The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
I meant
"Middle eastern Islamic societies favour old methods to innovation"
Nowt to do wi' Brexit but I think the west's hobby of bombing middle eastern countries back to the stone age has something to do with your prejudice about Islamic countries being backward. Check out Dubai... its a bit more hi tech than Nuneaton or London.
Will leave with it. Have a good weekend.
Alan
"Middle eastern Islamic societies favour old methods to innovation"
Nowt to wi' Brexit byt I think the west's hobby of bombing midfle eastern countries back to the stone age has something to do with your prejudice about Islamic countries being backward. Check out Dubai... its a bit more hi tech than Nuneaton or London.
"whilst your on the subject of low paying jobs.
How about mentioning the effect immigration has on driving down wages".
Indeed... how about mentioning something for which there is no evidence for whatsoever. In case you are unaware there is a huge shortfall in most sectors. This Brexiteer argument is no longer in use by anyone who has a clue even on the Brexit side. Yaxley Lennon and pals not included in that.
You have caught me out a bit .. I had no idea anyone was so clueless.
And what bearing do your prejudices about islam have to do with Brexit which is likely to increase immigration from non EU countries. EU countries being predominantly christian.
The Express is not helping you.
Alan... So given there is a trend to low pay gig jobs, you favour accelerating and exaggerating it by pushing better paid jobs and more beneficial industries out of the country and alienating countries we presently have beneficial trading arrangements with? I think.
Strange logic Alan... a bad things happening so it doesn't matter if we make it worse?
I think the error is moron your side.
The Far End.... it may well be... . sadly the 900 jobs, the 30,000 visitors and the firms and staff who accommodate them , the tax they all pay as well as our ability to sustain our market leadership in pharmaceuticals will go with them. How long before the pharmaceutical companies themselves go with them too.
Just one of the many tangible benefits if Brexit which all Brexiteers clearly understood 3 years ago.
Well done and congratulations, we can go back to selling Ackroyd's Old English medicinal peppermints and our young people can look forward to nice gig delivery jobs.
A terrible and avoidable outcome. Brexit is not the only issue In a difficult global market, but which government or parth can afford to make matters worse? Spiralling costs of production due to Brexit's effect on exchange rates is one thing, but which foreign company can afford to buy British steel when they don't know what it will cost. The government have lamely said they can't help when its a case they don't want to. As Boris says "f### business'.
Its a shame to see the European Medical Agency opening in the Netherlands now. 900 jobs lost to London, 30,000 visitors a year, plus all the influence that gave us in our critical and successful pharmaceutical industry. How long will that stay? F$%# business, jobs and the economy, Trump will bail us out so long as we support his disastrous foreign policy.
LTI
800 is a bigger number than 35. It is not a matter of personal preference.
Interest on the National debt is roughly speakjng 5% of government income (more normally called revenue) and government expenditure. It is therefore a far less significant than expenditure when determining deficit or surplus. It is always paid.
No one calls the uk national deficit or surplus the uk national income apart from you. Have you found an example of that yet?
Keep looking and feel free to continue trying to explain how "income" = "net income" when net income is "income" minus "expenditure" as you have stated.
Thanks for your time
.I see .. in line with your earlier thinking ..
So can you find some examples of where the National deficit is referred to as the "National income" or "income" other than in your posts. Or indeed a National surplus is referred to as the National income or just plain income.... in the way you were? Outside your posts?
I like to get down to your level and mirror your behaviours sometimes. As a result we have made progress now. I now see that income = income after expediture, in other words deficit in your mind..... sometimes.
So income = net income which is "in other words "the deficit"" as you yourself said.
It's no problem. If you like to use the word income to mean deficit it is fine so long as we know. What word do you use to mean income before you take off expenditure then?
What made me think that?
You saying it made me think that. As you said..
"Income was referring to net after expenditures. In other words the deficit"
Ie income meant deficit ..... in your own words.
Ltidiot
"No it is the interest payments on the debt inherited, which far exceeded income"
So you want us to pretend that the word income actually means deficit. Why not. A very small redefinition by your standards. Only mildly idiotic.
Indeed not Boomerbower. My post corrected your nonsense. The upvotes came as usual from ghe usual lurkers here .. a group of people as dozy as yourself who would upvote a suggestion to lick dogs%%% off the floor if they thought it implied Brexit was a good idea.
But forgetting that .. what did you mean when you talked about GDP debt of 11% ?
LTI
"No it is the interest payments on the debt inherited, which far exceeded income that has pushed up debt further"
How's that LTI? Uk revenue is around £800 billion a year, actual cost of servicing national debt allowing for the percentage the government pays to itself is around £35 billion.
National debt has risen about 3 times the net interest payments in round figures since the Tories came to power.
I wouldn't be thanking Boomerbower for explaining anything. He is obviously as clueless on the subject of national debt as he is on every other subject he spouts on. We can tell that by his reference to "GDP debt" the economic equivalent of a mechanic telling you the petrol wheel on a car is broken. Wtf is gdp debt?
And then the percentage of 11% wt actual f is that meant to be??
Uk debt to GDP ratio is about 87.4% just now .. it was about 50% when the Tories took over.