London South East | The UK's favourite investor portal.

In case you missed it, this is what I posted:

"If you want to compare the good with the bad. The go take a look at the latest interview with Colin King, the CEO of Omega Diagnostics. Interview is out this morning, he has answered every single question that any investor would want to see answered. There is no new news or material updates in that interview, it's all been covered in previous RNS's. But Colin has been very public and very open and honest in his responses, including the following statement:

"Don't forget that one of the key obligations we have as Directors of an AIM listed company is to ensure that our communications aren't "misleading, false or deceptive" and that we don't "omit anything to affect the import of such information" (Colin King, CEO of ODX, AIM listed)

I wonder if the CEO of UKOG will do an interview this year, if he does I bet that he only focuses on Turkey. He'll probably prepare the questions and then answer them. He would not want to be asked the difficult questions and give honest answers to them.

1) What is the short, medium and long-term plan for the Horse Hill site?
2) Will you be dual completing the HH1 well to produce from Kimmeridge and Portland as previously announced?
3) What is the current state of HH2z conversation to a water injector / pressure support well? How much cash is needed for that?
4) What is the current cash position, how much do UKOG have in the bank and will a placing be needed for Turkey?
5) What are your plans for BB, be honest, is it just a delaying tactic to avoid plugging and abandonment costs?
6) Will shareholders have to wait until the annual filings to see what you were paid and how much of a reduction you took, was it 50% or was it 20%, why were you so coy on this in the RNS?
7) What are your views on company performance and bonus, do you think it is fair to reward yourself with a bonus given the decimation of shareholder value?
8) Is there a reason why you haven't bought any shares in UKOG? Why is this the case, do you not see the concerns from the market and its impact on the SP in you having no skin in the game?
9) Can you update us on IoW, will it be something that UKOG pursue or is it going to be set aside given your forays into Turkey?
10) What timetable do you place on drilling HH3 at Horse Hill, will this realistically happen, or is it the view that the site is not worth further investment?

That's 10 for starters. Who else would like to see the CEO do a proper interview and answer these questions? Should a CEO be allowed to remain in position if he refuses to uphold the integrity expected of him?"

If you want to compare the good with the bad. The go take a look at the latest interview with Colin King, the CEO of Omega Diagnostics. Interview is out this morning, he has answered every single question that any investor would want to see answered. There is no new news or material updates in that interview, it's all been covered in previous RNS's. But Colin has been very public and very open and honest in his responses, including the following statement:

"Don't forget that one of the key obligations we have as Directors of an AIM listed company is to ensure that our communications aren't "misleading, false or deceptive" and that we don't "omit anything to affect the import of such information" (Colin King, CEO of ODX, AIM listed)

I wonder if the CEO of UKOG will do an interview this year, if he does I bet that he only focuses on Turkey. He'll probably prepare the questions and then answer them. He would not want to be asked the difficult questions and give honest answers to them.

1) What is the short, medium and long-term plan for the Horse Hill site?
2) Will you be dual completing the HH1 well to produce from Kimmeridge and Portland as previously announced?
3) What is the current state of HH2z conversation to a water injector / pressure support well? How much cash is needed for that?
4) What is the current cash position, how much do UKOG have in the bank and will a placing be needed for Turkey?
5) What are your plans for BB, be honest, is it just a delaying tactic to avoid plugging and abandonment costs?
6) Will shareholders have to wait until the annual filings to see what you were paid and how much of a reduction you took, was it 50% or was it 20%, why were you so coy on this in the RNS?
7) What are your views on company performance and bonus, do you think it is fair to reward yourself with a bonus given the decimation of shareholder value?
8) Is there a reason why you haven't bought any shares in UKOG? Why is this the case, do you not see the concerns from the market and its impact on the SP in you having no skin in the game?
9) Can you update us on IoW, will it be something that UKOG pursue or is it going to be set aside given your forays into Turkey?
10) What timetable do you place on drilling HH3 at Horse Hill, will this realistically happen, or is it the view that the site is not worth further investment?

