Member Info for Crocqman

They would have been in a closed period up until the release of the interims.

If he is in the possession of price sensitive information, there may be restrictions around being able to trade, but that is not the same thing as being in a closed period.

A closed period is specifically the 30 days prior to release of the FY results and HY results. A closed period does not exist outside of these 2 annual 30-day events.

Either he does not know the rules or is incorrectly referring to being restricted from trading due to effectively being an insider as being in a closed period.

I was expecting a move to the long stop date. It generally seems to happen with arrangements like this

News release as there is something to announce, not because a handful of individuals demand it.

A good update. Maybe it will put a few rumours to bed, but with no mention of the elusive 7b, that we have been informed does not exist, and with no direct rebuttal, I am sure this will rumble on.

Great post from NCJR on the general situation and investing and current/future requirements.

Hopefully, a small rise today with confirmation all is on schedule.

gla

Yes, GB Energy will be a different pathway, but still interesting in how they expect it to work,

They may be able to invest in, and generate more green energy which is not a bad thing, but I don't see how they can say it will reduce prices or save customers some £300 per year. This is what the public will be looking for out of this and the money they intend to use to set this up is considerable. I only mentioned it alongside the proposed NWF as a long-term project, which Governments do not seem to follow through on, and both appear great ideas on paper. Putting these plans into action without vastly watering down the proposal will be key, along with not getting bogged down in the usual red tape, cost-cutting, etc we always encounter with any genuinely good or beneficial proposal in the UK

This and the proposed GB Energy are good policy proposals. Long term thinking rather than the usual short term, let's get re-elected ideas we normally see from the ruling parties with long term projects kicked into the long grass for someone else to deal with.

Let's see delivery, but this is in an area of low wages and low job availability outside of tourism/hospitality, so should be a project to get support, if not funding.

There was Government support before the leadership change, so no reason why that should not continue.

It will be interesting to see if, when fund raising is required what extent of investment any government backed scheme may make, and on what terms

Already a third of yesterday's low but decent volume in a similar number of trades as over the entire day.

Bodes well

Tbh, there is not really anything in this RNS that warrants it's release.

They have already informed us of the proposed finance arrangements and what they are looking for, and what they plan to do with the money although welcome is worthless without the funding being confirmed.

Not complaining, it is the kind of message that the market will lap up. At least they are updating shareholders. Maybe a sign they have turned a corner on the Comms front, or it is the influence of the new guy.

Hopefully not a distraction from the other news due and from further appointments.

Kinda explains the rise yesterday on relatively low volume. Let's see how the market reacts

gla

Well, it did hold into close. Nice.

Let's see what tomorrow brings

As with the previous rise, I expect it to fall back before close with some profit taking towards the end of day.

I suggested a hold above 6 would be good last week, but it fell back to 5.85. Close, but it still fell back a way from the highs of the day.

Any decent recent on no news is good clearly, but we hit 7.5 only 5 weeks ago, so need to hold onto gains and continue to progress just to get back there.

Volume today is not much higher than average compared with Thursday last week, but more buys than sells if the figures are to be believed.

Let's hope the talk is being backed up with action/delivery as we know news is due

gla

What have we been kept in the dark about?

I don't understand other than you suggesting someone was dumping when they were actually accumulating?

For me, TGR undoubtably was on a strong growth trajectory with all the work done to upgrade infrastructure, initial production, etc to get to the point it was circa this time last year.

That has certainly stalled though, but the possibility is still there, imo, to get back onto that but first we need to see the accounts signed, off, news on debt repayment and funding. If these can be handled in a timely manner then there will be the chance to push on, but at the moment these uncertainties, along with the VAT refund are a bit of a millstone around the neck.

If good news arrives on these fronts, then the current uncertainty will reduce and investment risk be be lower which may entice more investors on board.

We need a change in sentiment, and it is down to Shishir and team to deliver and show he has taken on board lessons from this past year and can drive the company forward

Everyone has different reasons for buying/selling/holding.

Different strategies, risk requirements, time horizons, etc.

Larger investors may also have holding requirements/restrictions that PI's do not have so may be forced to add/reduce in order to remain compliant with any investment restrictions on their account.

A £4k size trade is immaterial.

Unless there is a clear trading pattern, not really worth worrying too much about individual trades, imo.

Ilovesushi on another board bragging about his trade here today and bragging about his profits made elsewhere from trading.

Non-stop ramping here this am to get his trade away. So transparent. Fair play to him for taking profits, but a scummy way to do it.

I wasn't planning on it, but just added some more.

I expect any future funding to be at a higher price than where we are now, but not expecting any significant movement in the short term, just confirmation that all is going to plan from operational updates (not responding to rumours).

I do still feel that the election could have an impact, as clarification/assurances would be needed for any ongoing government support and for permissions/planning, etc but there does not seem to be any particular reason why any new government would have a drastic change in policy towards a project like this.

My opinion. My choice to invest. This is now my 2nd largest position. When it comes to funding I may add more depending on where this is at, terms of any deal and how my other positions are looking at the time.

gla

Went out before the open and just back to see the rise and the chat exploding here.

Not getting carried away, still need delivery on financing and still need to get the accounts and existing debt requirements sorted as well as the VAT refund. Still a big month ahead

Plenty of promise. Will the rise hold or will some of the sudden arrivals here be taking their profits after their ramping?

Broken our highest daily volume for this year already, possibly the highest ever volume day here.

A close above 6 would be a good day

gla

It was the same person who said we will finally see the end of 4's (up on RNS) who also said we were going into the 3's when he would buy more.

And both posts on the same day!

The rationality of investors and these boards :-)

Not saying we should forget what has gone on in the past, but perhaps it's time to judge the company on results/delivery post- requisition GM.

This is a positive step, so why knock it for the sake of it? Let's wait and see and then judge based on time to deliver, terms,etc

Looks like Shishir means business on the financial front.

Let's see what they come up with with regard to terms, dilution, etc and how long to close out any arrangement.

It's a start

Agree, the price of lithium is not particularly important until such time we know the answer regarding the CEOL announcements (expected on or around Monday) and then the full process to proceed.

The price will only become important when this is all known and it comes to arranging financing (potentially in relation to terms) and when negotiating any advance off-take agreements, imo.

Given we have been steered towards Monday for an announcement, let's hope it does not turn into the more vague 'on or around' timeline as this will increase the levels of doubt/uncertainty already being seen here.

For me, this news will still determine news on any financing, and I still lean towards Q4 for this given what is known at this point in time, unless there is an SP rise that creates a better opportunity to strike before then

Talk about nonstop and deliberate negativity.

Why do you spend so much time here trying to find negative things to post at every opportunity?

4 weeks to complete the accounts and all companies post at the end of the timeframe in order to provide the most recent updates to ongoing operations.

By all means post in 4 weeks if they are late and I'll get on board, but this is just agenda driven knocking from someone who picked the losing team.

Same with the funding/cash requirements