end, those particular slides are weighted towards one, not all three of the valuation approaches contained within the Valmin Code.

https://www.mediafire.com/folder/uv8jaum5kycrr/-+FMV+Valuation

- Here are some files I have collated, you can download the Valmin Code and related docs referred to in the guidance material plus a Valuation example conducted by SRK taht I used as a 'test case' of sorts to see how the code was applied. The Kharmagtai valuation was commissioned and completed within two months.

- The folder also contains both a summary and a synopsis I have pulled together from the SRK document to help summarise and pick out key learning points on how the code was applied in this instance by SRK.

- The overall valuation is well over 100 pages long, so quite a lengthy read and the Summary and Synopsis can be used to understand the key information and methodology used as oppose to reading the entire valuation.

Could be Rotherby :-)

So much well never know in detail perhaps and as a curious soul, it is irritating at times but something I'm used to by now with this game :-)

Helx2 - easily pasted from slides.

Now let's try building on this with details on:

- substantiated list of achievements to date

- how the potential will be delivered using examples of past success evidenced by the team

As for interviews, in the past I've created both transcripts and highlights of previous interviews than just direct folk to listen to them - both here and TG.

i've also contacted the BOD to clarify and confirm various things and shared the correspondence.

All you seem to do is be insulting and copy/paste or use AI to generate stuff - with little analytical work or anything actually comprising utilising a few brain cells, you have to be pretty thick to not understand how to use ChatGPT properly by now...

Anyway - come on- make a real effort numpty.

I know how I combat FUDsters on any board I'm positive that the BOD have the best interests of the shareholders and are competent... I hammer them with facts about the fundamentals and achievements to date and how the potential will be delivered using examples of past success evidenced by the team.

Now over to Max and Helx2 who will share these with everyoneI am sure :-)

I think a deal will be struck so still holding as advantage of a low average - so I see a fair chance of recovering and making money from my perspective as the assets are unquestionable. As a long term play my opinion is - not with this team in place despite the quality of assets.

Further, is this a project that might have been funded as was originally planned with a deal being a secondary avenue only if very appealing - as we were lead to believe the AA negotiation was going to be?

I think it was in theory with the economics perhaps albeit I'd like to see an up to date DFS - but suspect Due Diligence is an issue for potential lenders when considering this as a solo venture by Alien, but what aspect? My opinion is the personnel involved in the company and/or the corporate set-up don't pass muster for various reasons so a deal is the best way forward.

So fingers crossed this lot can close something now and as for webinars - a well run company has nothing to fear and everything to gain by investing in comms with potential and existing investors.

I work on the premise that the market is 'crooked' in the sense that the mechanisms favour the big boys and you've just got to navigate around it. You always have more potential for insane gains in this type of environment to go with the risk and volatility after all - you have to brave the risks to make the potential gains and can't have it both ways sadly.

As no newbie to investing/trading, at times I've really focused on the daily games for months at a time (aided by many excellent co investors) and there has been more what some might term 'manipulation' but I'd term 'taking advantage of the opportunities' here by the big boys than any other stock I've ever invested in - but I've never just held a stock as long as this one too.

Stocks that have had the insane amount of attention this has at times are the perfect targets for those players, not convinced that there has ever been a targeted attack by a party looking to take us over etc. - just that there was the opportunity to short the stock or make money from the trading volumes and patterns perhaps. Seems like the way the deal was structured has given many a nice entry into GGP now - not much we can do but get into 2025 and see if the team can now execute the strategy and deliver the growth in mCap to reward all shareholders - new and existing.

I think these types of conditions are very much the norm in most JV's @Nomlas - but glad we had it in there as the damn Option Exercise certainly wasn't 'genius' so at least the old management got this bit right :-)

GGP's LROR with Havieron which is integral to the business case for a purchase of both assets complicated things for any potential buyer.

They found a another way to add to their portfolio and future production.

He's got a valid point this time, you wouldn't use ChatGPT to analyse UFO and as it just told Helx2 it isn't able to accurately answer this type of query to give any actionable and validated insights.

Too unresearched to be able to discuss the company and too stupid to utilise AI properly and too lazy to debate something by putting posts together and being civil, just a rude brainless numpty who posts nonsense :-)

I then asked:

So would you say your analysis is limited or effective without the factors discussed above being provided?

Without the specific factors discussed—like real-time data, sentiment scores, or historical datasets—my analysis of human sentiment impacting stock market prices is limited. Here's why:

Why It's Limited

Lack of Real-Time Context: Without current sentiment data or trends, I can only draw on historical principles and generalizations, which may not apply to specific scenarios.

Inability to Quantify Sentiment: Sentiment impact is often measurable using tools like natural language processing (NLP) or market-specific indices. Without these, my analysis lacks numerical grounding.

Complex Interactions: Stock market movements result from numerous variables—macroeconomic factors, corporate performance, and sentiment. If these are not quantified or provided, my insights are primarily theoretical.

Where It Can Still Be Effective

Conceptual Understanding: I can explain the mechanisms by which sentiment influences markets, such as herd behavior, fear and greed cycles, and overreaction to news.

Hypothetical Scenarios: Based on hypothetical sentiment trends, I can suggest plausible outcomes grounded in economic and financial theory.

Guidance on Analytical Methods: I can recommend tools, metrics, or strategies to evaluate sentiment's impact more rigorously, even if I can’t execute these analyses without data.

