Member Info for ColdFishPie

Who is that directed at belhus because i cant see any posts that would prompt you too write it?

I also noticed that srra are presenting at jeffries rather than just holding 1-1's....thats interesting!

Got to agree with that bob...its starting to look like we are just lemons hanging from a tree. Also, i think it was krone mentioned the other day about srra having mon in their portfolio now and any impact on us....well, the good news is that recruitment seems to be going well which would suggest that the news is pretty good but they are reviewing when the parp combo will start because of their increased workload and costs. Dont get ne wrong...the combo was an extra brought in by srra but it does seem that there might be some effect. Overall though, i am happy that the recruitment is going well and they seem to be on track from the last update.

Who knows searle but i would not have thought much of a drop...if you could get .75 or just below, i would grab it but mm's like to play and they dont mind getting dirty:)

An rns just came out for iteos theraputics at 1pm, says they are going to do some presentations. Anyway, their cancer theraputics is no relation to what we do but i was interested to see that they were founded out of a uni and they raised 75m dollars in their first funding round. Ffs...we could not even sell sar for that kind of money and we are 15 years down the line and hawking around giving 20% discounts for 800k. The uk sure is a small minded place and those who have the money just grab grab grab! Rant over!

I should have said...consider very seperate. They do seem to be giving mon the focus but i dont think they will give chk any less commitment because of that...its just that mom is further on and it was glovers baby at one point. I also have wondered if they intentionally started to downplay chk a bit in the last update...they have to be careful with over confidence re before. Anyway, re my last point on bod...im surprised they are not going to Jeffries conference next week..opportunity for one to one's.

Hi krone, not sure what you mean, momelotenib is totally seperate from chk1 and srra need chk1 to be a success. I know what you mean re relationship but we dont really have one with srra as far as we know. If you are referring to the jaks there are using and our tyk2, while the might be some overlapping chemistry, i would very seperate targets etc..then again, im hardly the expert you asked for...soz! Fecking boring this share...get off you ass bod:)

I see john caroll says 'apparently gsk' which might be a reference too...for all their bluster with hal barron, they are not showing much yet! Im not excited either but im always hopeful something will spring out of the blue. Song song blue...everybody knows one:)

Its great to hear all these millions being talked about but 28p is a 35 bagger from here! Mind you...stranger things have happened. Just do it SAR!

Good point thoth but i read somewhere it can cost upwards of 250k so there would have to be a viable reason other than liquidity...and i would agree with the general feeling, i have never really seen it working well but thats more likely to do with the companies who i have seen do it and then they continue to place like confetti. So, if done...it would have to be at the right time and for the right reason really...and im sort of hoping we wont get that far. I did not know about the dollar on nasdaq...best that sierra release some fantastic news soon then! Bloody unfair the market is sometimes and it seems they have been trounced for slightly changing direction...imo.

Rmm....i think you are dreaming on 2 fronts. Its highly unlikely that sar would consolidate, 3b is not massive for an aim share and consolidation costs money...what cash sar have will be spent operationally. We can guess when news will come but in all probabity it will be out of the bods hands so we will just have to wait and see. Anything could happen at anytime but very hopeful for the positive so come on sar....feed us:)

I think its a positive...the way things have gone for afc in the last few months and their silence, i must admit i was fearing that this contract might be down the swanney. Looks like it will be going ahead ok....grateful for small mercys and all that.

Thats a horrific outlook....simply wall street make it sound very so so though:) Given that the business has had its problems and performed so badly over the last 4 years and im not saying that its all the current ceo's fault, it does not make good reading. An interesting point is that AFC seem to be going into hiding also and theres no doubt about it...who, what, where....somebody has been dumping big time. So what is it.....has a major shareholder got sick of it and AFC know they are in a lot of trouble, something strange is going on and the company have went incognito so their next update could be interesting.

Stoney, Searle gave a good explanation to that 53k...it wws a transfer by an existing holder between 2 accounts so although shown as a sell here...it was neither a buy or sell and was to do with the holder have an account with the placing agent which we learn was svs. I tell you something and i have to say that hal barron has only been in the position 7 months or so but hes hardly making a flying start. Ofcourse, this is a lot of media hype and 7 months is no time but if you are playing catch up...you would have thought that he knew before who/what he wanted to go for and more would have come out of it by now. Ofcourse, im not specifically referring to us, we might not even be in their/his consideration but its surprising that they have not moved quicker to bulk up and i wonder if there is some opposition within. Im going to keep my eye on how that pans out..in fairness, i have not been a big fan of azn in recent years but it looks like their getting quite lively.

So this is a notifiable holder who had an account with the 3rd party licensed broker... And the notifiable holder transferred the shares from his account with the 3rd party broker into his account with another broker...is that correct? Assumming then that the above is correct, you cant report a sell into the market without then reporting a buy even if its a transfer....thats misleading the market? I cant see how that can be justified...

Hi 3card, did not realise you are in bmr although i have been out a few years. Got out by the skin of my teeth but lost a fair bit of money there... The reason i bring it up is that i love telling the story about the former ceo, the one before borelli, i cant remember his name. Anyway.....over a few years he stole £20m out of the company and then claimed amnesia to where the money went...and he got off with it too because an african docter stated that he had mental problems...i think when borelli came in he agreed with the family a £1m settlement because they also did not know where the money went! 20m is a lot of cash to disappear...would fill a few suitcases. That was one of the worst i seen on aim...where you in then 3card, i think they still have a few issues now....are they suspended?

Jt...who is too say that they did not dump at a higher price. I welcome anybody to look at the last 4-5 months trades and nearly all buys have been covered with a similar sell volumes very quickly......i think we have all commented on this at some point. Now, we can hope that the placing shares have been forward sold but that might be stretching things and if they have...why did we only get .65, that must have been quite a tasty fee for the agent given that a lot would have been sold well into the 80's. I said friday before the 380 was seen...that was not normal trading for a share that had just placed at a 20% discount to sp and although there might be some pi buys there, i would be reluctant to think it was much, so was the forward selling being bought back on friday...im still not happy if it was because that leaves a number of dodgy questions unanswered. One saving grace would be that we see a large director deal rns on mon/tue....that would be nice if it was parker using his own cash and for the crack...i would stomach that, close my eyes and move on:) Aim is a wonderful world but i always hoped and thought that SAR would steer clear of this and as i said on friday, im really surprised that they could not get the money in a better way.....one that would have been more cost effective and safer for PI's. Wonders will never cease but dodgy dealing normally results in big trouble for shareholders as we see all to often. So come on sar, if it was a one off...clean it up, give us some decent news and lets get things moving!

Seems to be a lot of mates here recently...very generous these mates:)

Yes and i think we are dreaming if we think todays buying are people topping up or been waiting on the sidelines for the placing to be announced...it dont work that way.

Predictive text on this is rubbish...i meant thoth of-course. Good job honda dave is not around just now...i would have done myself in listening to his thoughts today:)