RE: AEX RNS1 Sep 2022 23:21
CP, with the price and conditions that ARA or, previously Wentworth, were paying for the 25% I think the "risk" is pretty minimal in any meaningful commercial sense. Indeed I would suspect it is as much about "control" and the simplification the JV arrangement as it is about potential upside - that is not in question, the price they are paying is even more of a fire sale valuation than they succesfully offered AEX.... the mistake from a SCIR shareholders perpsective was to accede the BoD's proposed change of strategy. Though that , I will freely admit, is easy to say with hindsight - most SCIR Shareholders agreed to it at the time and are now paying the price - a symptom, perhaps, of the fact that shareholers had totally unrealistic expectations of the sale price? There was only ever one buyer in town; the pitch was always rigged in favour of the "operators" - not to recognise that was short sighted in my view.
Water under the bridge maybe - though I see there are some advocating SCIR as being cheap as chips and totally undervalued; which must surely deny all recent history and experience but hey, that is none of my business, I sold out of SCIR long ago and hitched my Ntorya horses to AEX - as much by luck as judgement I hasten to add. Though I will repeat that I have minimal confidence of any "Portfolio Investment Companies" - If I want to invest in "collectives" I would rather trust my judgement to Investment Professionals not O&G technicians....