RE: Significance of this statement1 Oct 2021 12:41
On the one hand Sang, you're telling people to top up around 62p. On the other, you're saying it'll tank to sub 40p. On the one hand I'm filtered, on the other hand I've convinced you to sell up. Which is it?!
Far from whining, I'd say I'm asking legitimate questions of 4D's management, on which I'm always open to a counter view - including yours. You were right about Oliveira selling up.
At least my view is consistent though, and I'm not trying to sucker investors in or out.
I'm hoping 50-55p will be a floor based on a guesstimate of Oliveira's selling price, it could be lower. That's a positive, at least we're nearing a floor, I think. I'm prepared to top up then, if it drops there.
I'm hoping all that newsflow promised for H2, now lands in Q4. That's a positive. I do think most, though not all, of it will land & 4D must be on to something.
I believe there is a strong future in the microbiome, and I don't see how 4D could have had the results they've had on oncology so far, by chance. That's a positive.
But it's entirely fair to question, when the SP is imploding, why the Board aren't doing more to reassure the market.
And I am slightly concerned that by the time they release anything of significance, the whole stock market may be tanking & it'll have minimum impact short to medium term.
And with the SP languishing as it is, if the science is that strong, I'm concerned we'll be bought out on the cheap. I didn't invest in a risky share to sell out for £1. I've invested - for the long term - to make many multiples of that.