Conclusion

While I can provide a foundational understanding and theoretical insights, a lack of specific data severely limits my ability to deliver nuanced or actionable analysis. To unlock the full potential of my analysis, supplying the right datasets or enabling me to access real-time information is crucial.

I asked ChatGPT:

How accurate is your analysis in areas such as human sentiment impacting stock market prices.

Analyzing how human sentiment impacts stock market prices is a complex task that relies on various factors, including market data, sentiment analysis techniques, and the quality of the inputs. My ability to provide accurate insights depends on the following factors:

Quality of Sentiment Data: If provided with robust and recent data—like social media sentiment, news sentiment scores, or survey results—I can analyze trends and correlations effectively. Without access to this real-world data, the analysis is more theoretical.

Historical Context: I use patterns derived from historical data to suggest possible outcomes. While these are grounded in economic and psychological principles, they may not perfectly predict future market movements because of unique, unforeseen events.

Statistical Analysis: If given datasets, I can perform statistical or machine-learning analyses to quantify correlations between sentiment and price movements. These analyses would be evidence-based but subject to the limitations of the available data.

Dynamic Market Influences: Market movements are influenced by a mix of quantitative factors (earnings reports, interest rates, etc.) and qualitative ones (trends in sentiment). Sentiment alone rarely drives markets—it interacts with broader financial and macroeconomic trends.

Model Limitations: While I’m trained on a wide array of financial concepts and analysis techniques, my predictions or analyses aren’t infallible. Financial markets are inherently uncertain, and no model, including mine, can guarantee accuracy.

Real-Time Updates: If I can browse or am provided up-to-date data (news, sentiment indices, etc.), my insights improve. Otherwise, my analysis may lack real-time relevance.

For a robust analysis of sentiment's impact on markets, combining my insights with domain-specific tools, real-time data, and professional judgment is advisable.

Wolfy - if he was a paid ramper - he is ineffective - he hardly gets any tick ups here or X.

I've changed my opinion of UFO over time and if they start making progress - I'll change it again. I don't haev to be at the same point of happy or angry as you in total sync, we all have our own opinions at each significant forward or backward step.

I've said in past that from time to time he posts useful links but best to analyse yourself as he is too biased by far - albeit more politely usually but as his own behaviour has grown more aggressive, i have not supported it and called him out on it.

Whether I am positive or negative - I articulate my opinions clearly and detail why and what I feel could have been done better or why I think progress is good/bad when posting seriously as sure, i like to post some nonsense from time to time like many on here for a laugh - talking generally about the site.

How is max affecting anything?

He isn't technical in his posts, he doesn't really discuss strategy in any meaningful way - he's just a VERY optimistic poster who copy/pastes a few press articles or iron ore forecasts (only the good ones of course lol) vs trying to shape anyone's thinking by sharing analysis vs just blindly optimistic opinion.

No one would pay for that - waste of money. His X posts are the same - not really capturing any attention. LSE would have fired him if he was here to help engagement as this board is usually dead... no such thing as LSE paid posters or companies paying for them IMO.

I've been the most recommended poster on this site before through posting a lot on GGP - folk tick you up if they feel your input is useful or they agree with it. Max barely has any presence on LSE - so what is he influencing in reality... nothing - so no point in arguing with him. He has a right to post here as annoying as some find him, same as likes of Chris2 did - as long as they stay within the rules, or they should get banned.

@Helx2 - not happy with the board sentiment - then create some detailed posts breaking down what amazing things have been achieved, convince those who disagree rather than moaning about people moaning, list the achievements to date, convince everyone through explaining why you are so content etc.

Freddo 'RayGun' back spinning and windmilling at a Town Hall near you in 2028 - can't wait :-)

Some useful links below Z :-)

https://www.ggpchat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=969

And this is link to latest corp prez:

https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Greatland-Corporate-Presentation-Dec-24.pdf

@TAD - you forgot someone for Investor Relations in your list mate - irony or what ;-))

And no, I'm not free for the role lol

Come on guys - stop being silly and blaming SMiller or 'da consortium'.

Any deal is better negotiated from a higher mCap so while I expect a deal to be signed and am confident (fairly!) I'll be ok with a lower average I hope some of you expressing confidence have a lower average to ensure ROI is coming in a timeframe you will be able to stay invested in.

We might well need funding soon and a higher SP would be better there too, a good update didn't mean that they mentioned a deal was coming next week... just a clear update on what was accomplished last year to beat the general market perception that little was (check the SP to assess current sentiment) and what they could share about progress, clarifying reasons for new talks and freezing old deal, try and win over the increasingly frustrated retail shareholder base.

Some of you don't seem to understand the benefits of good PR and comms in relation to both shareholder confidence and investing attractiveness with some of the commentary of late - much like the BOD apparently :-))

I meant rescheduled not restarted, auto correct

Not sure I'd put them in for a dancing competition, we would be looking at Raygun all over again ;-))

I'm pretty sure you were one of those some of us had to remind to be less excited about the schedule a few years back moon in trying to explain about permitting etc.

I'm glad you now realise this my friend but the anger being expressed by some is around a commitment made to address some concerns from a large contingent of the retail base that has now been restarted with a less than comprehensive reason...

LOL @DH and @Jiffy :-)

I was going to go with Frank Gallagher from Shameless for CP but wasn't sure everyone would have got that lol