Member Info for Dip666

GGP Mk2 is a new company with a new strategic vision and plan than what we had in 2020.

We have 2 key assets and an enlarged portfolio and interests, more opportunities, more risks, more potential and plenty of hard work required to get where we need to get to.

Contained below in the prez is the Go Forward plan and roadmap ahead.

https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Transformational-Acquisition-of-Havieron-Telfer-Investor-Presentation.pdf

The majority of what most of us whether as supporters or detractors have said in the past is meaningless now - it belongs in the past with the old GGP - time to forget it and move on.

If the GGP team can execute the above strategy in the next 12 to 18 months - then they'll have built the foundation of a top Oz mining company that will be around for a long time in one form or another IMO.

The other critical area for us as shareholders is that the success from delivering the above brings a demand for shares that provides us with shareholder value.

Like any other publicly listed company the onus will be on those employed in various roles in the company to help create that demand and entice investment. As a shareholder I want to see the value of my shares grow and in time see dividends if in for the long haul.

No point looking back - we need to look forward and analyse and judge the company from this point forward and there will be PLENTY of new data and reports to chew over soon.

We have the people, we have the skills, we have the funding capability and hopefully as shareholders we will all have the time to wait for shareholder value to be generated.

Par for the course on these boards mate :-))

Personally when I said 'kiss the ATH high away' I was referring to the fact that it's a new company as of yesterday.

To clarify - GGP Mark 2 is a new company - more shares issued but much more in assets and the portfolio :-)

Better to think about potential mCap growth based on new shares in issue was my intended message, especially with consolidation in pipeline too we'll be at Tymers 88p soon enough lol

As for GGP hitting the mCap it needs for 38p based on shares in issue right now... IMO it's a 3-5 years target as best as anyone can try and forecast that far out... based on what I know today - as new information and events coem to eth fore - so will my opinion.

The Lassonde Curve for Havieron has been altered, the Pre Production rise will begin from DFS/DTM whenever that happens in the next 12 months. The Lassonde Curve is per project not the company overall and TBF to Starbright who can often be a pain in butt - folk often confuse mCap with SP on the chart and the resultant effect to ROI. In our case it was accretive but going to take time for it to be factored in it seems.

It seems the market is going to need Q1 revenue and Telfer R&R updates to get excited about us being a producer and Bamps work on that front makes for interesting reading giving me confidence personally that eventually we'll have the proof needed to convince investors.

For sure guys and if the landscape changes then we get to set new targets and plans :-))

I definitely think GGP will continue to grow and grow - in 10 years time the current BOD and Shaun may not even be around but the foundation will have been set. If they deliver outstanding growth year after year I will stlll be here too probably.

But I assess things form quarter to quarter moving forward now we're a 'proper' company - just the way I invest... Ace is rolling his eyes right now thinking ya boring git lol

I agree with MH01, firstly I think a SP target based on existing SP of 20p by end of 2025 is a fair upper-range to set for GGP, my range of growth I expect is somewhere in 200-300% if the market favours our Telfer updates and Havieron DFS plus macro not turning against us by end of 2025.

2-3 bagger doesn't sound as sexy as 2020 does it... but that was a different time and a different company - kiss that 38p ATH away, it's not relevant any more IMO. We just bought Telfer and Havieron outright and issued a lot of shares to get there. How accretive value is translated over time into SP growth is hard to predict so early into our journey.

Secondly - we know we're consolidating around ASX so we should focus on MCap moving forward, make a note of todays and base your target ranges off multiples off that vs the SP - as we'll probably consolidate by mid 2025 for ASX. The SP consolidation is more about optics as I think Antigua mentioned - to help attract more insto type suitors I would think.

2020 Discovery hype, 12 rigs, money printers in overdrive was just a different time. The growth will be less explosive and extended now IMO as the 2nd wave usually is of LC. Personally, I'll be unhappy and adapt or exit my holding if we're not at least 200% increased by end of 2025, but this allows GGP team time to execute their initial stages in Go Forward plan beyond Hav DFS/DTM to give me an accurate gauge of what this team can do in terms of shareholder value.

I again would suggest, set yourself a clear target about a year ahead and stop worrying too much about daily SP fluctuations for now. I'd also add I am really dissapointed for those holding high averages and kind of locked in now if timeframes allow them to wait. Who could have predicted the crazy events that would unfold - we do own both assets but a price has been paid at the very least in terms of time.

Hopefully the fact that GGP controls it's own destiny and owns these two assets outright without onerous debt burden and a potentially non-dilutive pathway to Hav production will counterbalance the way the deal was structured :-)

LOL mate, original draft was done 18 months ago if not longer with Sandeep driving the taxi!

Just remembered I had it when someone said something about shorters to me and hastily updated and posted :-)

I've had fun at least with writing silly stories and daft posters if nothing else the last few years amongst the angst and drama here :-))

***A New Era!***

Shaun Bond the man of action or Shaun Sun Tzu the strategist?

Leading a talented and fearless #GGP team against the odds...

They conquered the Option exercise...

They decimated the Acquisition challenge...

Onwards to the future!!!

#unstoppablemomentum

#onlythebeginning

And here’s a commemorative poster for today!

https://www.mediafire.com/view/yrfswljwd90vsez/ALL_ROADS_LEAD_TO_HAVIERON.jpg/file

The world is full of lazy incompetents Freddo lol

Jokes aside...

Why would anyone pay for this low level of AI generated content - they may as well just go to an AI engine and type in a quick question. Is anyone going to pay for the convenience of poorly generated content that hasn't been verified for technical or financial accuracy etc. or even been spell checked... no.

