Member Info for Daveavt

Ah well. So you think they could match that do you. I tend to roll my eyes when someone predicts future revenues of a company...you even predicted how much they could sell this hypothetical non existent product for. It's a bit like me saying I want to start a car company and therefore I could be as big as Ford, and hence I can could sell my company for a few hundred million dollars. First, they need to patent the product, without a granted patent it's worthless. Then you can start talking about revenues.

Jackson labs provides mice for many strains as you know, humanized ones for a myriad of conditions and diseases, and only has revenues of 300k a year. So maybe you need to rethink your fantasy revenues just a bit.

Of course he could, he said he sold on the spike last week and probably averaged down since the 28th

No problem at all John, just wish everyone would listen. Cheers.

How are those 'patented 50k mice'? Come on, give me some more gems...

Say I'm a plank a few more times, see what it does to the share price. Seems my comments are 'worthless', as you seem to think they make the share price 'worth less'. What tvs you fitted today?

Pumped or dumped is is for pumpers, I'm on there because I copy and paste pumpers comments in my replies. Maybe you don't know how the site works. Anyway, instead of trying to change the subject, how about answering the question?

Why do you think being main market makes any difference than being aim. Most of the investors are aim type people, it's pumped and dumped on twitter etc like aim, it's high volatility like aim, and it's priced in the pennies like aim. It doesn't make any difference to the people buying and selling, it's just regulations and how big / small the company is.

Good for the company, just not good for the share price, as unfortunately the market thinks the signing of 3 contracts with major pharmas is worth 5.75p.

What are you on about 'trashing the share'? Anyways I'm sure you're boring the tits off everyone, including me, because all you have talked about all day long is me, Jack has been doing the same. How about you talk about the share with no ramping, hypothesing, fantasy scenarios yada yada instead of me. This is share discussion, not Dave discussion, if you're gonna post something at least make it about the company, or don't post at all, it's not compulsory you know. I'm only replying to people's attempted taunts..

You've missed the point again, I don't think all the poor investors locked in at ten pence and above following rampers like yourself give a toss about someone making 30 percent down at 5p. Try thinking about other people for a change.

Yes, isn't 6k a poor return on 20k, because this share will be Lucky to make 30 percent gains ONLY if you bought in sub 5. My words, for sure. and if it doesn't go below 5, I won't even bother.

Actually amazing, the crap and misleading stuff and blatant lies that will come out of rampers mouths. I just said I would buy in when it's low enough because I don't think the price will top 7 or 8p, and I'd have to buy in that price because of the risk, end rampers are trying to dress it up as it 'has merit and wings'. No, were not singing from the same hymnsheet. Yours is trying to mislead and swindle people, mine is factual and risk management.

Yorkshire is now trying to ramp myself. No Yorkshire, it doesn't have wings, rockets, booms. Is there no end to your underhand tactics?

Jack are you still filtering me, because you keep saying 'I've missed a trade' but I haven't as it didn't reach my buy in price.

Yes it does, Max of about 7 to 8p on news as we have seen over and over. Hence why I'd have to throw in 20k to make 6k on my margins.

Not with volume. No different to saying it touched above 7 on a sell, it's all spikes, you can't buy or sell decent volume with it. Even rhulmes post showed it had the ask at 5.00 on the dot.

Yes, if the ask gets below 5p then yes, build a holding of say 20k. That's the only issue though, volume available. It's no point it spiking below for a moment, it needs to be there with stability.

It wasn't under 5p on ask and it wasn't 40 percent profit, it was at best 30 percent taking out the spread. First we have Jack claiming 50 percent, you now 40 percent, where as its about 30 percent, best case scenario, if your buying and selling little amounts. I think most of you have never traded large chunks, so don't realise that you can't just get rid of a holding at the peak in one go. Also, it's all moot, because how many of you lot sitting a loss also didn't make the 30 gain either?

Of course you want me to disappear, I'm messing up the dodgy sales pitch!