Member Info for Culpepper

So, I think, as you might, it’s possible to see some form of non-dilutive finance to further Black Angel, accompanied by off-take agreements, and maybe a hand in the Gardaq joint venture exploration activities.

You’re right. But the article suggests the US would ‘not necessarily’ have to invest in gold projects. I think that’s the nub of it.

The author seems reasonably well informed, in that the letter of interest, for Amaroq specifically, has not previously been mentioned.

‘Do I really need to point out the obvious.’

No. It was not a requirement or request.

Make what you will of it.

https://www.sugfeed.com/post/us-investment-greenland-mining-amaroq-minerals

Iceland closed £1.16.

Canada, still open, getting a little resurgence just now. £1.22.

Haha. Just guessing the three markets will converge around 117/118.

More to come, as year progresses.

No. I said it was reported - as it was.

Your facts trump my reading as posted here

And it’s still just about pegging even over a year……

It’s possible to have different views on that.

Rule of thumb though says price not in line with progress.

There you go.

“I'm sure NST would have tried for Havieron/Telfer if they thought they stood a chance MFU.”

Theyre reported as saying they weren’t interested.

For the same reasons as Znewmont chose to divest.

They bid it up to £1.20, on recent comments.

Been that before.

Doesnt take much imagination to see it again, after the years excellent operational progress, against a much slower sp.

At the moment, it seems settling/advancing, as punters/investors consider what might lie ahead.

There’s loads in the pipeline, all to the good.

Though I may be put right by the less optimistic. Mr.Olafsson, is plainly pleased as punch.

You know, I think it’s establishing a new base level on its own account, possibly in line with what USA may see in its attraction globally.

Wherever the price goes from here, it will reflect investor expectations.

I don’t think Canada will push on.

More likely drop, profit taking, to London Iceland consensus.

A good thing, determine shareholder feelings on the future.

Everyone reckons their own shares are cheap.

You see it across the boards.

Whether they are cheap or not, I think they’re value, will be determined in 12 months.

Not a bad thing on the sp. Holding so far. Maybe this is a new base level, but can’t tell. Iceland same price.

I imagine Canada will take profit to London and Iceland level, when it opens.

It’s done, and continues to do, very well.

There appears to be going on enough in the bank to finance Havieron. Without taking on debt - though they may do so, as previously thought before Telfer was rejuvenated, Hav being the objective, utilising Telfer.

Telfer is still under scrutinity, awaiting projections, which will have to do with Hav commercial production timing.

I expect they’ve done their sums, from a purely company perspective.

Closer to Hav, the more it goes up the value curve.

“What I have seen of Eldur, I believe it to be the latter. So for me, that particular comment really stood out. Be good also, to get a further quote from Eddie Wyvill on what they need to demonstrate resource wise and how they are moving toward that goal.”

Ignoring the probability ( as it seems to me ) of international interest- I can’t.

There’s a whole host of stuff in the pipeline to bring projects up the value curve over the year, without going into detail.

Optimising Nalunaq, improving recovery rates, whilst resource drilling.

Assessing the raw results published for Nanoq, whilst further exploring, and drilling to publish maiden resource.

Resource drilling at Black Angel, and having a look at what’s within the ‘West Greenland Hub’

Hydro power business - lesser energy costs.

Suliaq business ( which should do well based on increasing mining interest in Greenland.)

Theyre prime movers. I note Mr. Olafsson steered away when questioned about Amaroq being a takeover target - deflecting to a sort of best position as a company in Greenland response.

Well, it’s not taken off yet quite in the way Canada did yesterday, on news USA was ‘mulling over’ whether to become involved in Amaroq.

I think it’s generally accepted though, if USA/Europe are to invest in Greenland mining,it would be more than likely through Amaroq.

As Howezap indicates, firmer news may come, of great assistance in furthering Amaroq plans.

Bit more on that, summarising.

https://www.mining.com/greenland-miner-amaroq-soars-on-report-of-us-govt-investment/

Straight out of AI for ease. For those who see something in nearology.

‘Amaroq Minerals' Sava licence area is located adjacent to the Ilimaussaq complex, which hosts the Tanbreez deposit. The licences are in close proximity within the Gardar Province in South Greenland.

While the specific licensed areas for exploitation may not directly share a boundary point-for-point, they are immediately next to the geological complex that contains the Tanbreez project. The companies operate in the same overall mineral belt, a region known for significant rare earth element (REE) potential. ‘