RE: National Pboo Awareness Day2 Feb 2022 13:03
Tranquillo,
I have answered this question before.
I remain interested because I think that with a different board in place and with an honest CEO, it could be a decent little company. Alas, there is but a glimmer of hope, and much of that depends on a complete restructure of the company, getting shot of the overpaid execs, and putting someone with a wholehearted allegiance to shareholders into the top role.
The licence areas are what they are, unfortunately, the past projects, strategy and results are all reflective of a board that are as clued up as a headless chicken. The venture into Turkey is yet another example of that, big cash raise, hue dilution, to fund a drill in a dead duck play.
Get shot of the board, get shot of the CEO, reduce the staff costs, do away with IoW and Loxley, focus on HH and turning the company to one of loss into one of profit. I'm all for onshore O&G exploration, development and production; but I am dead against lifestyle CEO's that cower from the basic questions, dodge interviews and provide half-truths in RNS's, and fail in their obligations to deliver against RNSs.
Is that sufficient for you? I'd love nothing more than to invest in another on-shore O&G player, but it has to be run properly and has to have a decent strategy and then deliver on that strategy.
I am invested in ANGS (short-term for SFB / potential sale), UJO (but starting to sell out) and OEX (Cambay field re-start with huge volumes of gas). I do not live in Surrey, I'm not a NIMBY, I'm not a Green.
So, do feel free to copy and paste the above into a file and save it on your PC. Then you can revisit it any time you like.