Member Info for Cranleigh

Hadn’t spotted that, Craigy. Weird - I have no idea why buys + sells don’t equal total volume!

Better volume - but still pretty darn low at under 0.5m shares (or, at current prices, half a hovel's worth)

I think they are all showing as negative trades, so presumably correcting previous errors for some reason.

The buy/sell indicator is of course nonsense for these entries, as the actual trade price back in April/May is being compared to the mid-price today at the time when the error (as I see it) was corrected.

"Not much stock available at current price".

That's how I see it, Toblerone - I had to pay above ask to get my top-up yesterday.

If MMs earn money through volume, I think they need to take the price up to generate some.

All this time input for an "investment" of ?$12K....the other one's got bells on

Have to agree, Matt.

The Chuckles clutter up this board with "helpful" and "fellow investor" posts that they probably know LSE Admin would not remove as they do not often patently breach the LSE rules, so far as I can tell/remember. The trolls on ADVFN are if anything worse than the Chuckles. I don't think if any of these fools posted on Telegram they would last long.

To any investor wondering if the Chuckles might be actual supporters of ZOE, why do they spend so much time doing "research" (AKA mainly pestering ZOE's customers) and posting, when the "less slow" twin claims to have invested a mighty £15K or so? Say ten times that supported by documentary evidence, maybe I'd think again.

Green is the colour.

Hardly a troll, more a troll-buster it would seem!

Oh lore, I’ve upset a sheep of colour! Sorry, 15.

I suspect benoogs may have ben silently observing for plenty enough time to spot the two wolves dolled up as sheep

Thanks Toblerone, I stand corrected!
Key phrase "pro Zoe".

I think it is by invitation, Billy.

I wouldn't hold your breath....

Look to me like worked buys reported late

That’s an initiative others might follow?

"your all to clever for me". Don't tell me these bashers can't write in English?

Well I don't think it can be Hopeless Dave or Craigy. So I'm really stumped. They must be awfully good at it.

What, ALL of his short?

Possibly the only "shareholder" expecting no news until 26 July.....

Hopeful, you've missed a gap that needs filling.
Clues: TWat, dentistry

I agree with Warno01; but with the margins anticipated, our cashflow should be very strong and sufficient to fuel very rapid organic growth...so dividends could IMHO reasonably be expected in say 3-4 years' time when that rate of growth may start to slow. And they won't be at the rate of mere happypennies!

I think Vascular has a point, but bear in mind that these stands are intended for the checkout, where every square inch is precious. And ours can return way more $ profit per square inch at the checkout than eg sweets/candy, pens, badges, lighters or whatever.

Away from it, there is certainly a case for much bigger-capacity units.