Member Info for Ddraig

Don’t care when it comes as long as the result is right. Everyone been here before hoping for an RNS and there have been occasions it wasn’t good. Let’s pray this one is a leap forward, not a step back

22.41

None of us have anymore idea than the next.

Last RNS will give you the best idea of timing anyone has

My 2 cents…share price movement until result is just noise. Outcome good or bad will set the share price scene materially. Personal front I don’t really care too much who’s doing what until that RNS is issued

I wouldn’t imagine the eagle eyes of this board missed it but I did miss the posts.

Looks like mangroves are below the 0.5%

My strategy is to sit back and let this wash out.

Regardless if that’s done before results, the result will trump any funding overhang, one way or the other.

This isn’t the first time they have followed this pattern.

Whether you support it or not, it’s not an unknown

09.39 - maybe that was the plan…show a marginal (to limit exposure) public short to unnerve investors . Or just following the pattern that aligns to funding strategy to raise in advance not to raise at the point they need it.

Doubt very much they ‘knew’

Whatever, I would imagine this will disappear very quickly…big risk for them to run into flow results.

I doubt less the geology and opportunity given other wells but there is still operational risk to make sure we get the best/representative result.

Personally this is the most impactful operation I’ve been invested in….fingers crossed as ever

Think the board were clear about US listing and expectations.

It’s capital that drives it. It’s cheaper and more readily available in the US.

20.50

Late 2025 / early 2026….no coincidence that’ll coincide with having production flow test data

Volume so far is very very low.

Nowhere to hide for order gaming

12.09

Certainly. Some used to work for me

08.48. Presumably as you’re Yoda of the order book then you must be able to make money out of this?…otherwise your conjecture's pointless also

09.11 each to their own

08.48

Not sure I share this. Agree it’s a blurred line but there are many buckets that exchange traded instruments are governed for manipulative behaviours. Sadly very few instances are seen and investigated

Phishing

Washing

Various forms of insider dealing

Front running

Smoking

Advancing the bid

Cross product manipulation

Quote stuffing

Pinging

Ramping/hampering

Layering

Trash and cash

Placing orders with no intention

Pump and dump

Momentum ignition

Customer crossing transacting (crossing)

Pre-arranged trades

Painting the tape

Spoofing

Excessive bid/offer spreads

Creation of floor/ceiling pattern

Trading ahead of trade ideas

Flipping an order

Large order execution

I could go on….

07.41

Like most things in this country, they are only interested if they make money (through fines) or enforce quantitative easing through large scale remediation and compensation programs

12.16 - congrats for wasting your own time

09.44

Thanks and you got it :-)

09.38

Ha ha and your response had vast amounts of value contained…well done you

07.56

Anyone invested would like that.

But sometimes there isn’t that enthusiasm after a previous foot fault.

Dubhe and megrez are completely different animals but many don’t know the difference.

Either way, if the results are as expect or better this has to rerate as this opens up production viability and significant development savings with the gas available and a secure long term buyer.

Those that sit on the sidelines or are reducing their risk before initial results will have lost an opportunity.

Obviously if the opposite occurs they’ll rightly have chosen the right strategy.

14.52

It’s interesting and unsure if that’s what’s going on but …spoofing is market manipulation therefore a financial crime.

Maybe AIM isn’t in as much spotlight but once in the US main listing next year anyone engaging in these activities may end up with “a knock on the door”