Member Info for Daveavt

Oh dear, the conspiracy theorists who are obsessed with me are out again. Maybe you lot are all the same people? I mean you all say the same stuff, and have all been wrong, and are all obsessed about me. Coincidence much??

I only post this much to wind Jack up..

Bangers, how about realise all the other sock companies are currently ahead of this company in the same field of sock development, so don't just believe what you hear on the sockvine...

because as I said, most industries have massive market values, so it really doesn't matter. I used socks as a joke, but for instance every one wears socks, there are 8 billion people on the planet, most people have at least ten pairs, and I don't think I've ever paid less than £1 a pair. Jesus, it's a 80 billion pound market, even if it was 50p a pair it's still many tens of billions...See what I mean...

Albinio, yes I'm gonna tell you by a leaked tweet I've had a breakthrough in sock design, and I'm gonna tell you I'm gonna try and file a patent for my socks. All you have currently is my word on this though. How much money you wanna give me?

'Potentially superior products'. You're telling people to invest and all you can supply is 'hopes' and hypotheticals. So no, it's not better. Wait till you have something more concrete.

Ralphie raised a flag last night regarding the grant project from 2016/17 which has just been completed. In the original rns outlining the project it says this... 'In the third part of the project, the Oxford Academic Health Science Network will develop an economic case and support the creation of a commercialisation plan for the tool. Once a prototype has been successfully developed, further funding is likely to be required to create a fully distributable commercial tool.' Anyone know where this funding is meant to be coming from?

Scot, the amount of ramper posts that out number mine ten to 1 are even more tiresome, but you don't see me moaning. I wouldn't mind, but they are already invested, and have nothing to discuss, so I don't even know why they are posting.

I said my *last* trade was 500, and I only made that because when I reach a target I want to buy on dips I start to accumulate, I don't buy in one chunk, so I'd only accumulated a small amount by the time the next news hit, hence it only made 500 quid. And if you go back to the post you keep referencing to I quite clearly call it crumbs, why not go back and see the other posts where I made a couple of grand on each, they are there. So anyway Jack, SIX500

6500 quid, Jack is there something wrong with your phone or computer, you can't see 6s? Do they not show up? Do I have to write it as SIX? And there seems to be an issue with you registering time scales too? 24/7? That would imply I write continuously every minute of every hour of every day. I may write as a push ten comments a day, replying to yours or others rubbish, at say 30 seconds to write a comment. That's 300 seconds a day. 5 minutes out of every day. That's 600 minutes over 4 months, 10 hours. To make 6500 quid. That's 650 quid an hour of active posting. We all know maths isn't your strong point, but try and get close. This comment took me about a minute and a half with having to do the calculations, so to be fair I'm currently at 649.99999 quid an hour posting, but I'll let you have that one lol. Anyway, how's that 100p coming on?

I can't stand it when rampers, on any share, say things like 'part of a market worth X billion yada yada'. So what? Nearly every industry in the world is worth billions. The sock making industry is worth 'billions', if I start making socks will you invest in me? Every business has a 'potential' revenue stream, every company has 'potential' customers. Jesus. You just described every single company on the planet. The world is your oyster, on that logic go and invest in anything...

Jack, 6500 quid, normally you bang on about only 500, now it's a 'few hundred'. You've got a real bee in your bonnet about me making money investing in and out of shares haven't you. Seems to really tear you up inside a bit. So how I'm 'wasting my life in here for nothing' is a bit hypocritical considering the amount of time you spend on here, advfm and your multiple twitter profiles when you've made less than nothing, in fact sitting at a loss. Would you like some tips?

Ralphie, oh dear, I know that...my point was your wording of it. I thought that was quite clear in my comment.

Jack's needs his comfort blanket again..

I couldn't find on that link where it indicated 'Physiomics latest completed project Personalised Treatment of Oesophageal Cancer, is being publicised at the next AACR meeting in Chicago'...I could see them doing a talk titled 'A decision support system for the treatment of esophageal cancer' though.

Of course not, every share depends on price. And if you truly believe I can bring a share price down by what I type on this board then you'd be really stupid to 'top up' as by your logic I can drag it down to wherever I like, lower than your top up. The real truth is the market, which consists of thousands of people, believes it's worth this price currently or below. Anyway, you didn't answer my question of why you are here, as your last two posts have nothing to do with the share, and were about me. This is share talk, not bleeding life story talk..stick to the topic.

Why would you be overtly positive about anywhere you invest money. Always invest on utmost scepticsm. Also these boards are for non invested people to discuss a share, warts and all, like me and the guy below. If you're already invested and made your decision, what more have you got to talk about, so why are you here? If your comments are just going to be pointless cheerleadIng, hypotheticals, there is no point to it and it just clogs the boards.

But this is the point many people have been making...bogus 'leaked' tweet, suspect align research article, provisional filing which costs a mere few hundred dollars and makes average Joe think they have a patent being filed when it can be left to expire in 12 months, 'collaboration' news release of simply a continuation with a company they have already been dealing with. That's why eyebrows have been raised, as this is all share pumping stuff and I'd actually want to see the patent being filed. Their brief description of 'humanised mouse with chimeric blood system' already exists. Maybe they have just found a way of doing it slightly differently, and that's what they want to patent, but whether it gives them any kind of monopoly or exclusivity is yet to be seen.

It actually sounds like who ever this Bio is, helps with the mouse project to develop it. It may actually be one of the mouse suppliers. You have to work out what 'a deal worth' means. It doesn't say it's income. It could be worth 250k to them as a saving. Work could be done for them that is worth 250k. Again it's all hypotheses, I don't really care for that. We could be completely barking down the wrong tree so I only stick to what I see, other wise that's how people go on a ramp fest. End of the day, until you actually see them file a patent, then you'll know they are more serious, end even then a filing isn't a granting, and going by your logic of delaying it as much as possible, we wouldn't see that until 23.9 months away. And full grants, if they go through, normally 2 to 3 years.

They already had a collaboration with this company, it says so in the rns. This is not a new client or collaboration, a continuance, hence why it made no dent in the share price.