The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
10.22 - I agree..the company has plenty of catalysts currently all shares are being pushed around by the wider market environment and concerns about economic pathway in the short/medium term.
10.07- it’s a bit like being in a boat, bobbing about on the tide….when a hurricane comes through you’ll end up moving far further.
19.02 - potential economic down turn / recessions regardless of driver is never good.
On the plus side we get a bit of a break from certain posters with their general "mine's bigger than yours" attitude across companies.
Sat 14.19
I can only go on my experience but accept that may not be the same as others.
I’m not too sure there will be any other sort of investor meeting. Might be wrong and hope I am but that seemed to be a stylistic thing and doesn’t immediately strike me as being his. I’m not really that bothered, can read RNSs, presentations and can do research…I just care that they focus on existing assets, find something material in the most efficient way possible…in a nutshell that what’s missing from this story. Even the good old, fail fast, is
Looking shakey at not far off 10 years in
MCX
“and now near down to its bottom, wow this aged well. Mgc, it's jubilee week, for queen and country... LFG!!!!”
guess the author?…
Dull AND lazy…a lot to be proud of…keep it up :-)
09.01 - Don't need to tell the board that good performance and results means everyone wins.
And on a cynical front, why should previous board members gain returns from that periods sub optimal performance if the current board do perform. If the current board get the results they should get paid, not legacy people
https://alaska.conocophillips.com/newsroom/news-releases/story/conocophillips-alaska-s-fiord-west-kuparuk-produces-first-oil-from-record-setting-horizontal-well/
We have a bit of that down there too
14.16 - Yeah, couldn't remember the base %'age...anyway, I think most will agree, 15% is enough to work on existing prospects which they should have and to try to get a definitive result, rather than looking for greener grass over the fence. easy to say in hindsight but could have done with the 7.1 motion refusal a couple of years back tbh
09.00 - I saw that. Could be a message that not comfortable with the extra 105 share dilution discretion on top of the standard (12.5%) I think. In recent year in retrospect its been used to purchase other companies that have failed to deliver and put on ice our original plays which showed promise. Comes across as marry the girl you have rather than running round lifting the skirts of others...DWs skirt lifting analogy, not mine
17.37…yeah great bear did it properly with a fire sell when it over extended reliance on the government credits.. and didn’t pantheon **** up Texas properly? Everyone in the oil industry has skeletons in the cupboard…people in glasshouses Darth dear boy
14.20 - Appreciate the positivity. In reality given history there needs to be a positive assessment of a new (revisited) target, funding/partner in place and a successful drill to re introduce value here. Speaking to the last bit, only a successful drill will make a material difference...it'll bobble along till feb/mar next year