RE: McNol21 Jul 2025 08:30
So Mcnol, good to see you back.
My first tuppence worth - this last RNS and fund raise seems to be to be something of a deft piece of "slight of hand" and begs and prompts a number of questions and observations.
Firstly, the "slight of hand" - this moves just seems to be a deliberate and direct tactic to circumvent the BoD's inability of issuing more shares through deferring that dilution for 12 months. At that time the company will still n9t have "surplus" income as Galactica income is due for re-investment into the further 9 well drill programme and Rukwa will not yet be in production or, at the very best, will be producing very little - hence repayment at that time will require a $10 m pro rata dilution at a 20% discount to sp...
Secondly the acquisiotn of He1's 50% stake in Galactica of 27th August 2024 coincided with a "Raise" of £.6.43m / $8.2m that was justified for raising the below:
· US$1.5 million in respect of past costs incurred by Blue Star on the Galactica Project;
· 100% of the costs in respect of six wells capped at US$450,000 per well;
· up to US$2.55 million in in respect of the Company's 50% participating interest share of the tie-back, installation andprocessing expenditures required for the development of the Galactica Project;
· the balance of US$1.18 million in respect of associated fees, legal costs and working capital and development contingencies.
Moreover that was then expected to fund the Galactica project to production on Q2 2025 with no mention of the need for any further funding.
And yet here we are now with the current £10m raise needed for, amongst other things;
"Additional funds will also be allocated to our USA helium-CO2 project, operated by Blue Star Helium, which will enable us to progress to first gas and cash flow in Q4 this year."
Indeed were told that £4.5m will be allocated to Galactica.
So what happened to the initial fund raised in the original raise? And why now, all of a sudden, do we need another $4.5m to facilitate that production in Q4?
The initial equation for the Galactica project was a total cost of £6.43m / $8.2m for eventual $2m HE1 income and another $1m CO2 production for an anticipated 5 year period ($15m in total) - that looked like a fairly compelling business case originally. Now we are told that to effect that $3m per annum income ($15m in total) we will end up spending £10.9m / $13.9m.........
That is NOT a compelling business case.