The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Macman,
My apologies
You obviously can read!
Stonk,
He's like the other Mac, can write but can't read....
Hippo,
That's more like flying a light aircraft through the Alps in low cloud
And the co-pilot/instructor is saying there are a quite a few risks here
You are hearing "we're going to crash! we're going to crash!"
St,
I bought 100k this morning on your recommendation
(don't worry its my choice!)
Looking forward to seeing where it will go
JL
No probs and thanks!
JL
I'm very open to the discussion of Risk
I'm not that confident, but think it's likely to be higher than this in a year's time
This was a top up, and yes I am down at the moment....
GH
Our posts crossed - but you have emphasized exactly the same words!
Bizu,
Occam would obviously agree with you
But isn't the simplest explanation:
"The Directors are confident that the *ability* to allot securities and *demonstrate* a capacity to develop the Kola PGM and battery metals district independently of other strategic options available to the Company benefits the Company and its Shareholders by improving Eurasia's negotiating position" (my emphasis on key words as I see them )
which appears to support Tobler's ingenious theory
But isn't it really just saying that irrespective of the FSP we have a viable funded business? Ergo we don't NEED to sell
which is #5 in the Spurs analysis
Mike,
Not by intent, but I mostly seem to be in mining and oil
I think this was a Zak Mir mention, then saw TBTT was in...
Mike,
The 500k at 08:32 was me, and it was a Buy
I thought everyone on Telegram was a loyal follower!
(except me of course - but I don't post there - and I have definitely voted for)
Ian_
why the %^&*% did they vote against?
MM, Monkey
Makes sense to me!
I think the timing does mean something is happening!
spurs,
yes think that's right
Still trying to get over the 1967 FA cup final!
stix, shouldn't you have done it the other way round :-)
does your vote include the new shares - is what I'm getting at
MM,
You know me, I never like to say anything negative about EUA - I don't like wasps
But, the question arises what is the sudden urgency to do this now, and not wait for the AGM?
Another option is they have spent a lot of dosh with DLA already, and want to continue negotiating to get a better deal
Dore,
not sure the exact reason is important - I think we can all agree the BoD believe that to demonstrate the ability to raise cash stengthens their position
Is this the rule?
GFD there?
"On a show of hands at a general meeting, a majority of not less than 75% if it is passed by not less than 75% of the votes cast by those entitled to vote (section 283(4), Companies Act 2006)."
oldspursfan,
it's a regular part of each AGM, so will roll on from then assuming it passes, so this is just to tide them over until then
I'm really not suggesting EUA will run out of cash at all, but the motion being passed means it is public that they have access to additional cash for any reasons they choose
It's a bit late for people to be asking "why should I vote" if you own shares, and therefore can vote, then you should vote in favour. I think absolutely everyone who has an opinion on this board agrees with that
I think they need 75% of all votes available , so lethargy is the potential showstopper, nothing else
Dore,
My take is this is to prevent a "Buyer's strike" where buyers all hold back waiting for EUA to run out of cash
The very fact EUA can raise cash is all that is required, they don't actually need to do it