Member Info for Daveavt

Oh course he spouts crap, he is an over invested ramper. It's funny how people come on here, 'invested', trying to give advice, but the fact is 99.9 percent of rampers bought in too high, and are sitting at a loss. Why they think anyone should listen to the words of someone who isn't very good at investing is beyond me.

Where have you been, that news was over a week ago.

Exactly, they're not buying anything. Align work on being given shares in lieu of glowing company reports. They don't 'top up', or tell people. Tweet was a ramp.

Remind me when I get paid for stating facts, haven't seen a penny yet.

You know, you don't have to believe everything you read. Align are paid rampers, of course they will tweet they are trying to support something.

How can it be 'revolutionary'? You make it sound like they are the only ones doing it.

Ha, would be more than they currently have, yeah..

What do you mean why am I here?? These boards are for non invested people. Why are you here? You're invested. Why are you posting anything? What have you got to 'discuss', you've already made your decision, biased, and at a loss. So what have you got to talk about?

Of course that's why you're here, why else would you ramp?

Telling people you've filed a 'provisional patent application' is also a great way of misleading the general public into thinking you've filed a patent, which you haven't, and exactly the reason why the doctor avoided making ANY reference to a 'patent' when asked twice directly about it in the interview. He went on to talk about how good the mice were, and when asked again about the actual 'patent', he said we hope to market them to customers. He specifically skirted around any mention of a patent or even answered the question, so as not to implicate.

'A provisional patent application establishes an early filing date, but does not mature into an issued patent unless the applicant files a regular non-provisional patent application within one year. A provisional application, as such, is never examined by the USPTO, and therefore will never become a patent on its own (unless the provisional patent application is later converted into a non-provisional patent application by the applicant, and then the application is examined as a non-provisional application). The provisional application is also not "published", but becomes a part of any later non-provisional application file that references it, and thus becomes "public" upon issuance of a patent claiming its priority benefit.'

No they have NOT made a 'patent application', how many times. Jesus Christ. It says what they have filed in the rns, a 'provisional patent application', which is NOT applying for a patent.

Why do you keep referring to a question asked by an interviewer? He obviously doesn't know what a 'provisional patent application' is either. And if you listen to the doctors response he explicity AVOIDS mentioning any patent, even when asked about it twice. Check the following question on the video, the interviewer brings up the 'patent' again, again the doctor makes no reference to the word or implication.

it says in the companies rns it has filed a 'provisional patent application', which is not a patent filing. It gives you no 'patent pending', no patent 'number', until they actually file a non provisional patent within 12 months. If they don't, it's scrapped. Even if you file a patent, it's still not granted, it's just published. So for you to keep saying 'patented mice model', is either you don't know what you're talking about, or disagreeing what is written in the company rns, or lying for your own agenda. Pick one of those three, because there isn't a patent....

Shukan once again lying about 'patented' mouse models. Also probably not aware that humanised mice for AML already exist, from Jackson Laboratories.

Why is it worth fighting for? What makes hemo so special compared to say other companies in the same line of business that have already got results in vitro AND in vivo, and companies that already have humanized mice for use in AML? Please tell me what edge does this company have?

So you admit you are biased then, and trying to spread your bias over twitter? They don't have a patent, even applied for one, the results are in vitro, not in organisms, they throw out a tweet to boost share prices, use dubious align research reports...to boost share prices. Gonna disagree with any of that? Or just ignore it? You can ramp as much as you like, but the market doesn't agree with you.

Stating facts isn't 'spreading doubt'. It called being genuine, unlike the posters and yourself trying to hide it.

Why do you keep lying about the patent?. It's been explained to you, yet you keep lying and making out they have a patent. Even if they had filed a non provisional patent, they still wouldn't have a patent. What part of 'they don't have a patent or even filed one', do you find it so hard to get? If you were so confident about this share, you wouldn't have to lie and keep spamming this board and twitter with standard copy and paste news releases. Potential investors look between the lines, hence why the price is dropping, not blindly invest on some tv fitters copy and pastes.

Why am I here, because when it comes to investing you have to pick holes in anything to make sure you're making the right choice, and be sceptical of everything. So yes, when you get blatant rampers trying to mislead new investors, then people like me, and I'm not the only one, will set it straight. So why are you here? Don't say the standard response of 'because I'm invested', why are you *here*..on this forum. There is no need to write stuff, you're already invested, what have you got to talk about? And you're biased obviously. Unless you have something to contribute, that's factual, no one needs you here.