RE: Shareholder legal avenues3 Jul 2025 17:15
I sadly have a great deal of experience in trying to take a director to court for corruption. As I said, with 4D Pharma, the same happened asxhere, but the CEO was an ex-lawyer, held funds in overseas accounts, made sure anything he said on You Tube was deleted( he even deleted RNS’s! We had to re-source them) and gave different information to the Nasdaq from the LSE. It was a set-up in order to shaft shareholders as the” product” did not actually exist and it was true snake oil sales. The difficulty is the UK courts. In the Us, the SEC is sh**-hot. He would have been jailed. So he gave the US different info withheld from us here. That’s what allowed the shorters to destroy the company. HP were magnificent. They provided a list of questions to each shareholder. One guy lost £600k and his marriage. Many many families lost life savings including mine. Members of Sharesoc lost loads! One corporate lawyer lost £750k. But the courts here are feeble, let’s be clear on that. The solicitors know that judges are corrupt at times and mostly don’t give a damn. You must have a 51%+ chance of success after analysis get a solicitor firm to take it on. No win no fee is the only way. P/i’s don’t have the money. Damon Parker is a true diamond and his team parted with £50k to analyse. The team were not as passionate for justice as him I discovered, but they did what they chose to . The answer lies in RNS’s. The lawyer CEO had hidden any evidence. RNS’s were not incriminating, and interviews were not seen as evidence , very curiously to me. In order to take PB to court, one must rely on RNS’s.
1) . Delay is spurious..they could wriggle out of that.
2) Clearly stating no link between loan and fundraise in an RNS is seriously incriminating. Please post the wording here!! An interview may also be seen as evidence. RNS’s are preferred though.
3) The contingency of the loan on the raise not released until 30th June is not a normal delay. This is incriminating , as shareholders were “intentionally” kept in the dark.
Placees names were withheld which may not be incriminating.
From experience I can say that we need a private group to share RNS info, as these boards are infiltrated. Our Telegram group had paid “ guests” who reported back to the company. It was all just disgusting and I lost £220k and my family’s security. Many lives were shattered.
We NEED quotes from RNS’s stating no contingency of the loan upon the fundraise. Avoid opinions as solicitors and judges only want hard proof.
Please source the quotes from the RNS’s and list them as you have done, but verbatim.
In my opinion this is a far stronger case if you can do that . AIM regulations are breached and shareholders have been very clearly deceived. Verbatim extracts are crucial. I cannot give my email here. Not allowed.
But there are other ways of communication..Telegram etc.
If there is another fundraise, we will likely never ever see this share abov