Member Info for Ddraig

Seedless 08.15 - 5 drills? can you name all 5 for me? oh and you can't include ice wine1 or Charlie 1 as both encountered hydrocarbons of which the later has an independent resource estimate for recoverable oil.

Not at all, but didn’t see the point of someone setting up a multiple account and then telling me tom DYOR cheeky B...lol. Anyway, admin have fixed that...

11.34 - Ha ha...you went to the trouble to set up a new account to do that. You really have a pointless existence lol.
Gives you something to do on your 5% down for the day.
Hopefully results will be soon...maybe... C U next Tuesday.

Has the company issued any statements as to how they’re planning to announce news? By that I mean if they are planning to announce any information on initial findings as they go through the targets or withhold until they reach TD? Appreciate the 3 brookian targets are less discreet than the kaparuk

12.37 - totally agree. I just filter trolls, they don’t bother me as that type of character will never amount to much, will expire, be buried and forgotten ...as I’ve said before I have no interest in helping people if they are stuck in ignorance or are manipulators.

12.24...the correction was for fat fingers in the text where I put greenie45 not 64....should have just said moron...then there would be no confusion...

I can see that, I was responding to brom not waste his time with this muppet..the point is discussing the matter with greenie64 is futile. He wants to stick to an opinion which has more holes than Swiss cheese and despite solid evidence to the contrary.
I’ve reported them as misleading so we’ll see if they remain published....i suspect they won’t and he/she will be gone.

* Greenie64

11.51 - brom, l’d give up with Greenie45 as I have. He’s either trying to play an angle, in a pretty rudimentary and unsophisticated way....or he’s just plain stupid. Either way he’s not worth the time given he’s been a member since the day of the ANN and RNS on 22 Jan ‘21...just another DH, isn’t the first, won’t be the last but at least there are plenty of switched on people that can easily pick while in their misleading comments.

11.04 & 11.08. I’m not mistaken, you are intellectually challenged, reported and now filtered. If you respond I won’t even see it.
Good luck in life not being able to understand basic information.

02.37 - so what you’re saying is ASX halted trading then 88e issued and ANN and completely lied and said they initiated the halt? ....lol

The company will have communicate to ASX to halt trading, whilst the company drafts and publishs the ANN.

02.37 - anything to back up your comments?

00.36 - good luck with your very primitive agenda...
ASX notice says “....the securities of 88 Energy Limited (“88e”) will be placed in a trading halt at the request of 88e”

00.36 - that’s none sense...but happy to report the post as misleading.

21.15 - J.C. ...between what I and Brom have said it should be clear, the information is there and it’s pretty easy to understand (generally companies like to make sure that’s the case and indeed exchanges demand it).
You clearly don’t understand it and I’m not a teacher so you’ll just have to live in confusion.
....and filtered

The immovable object and unstoppable force lol. Some time in March, maybe April we’ll know.

So to summarise. There’s a risk that the drill permit won’t be signed therefore no drill which would affect share price... that do.

20.08 - 88 Energy is currently seeking clarification on a recently announced 60 day suspension of authority for Department Bureaus and Offices in relation to the issuance of new drilling permits on Federal land, amongst other things, by the US Department of the Interior. Of note, the authority for approvals has not been completely withdrawn but has been delegated to various higher positions within the government. The signed order can be found here:

https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/elips/documents/so-3395-signed.pdf

From me memory BEX had the original play and we’re looking for partners, this was 88e and another funder. The other funder walked away and 88e stepped up and took a majority of the interest as a reinvention, post Tangiers.
This is why on a number of communications you’ll see a gross WI and a ‘net to 88e’ which strips out BEX’s WI. That was project Icewine. Since then some of the additions such as peregrine and Umiat, I believe, are 88e ventures and have been funded solely by and sole WI for 88e (pre any farmout) which is probably why they use different subsidiaries.
Your turn, care to elaborate in the material headline differences of private companies, public companies, charities, trusts, government bodies and quasi government bodies in your vast experience?

19.44 - can do. Would you like to tell us the difference between a private and public company?
Or why you’re constantly trying to raise uncertainty because a company has a parent subsidiary relationship?
D