Member Info for davidpqz

I think point 3 is especially encouraging. They are of course, harvesting CTC's from all secondary sites not just one as in a biopsy.

Sorry to be picky but according to Wikipedia IBS 'has no known organic cause'. In other words it just presents as a bunch of symptoms. I must be missing the point - I don't understand how 4D can have an answer to a disease with no know cause.

I'm new to this share, so bear with me. As I see it this company has about £75m in cash yet has a market cap of £560m while just entering phase 1 trials. How is this valuation justified?

Genghis, Perfect. Thanks very much.

I haven't been following Angle for a while so maybe someone can help me here. I see from the website that parsortix has gained the CE kitemark for clinical use in the EU. Why isn't Angle pursuing commercialisation of the Parsortix system in Europe as this market is many times larger than the research market?

“e-invoicing was only used by a quarter of the small businesses we spoke to”. out of a statistically significant 1000 sample of SME's (small & medium sized businesses) . A large proportion of Tungsten's suppliers are in fact, SMEs and yet based on this survey most of them don't use e-invoicing. How do you square that with 93% of Tungstens invoices being e-invoices. Is Tungsten cherry picking the large enterprises? Go back to the library and take down the book on simple arithmetic. By the way how much they are owed is irrelevant to this argument. K3VMC, I see congratulations are due - you got an honorary mention in Winnifrith's "Bulletin Board Morons of the Week" . Burn? What burn?

93% by volume of the invoices processed by Tungsten are e-invoices as stated in the 2015 annual report. Does this indicate that Tungsten is unable to process invoices for the nearly 75% of small suppliers which is what Hurwitz's statement could be taken to imply. I've always suspected that there are major problems in this area, that is that a system which is applicable to only a fraction of a supplier's invoices is really more of a hinderance than an aid.

PAULWI This company is really opaque. The original idea of buying a bank was sold as the brilliant game changing idea but now they are trying to sell the bank - no clear explanation given apart from some vague joint venture. On this BB you will find only half a dozen people who form a clique and are here for self promotion and not serious analysis. TUNG may come true but right now there are far too many unanswered questions.

In my experience no news is bad news. At the time of the AGM they were also saying that approval for the new quarry was due 'any day' and that was about six weeks ago. I was very hopeful for this share until mid June. Now I'm out but will be back in on real news. By the way, in answer to a question I saw on here recently, the company has said that they expect the factory to be operational by 'late July'.

It's in an RNS dated the 10th June. On here it's http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=BOO&ArticleCode=tb7ta3r1&ArticleHeadline=Trading_Update However if you don't subscribe to lse you might have to go to the other LSE to find it.

BOO has produced a fine trading update this morning.

Has anyone checked the accuracy of Zak Mir's predictions? Personally I put more faith in my horoscope.

Authorisation for new quarry - any day now. Hopefully big Chinese order in June. Factory starts production end of July. Lots to look foreward to.

Have you had a reply from Fox regarding completion of the factory yet?

Be very wary of anything Winnifrith recommends - he's not necessarily on your side!

In4cedros apologies for the hand grenade - it was really just an innocent enquiry! Bunion was right I was refering to the March 2015 presentation p.13 where the cost of extracting heavy oil is identified as $60 per barrel. The Guardian article identifies it as $50. Thanks for all the very informative responses and apologies for not getting back sooner.

From one of MOIL's presentations it looks like the cost of extracting this oil is about $60 per barrel which makes it marginally profitable at current oil prices. Or have I misinterpreted this figure?

My cash burn figure is £10.5m against which I offset the annual recurring revenue of £8.4m, giving them more like a year. What is clear though, is that they must get new orders in order to close the gap between the two figures.

If you google 'Kosovo' and 'mafia' you will see some quite worrying results, including the name of the the current deputy PM Thaci.

The timing of the Illumina attack was calculated to be as destructive as possible. It aims to scare of customers just as Premaitha brings inthe first orders. It is also a sensitive time when investment is at its highest before revenue comes in Illumina could have raised these issues at any time over the previous two years. I hope that there is some recourse in law that recognises this and can award proportionate damages.