Member Info for Culpepper

Well, soft power through investment, plus an enhanced military presence.

In relation to critical metals, they would still need a stake in a company, and American interest already furthered in the Tanbreez development ( abutting/overlapping Amaroq ground )through Critical Metals Corp with non dilutive debt facility, offtake agreements and talk of future equity.

And the way things are going, Europe won’t want to left out.

Quite apart from normal, previously anticipated updates, what Mr. Olafsson puts across as what the prospective Nanoq ‘ elephant’ might mean for the company going forward, next episode, will be quite revealing on investors’ future prospects.

Old news really, but strategic position and mineral rights coming to fore, again, following Venezuelan.

Does no harm to Amaroq profile, maybe particularly of interest to the American investors.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/04/greenland-denmark-us-venezuela-nicolas-maduro-donald-trump

Conviction Plays

‘We’re retaining Amaroq and Sovereign Metals for 2026, for the same reasons as in 2025. Amaroq will corner Greenland, is going to start spitting out gold at a rate that puts its market cap to shame, may have a Tier 1 discovery on their hands in Nanoq - and will almost certainly attract government cheese this year.’

https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=1504413&post_id=183098370&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=4xupfa&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyOTg3MjQ2NjIsInBvc3RfaWQiOjE4MzA5ODM3MCwiaWF0IjoxNzY3MzY1MjY4LCJleHAiOjE3Njk5NTcyNjgsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0xNTA0NDEzIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.S8NmZNc9OM4oqs1LuYDJ5M77jWYhokRqo2AE6u-TPHs

‘Culpepper, I'm glad you didn't say - a local mine for local people.’

People talk of being LTH’s since 30% Hav. LTHs.

On that basis, I expect them still to be here in 3 or 4 years - saying much the same thing.

Don’t you?

There’s little doubt, is there, that the share price, on fundamentals, eps, is dependent on Telfer revenue/profit until Hav produces commercially, taking into account the cost of Telfer and Hav development.

I don’t see how anyone can expect fireworks - it’ll be a process. And RNS rather than punter ‘foresight’, will prevail.

A long term hold for long term holders.

“If this was happening to any of my 'proper' shares (as opposed to a punt) I'd be pretty pleased to say the least”

Your continuing view of Amrq, as a punt, as things have progressed, is no longer mine.

Anyway, easy reference, I don’t think you do without increasing punter/investor confidence 37% in 6 months, 19% in a month, 11% in 5 days, whilst despite progress, Amrq is still only 3% up over the year( Archer writes that off as the ‘Trump’ effect - Trump rather boringly, subject of unconnected comment on here, previous posts, goodness knows why )

Amaroq is the first of its kind in Greenland.

They see a market arising from future entrants, having done their research, hence Suliaq.

Mr. Olafsson refers to Nanoq as an ‘elephant’.

It’s my view that there is still doubt among punters around the geography, that Greenland is profitable.

It is again, only my view, that Amaroq will progress as on evidence, reservations dissipate.

Having brought Nalunaq into re-production, there appears no reason why they cannot do thei same with Black Angel, and then over time develop the infrastructure for Nanoq. As I see it, a company maker, on revenue from Nalunaq, and then Black Angel.

Long term hold.

Perhaps depends when you need to cash some, or all, in.

The object of the entire exercise was to bring Hav into production, and process the ore.

That hasn’t changed from a long term perspective, them as view themselves in a much hackneyed way as LTHs. Though some of them dither about it, reviewing end of this year, and so on.

There’ll be ups and maybe downs as Telfer updates come out, between now and Hav commercial, profitable operation.

My own, guess is all, that Mr. Olafsson thinks his company is under priced, notable operational advances/discoveriies, and discovery potential, going insufficiently recognised. Not least with Nanoq.

And he’s becoming a little less restrained in his public views.

All the best.

They have to shape it up for sale. Taking longer for Mxc partners to sell up their company assets and retire.

They’ve every reason, personally, to do the best they can with it.

“The Nanoq Gold Project and what it could mean going forward.”

Going to be very positive potentially, or it would not have been forward led in that way.

Coming soon.

https://www.linkedin.com/company/amaroqminerals/posts/?feedView=all

However you look at it, on top of forthcoming full year of mining/processing at Nalunaq, the text of both the Nanoq RNS of 10th December

Amaroq Minerals Regulatory News. Live AMRQ RNS. Regulatory News Articles for Amaroq Ltd. Com Shs Npv (di)

and the earnings call, a one off specifically arranged, AMAROQ LTD (AMRQ.V) Q3 FY2025 earnings call transcript

indicates beyond much doubt the Nanoq project is far from speculation. It seems to be just the sheer scale of it that will, as Mr. Olafsson says, maybe take years to determine, whilst mining underway.

Iceland doing OK too. Hit £1.06, now back to £1.04, current exchange rate.

Brief mention, Mr. Archer, 9.50. Nothing new.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fptfIn0w1Y

I see Amrq hit £1.11, current exchange rate, Toronto, 24th.

Some of you are plainly nuts, conflicting a pi view with your own company investment. Not to say you won’t trade on the back of Bamps, as he says he has.

Get your own grip, instead of, like some, being led by the nose.

Pathetic today.

i think it’s all *******s. posturing.

though i do think usa, and europe, will be at least considering how best to achieve soft political advantage, and security of rare earths/strategic metals, , not gold, in greenland.

I, like most, find it quite hilarious.

A snapshot into some posters’ underbellies