RE: Centami comms4 Apr 2018 14:09
This is what I thought as it would be very unlike any mining company to report weekly shipments as it doesn't really tell us much, especially when a company is selling at spot. The only figures that I take notice of are those provided on a quarterly basis.
Also it is extremely difficult to guess at what the company could produce if they pulled out all of the stops as there are far too many factors to take into account over the whole year. We saw last year the impact of a cut back where the strip ratio of waste to ore increased.
Just let me provide you with one small example of something that the mine has to contend with as the hole in the ground gets deeper inevitably the distance that each truck travels is longer and gradually over time the number of truck loads per hour delivering to the crusher/ waste dump gets fewer, so do you increase the number of trucks? maybe , but do you have enough loaders to cope with extra trucks? can you flatten out the haul roads or can you improve the haul roads and the questions go on, if so what are the cost implications.
Given that at quoted grades of 0.70 with a cut off grade of 0.30 per tonne both of which are pretty much what some old spoil heaps were generating as waste produced back in the day when mine processes were nowhere near as efficient as they are today, small changes in the production cycle has a significant effect on production.
I take my hat off to the efficiencies at Sukari as they still predict increases in annual production given the above and believe me there are so many more factors involved and efficiencies are so so crucial to the continued success of any mine.
Alexandra if you are reading then what I think we on this board would like to see is where and how quickly the company will be spreading the risk namely generating revenue from more than just Egypt.
A timeline relating to growth would be very useful.