You need to offer the above and perhaps some insights or recommendations to stand out, too many of guys trying to commercialise AI without deep commercial backgrounds who fail to understand the semantics of product development and even basic marketing practice. Everyone's offering half baked AI generated content but few are getting it right.

Do you realise how damaging it is to a 'brand' to be bring a half baked product to the public eye, improve the quality and output to a point it's worth reading and then you'll find some of us will be happy to engage and give feedback rather than mock - which is also partly due to your own attitude in how you post here and talk to valued members of the community.

No offence meant from me, I couldn't care less but for the fact you've insulted some I respect here, adjust your own attitude and you might find both your time and others in here more productive.

I dropped a typo in there to make you feel better mate lol

Sub standard work is seb standard work, all there is to it

Telfer not Telfar...

The last attempt was massively out of sync with what was actually happening and factual inconsistencies.

Makes me wonder if worth wasting the time reading the rest?

I hope your paid services are of a far better standard, this kind of amateur hour rubbish would get you fired in a true commercial setting.

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5no2NFMGzeQ

@Ace - just read his last 2000 posts - they're essentially repeating the same meaningless waffle!

He's probs out to the shops getting tonights alcohol to drunk post again and bore everyone lol

@chuffchuff, I warned them to wait for scally results tbh as I felt odds of a big hit on initial programs was low but they wanted some action seeing how the share had done :-)

Managed to get their averages down by having warned them to keep at least 50 percent of their stake back at least but never thought they'd have such a long wait to get to even back then. Just glad their money is safe now and will get back into profit.

I won't mince words though, the deal structure was in the main most beneficial for major stakeholders and new entrants than many LTH with higher averages and entries from late 2020 onwards... I see the benefits from perspective of the business but sadly means a mid to long term outlook for many LTH with higher averages probably.

It is a good reminder that all shareholders can never be fully aligned with our different averages and timeframes and sometimes what is best for the company may not suit all shareholders. Perhaps reducing debt burden and a non dilutive path to production at Havieron brings interest to propel SP faster... hence I am giving 12 months to see what the team can do before deciding what future strategy is best.

Time is the most precious commodity in some ways so the last few years feels a bit wasted in some ways, but the knowledge gained will ensure better investment decisions in this crazy sector moving forward of nothing else :-)

@Chuffchuff - absolutely mate - inflation has ot be factored into everything.

the old ATH means nothing now as the company has changed with new assets and opportunities and challeneges, shares issued have also changed so new targets have to be set on the basis of day 1 tomorrow and how we might see growth from that point.

I really feel for those with higher averages as a biter pill to swallow that new entrants will see instant gratification vs having to wait. And for those like yourself with more limited timeframes mate, hopefully we'll see a sharp rerate before you need to sell any mate :-))

@ace - yep I know- boring as heck lol

@Freddo - yep course it is mate, I'm talking more about assessing SP growth a few months after the DTM published to see how much interest it generates in eth market -in theory we shoudl see plenty I hope, especially with ASX where they understand mining better...

As always - time will tell :-))

Some anger being expressed at the SP not really reacting to the news the deal will be closed tomorrow now here and on TG - which is to me very understandable as been a torrid journey to get here. I've thought about things myself and come to the conclusion that we probably need about 12 months to fairly assess the team and perhaps see a decent rerate formed - given where we are now and how things are mapped out for the next year. Thought I'd share my thoughts on how I'll be assessing the performance as below as working out a plan helps destress and focus you I always feel :-)

I think you do need to give it 12 months minimum from keys in hand to really judge their capability fairly and build a decent picture of what they might achieve from 2026 onwards.

It’s 2 stages for assessing GGP team for me - based on the current roadmap and predicted catalysts - which of course might change in future but I think unlikely TBH.

*Stage 1 for me is a few months after ASX listing, GDX inclusion, Q1 Revenue and Telfer resource updates.

This should have seen a decent rerate forming into the 2nd half of 2025 when we’d also expect what I term stage 2 to be driving new interest.

*Stage 2 - Hav DFS/DTM - surely a well received DFS and DTM should now initiate the pre production rerate for our crown jewel moving forward.

While the last third or quarter of a development phase into production is usually the steepest climb, the initial phase also usually delivers based on Lobo Tigre’s PPSS study - it’s the middle phase that can be slow with technical and financial hurdles that can present themselves.

However, in GGP’s case if Shaun can deliver on a non-dilutive path to development then this will also not be an issue. Issues during development could rear their ugly head but that is true for any mining development and some should be factored into our expectations as with any project schedule and budget.

The above should in theory take us into 2026 with a very decent rerate and plenty of momentum being shown for further growth. If not, then questions should probably be asked, but for me, I'll give them 12 months to show they can deliver shareholder value.

Hope you're well Z and thanks for keeping the Roadmap updated all these years :-)

Well - from Wednesday it's over to Shaun and team to DELIVER over the next few years on that Platform For Growth.

TBH I'm not interested in slow growth to keep my money invested here as this is a growth based investment not dividend payments, I'd hope for a return to shareholder value by the time we have a Hav DFS/DTM if this team proves to be as capable as they have been elsewhere in their careers.

Exceptional teams and assets should deliver exceptional results - the time to start judging on performance is now close but I do think they'll need a good 12 months minimum to give opportunity for fair appraisal of how they are returning shareholder value to account for ASX, GDX, Telfer resource and reserves and Hav DFS/DTM - then you can really gauge the future potential fairly IMO.

Https://youtu.be/FfVoFacUUsY?si=-iMgqo1gbhD2aU-f