That's 10 for starters. Who else would like to see the CEO do a proper interview and answer these questions? Should a CEO be allowed to remain in position if he refuses to uphold the integrity expected of him?

Penguins, maybe I did not explain what I meant by central government and my description was a poor one.

My view is that it should be a central planning agency, not a party political matter. An independent body of civil servants providing the service. Is that a better description?

Get this away from the CC's asap, they cannot be trusted to make decisions with their allegiances to various causes. e.g. Penny Rivers will never ever vote to support any mineral application that seeks to explore/develop/produce oil or gas, because she is simply against fossil fuels and is an XR sympathiser.

Let the CC's decide where to place dog foul bins, but take away O&G and other mineral planning matters. It's way above their level of competence, knowledge and pay grades (lol).

Take some of the comments in the 2nd hearing of the Loxley SCC hearing. Oh my dear, councillors voting on something when they don't have the basic knowledge of the industry or the attention to detail in the plans, then refuting and disagreeing with the regulatory bodies (e.g. highways agency).

e.g. When did CC councillors become highways agency experts? Could they ever stand up in a court of law and make representation as subject matter experts? So why do they think that they should ignore the opinion and recommendations of the experts that presented to them on the very matter and make statements that are clearly wrong and unjust?

To draw comparisons with the legal process. If a judge in a case believes that the jurors would be wrong to consider statements or suppositions made by the prosecution or defence, then the judge will instruct the jurors to ignore those statements and not to consider when coming to their verdict. The judge would ordinarily sustain or overrule objections based on sound legal grounds. If this rule were applied to the SCC hearing in relation to Loxley, then the councillors would be told that they cannot and should not use highways as a reason for refusal. The chairman (and his legal counsel) in this case takes the role of laying down the principles to the councillors. But unlike the judge, their words are often ignored.

I don't need to harp on about SCC, there are countless other examples out there of completely incompetent and inept councils and councillors who shouldn't be trusted to make decisions about anything above the category of dog foul bins.

Ozzy,

Sorry, did I annoy you? I did not mean to do that. I am simply asking very basic questions that are fundamental to the future prospects of UKOG.

Do you not like the questions? Do you not have simple answers and facts to knock my views back?

If so, then share the answers on the Kim. I'd really like to be given some factual evidence as to why UKOG have decided to abandon any further investment into trying to get the Kim to flow.

I mean come on, it was supposed to be 1 MILLION barrels per well for Kim, that is a huge amount of oil and huge revenue/profit. So why are they not doing anything with it in favour of the Portland play.

p.s. suggest you go look at how much oil was pulled out the Portland at Brockham. The geology is not that different and its barely 5 miles away I reckon. So do you thin that HH will produce millions of barrels from the Portland? Wait you may say, Angus are going back to Brockham with the intent to try out some water injection to support well pressure to squeeze some more oil out. Unfortunately, there is only so much you can squeeze out on these immature plays.

If it is too much and your head hurts from the prospect of having to do some proper research, then don't worry, there is the looming opportunity in Turkey where UKOG are going to try and pin the tail on the donkey. Problem there is that the Turkey play is also a short term player with huge depletion and not something that will be operational for 3+ years. Its a quick smash and grab with rather pathetic returns on investment. However.... there appears to be a potential issue with AME who are rumoured to be looking at finance from a different player, so UKOG may never get to have their Xmas dinner after all. Oops, more research needed there, you better go dig deep into the Turkey / AME research and try to figure out what I mean. If I could sum it up in one word... well I can... it is "ouch" 9I do love my contacts in the Middle East and my wife who's a translator. (she can even look at posts here and convert ballacks into plain english).

Enjoy the weekend, try not to get to hung up on reality, maybe stick to the PS4 or Xbox.

Latest Share Chat

Member Info for CynderLad

Followers

Following

Posts (Last 30 Days)

Posts (All Time)

Last Post

Member Since

Share Chat Post Distribution (Last 30 Days)

Activity Log (Last 30 Days)