Member Info for CrustyPete

Sorry that should have said 1.375p not 1.35p

Moreover McNol you can still BUY in good size at 1.379p and cannot sell more than a few hundred thousand at 1.35p - cannot get a quote for 1m shares let alone 4m...

Of course you may be rigt McNol on the "news" front, though I just think it is a release of sustained and growing upward pressure - the MM's running short of stock or access to it.

Maybe McNol but if so I suspect we will only lose on MOnday what we gain tomorrow - I am not expecting much news between now and EWT completion. Will we get news re Helium shows in between? Well I was hoping so but I think we might have had that with the TD if so.

Can Buy all you like at 1.37p but cannot sell more than 1 million at 1.355p. So not likley to hold methinks.

1.35 - 1.40p

Apologies, in the time taken to rite it the speard has moved to 1.33 - 1.40p

1.33 - 1.35p - as you say now BLUE Chesh...

Which two MM's, Chesh out of interest?

I have just been offered 1.335p for 4,000,000 shares but could not BUY more than 1,000,000 at 1.3475p

Their Nomad is just as culpable for somewhat "loaded" PR themselves.... the last Liberium Broker Report was more than a little "one-eyed" with all the "caveats" well hidden. There are no rules precluding connected parties being "optimistic" - they just have to be very guarded about not being seen to be "misleading". There is nothing whatsovever wrong with He1 maxing out on any and every piece of PR that they can as long as it is "factual"..... there have been many in the past who trod a very thin line between optimistic and misleading but He1 manages to ensure that they are not even close to that line.

It would be wrong to read anything into these PR "tweets" or similar releases - they simply pander to those shareholders who continuously clamour for "MORE!!"... that is more info, more news, more smiles... and that is all they get on these snippets; nothing that could be (or should be ) misconstrued.

Just_us they do so because that's all they have; irrational soundsbites designed to scare the weak handed, rather than the conviction of the well researched and those that understand and accept the risks incvolved.

So Herbie, "is it worrying" NO, it is totally feckin understandable; they would be feckin daft to put more of their own money in.

Not quite Herbie but, so feckin what? Would you bother putting more money in when you already own 10% of the company via warrants? NO, and nor would I and for a multitude of reasons.

They have the right and the ability to hold 10% of the feckin' company between them via warrants, why oh why would they need any more!?

I believe (based on an O&G comparator) that technically it is the subsidiaries that will "own" the exploration licences and, in time, the Mining License and therefore the underlying assets. There are legilative and tax reasons for this. However as He1 owns the subsidiaries 100% (notwithstanding any Tanz back-in rights?) fundamentally He1 indirectly owns them all.

In would tend to agree CHabuddy, though I think this RNS provides as much data as we could have expected at this time - anything more would have been a knee-jek response and without EWT largely meaningless.

Lots of profit taking already this morning by the weak handed.

Morning all.

Am I now glad that I had the confidence to ignore the cross rampers and put ALL my eggs in the (Helium) One basket.... 😁😉

He has certainly been consistent but not always "correct"... :0)

I have no reason to doubt his claims to owning a Bentley and having a portfolio of 50 shares - and frankly I could not care less. Conversely, I KNOW Rojo not to be "consistently correct" when it comes to Aminex....