RE: Proteus in Alaska10 Oct 2024 11:49
Furthermore: Splitting companies, or disaffliliating parts of it (SAE to Proteus) is like smoke and mirrors. I'm rather confused what I'm invested in now. SAE used to plan, develop, build, install, run, maintain everything concerning tidal energy. So far, so good. Then proteus split off, because of ... "reasons", and SAE remained as a hull, or something like Oersted waiting for here and then turbines from Andritz (who actually dont just talk but put out turbines). So SAE, where I came investing for turbines and "all the tidal stuff" seems now ... somehow impalpable. Oh okay they put plastics into pellets to burn in an old coal plant and they do negociate and reel in new, potential capacities for Meygen, and build an energy storage site. So I'm SAE - wise invested in a huge area (lets call it theme park) with only three attractions and a potential fourth which is maintenanced atm. Proteus... all the (more thrilling) engeneering part about the watermills aso, now "plans" too. Which leaves me puzzled, because I thought proteus was all about hardware and SAE (still a brother, oder father / family) was about planing and stuff. I'm not too deep into this as some of you, and I know some of you will attack me because of my overdone "way of expressing myself and my thoughts dilemma", but it's really confusing me. Whats the role of proteus and who are SAE? Are there any overlaps or are we opponents now? Do we work together? Has SAE orderd any turbines and are they currently being built by Andritz or Proteus?