RE: Take over23 Aug 2022 00:12
Senta, Hit the nail on the head :
"important to understand that neither The Takeover Panel nor Code are designed to decide on whether a fair price is being offered or if the deal makes sense for the businesses concerned. That is for the shareholders to decide for themselves."
You Just need over 50% agreement. So hypothetically if MBU like a deal and Adam and Co did, then its a done deal. This is exactly what happened in Thinksmart, that I wrote about below. Go and look and read the comments as it unfolded from January 2022. What was worth £1.30 now is now 36p back to shareholders, many bought above a £1, saw there investment half on the sale agreed RNS in January (myself included).
Majority ownership is not a good thing, and will also deter institutional investors. Most will not invest in outfits, where they have no voting power. If you consider all major changes to the company will be voted on (even re-election of jobs on the board), but in this case what ever MBU want to do will win, regardless of any vote. TSL is a good story from this year of shafting investors by majority voting. That aside, what happens when MBU want to sell down? Recall what happened last November when owner of Hochschild sold a huge chunk (20% from memory), the gap down (November 2021) is quite clear on the chart (its still effectively a placing, but of existing shares not new ones). I personally would avoid these set ups, unless they are long established family businesses and already stable and cash generative. Looking at the table linked below, Dunelm are a good company to invest in, and the family own 55% there. But as I say, what surprises could Dunelm spring on shareholders, and they are FTSE so tighter regulated. https://www.hl.co.uk/news/articles/archive/why-family-owned-companies-tend-to-outperform
PS, Im not the reason any of you lost money or are trapped here now. Last time i bought in to BEN, I did believe it would re-rate back to at least 80p, but subsequently we had an operation update that was mediocre with lower sales than ramped / promised, then the flooding (which he glossed over in the RNS, but obviously was damage incurred), then the placing, and the forward selling that goes with it. So yes, I traded my way out, in other words, I bought lower down, and sold higher up to break even. I would of sold, higher or lower, as I went on holiday the next day and wanted rid, so not to be worrying about it on holiday. Not trying to talk anyone out of investing here, but the posters asking about majority ownership need to hear why it isnt usually a good thing on AIM. Another red flag here I am afraid.