Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
SCB, you don’t know for sure but you remember something very specific?!
If someone genuinely made fun of mental illness, I agree, that would not be on. But did someone really, truly do that? Honestly? This has been a LOVELY board so I would be surprised. Then you turned up and, wow, did everything change. You jumped in, both feet first, flaming people.
We’ve even had people from the BOO board come over here, saying you’re doing here what you did there. That suggests you get a kick out of what you’re doing, and that your comments are not about the share, they’re about attention and provoking a response.
@FreddieHayek hit the nail on the head - you are repetitive. For example; the other day you posted the same, long comment three times in something like a little over 12 hours.
A different thread on here just got wiped! Shortly after SBC posted.
@EdwardSeaton,
I agree that what SBC wants is attention. He is like a virgin on a one week holiday with you, fresh out of college, teasing you because you only got laid twice.
Have you noticed how he keeps getting one vote up? I suspect he has a second account.
I tried to follow your previous advice on how to filter people but couldn’t see how to despite your instructions. I don’t know if it’s because I’m on an iPhone. Can you tell me how to do it? There’s no “filter” option that I can see.
Thanks.
@bankrak:
You can explain it to him but you can’t understand it for him.
SCB even copy & pastes his own comments. His comment at 0747 is what he posted at 1933 and 1458 yesterday.
I wouldn’t try to persuade SCB that he’s wrong - he’s clearly dim and I suspect that what he craves is attention.
Well done, @crawshaw, for finding the source.
As if his verbal diarrhoea isn’t enough, he’s actually repeating himself now (the same post as at 1458). So I’ll repeat mine, updated:
“@southcoastbather - did your parents not pay you any attention? 32 posts already today and the day is not yet over.”
“For these reasons, I’m not going to invest at the moment”
…should read:
“For these reasons and because I haven’t got a clue, I’m not going to invest at the moment.”
@southcoastbather - that’s an amusing question considering that this morning you were completely unaware that dividends had been paid or how much they were.
I charge for my advice. As you’ve only got £1.20 left to invest after losing everything on BOO, I’ll pass on your question.
@southcoastbather - did your parents not pay you any attention? 28 posts already today and the day is not yet over.
@southcoastbather said:
“Where's the bottom?
I've got 120p...”
In total to invest?
Turds object to being compared to SCB.
@southcoastbather
LOL. Check out how much it rose subsequently. When did I sell, and at what price? You claim to know so, go on, tell me.
Would you like me to consider paying for therapy for you? God knows I can afford it out of this share alone. You’ve lost a fortune and it hurts, I understand. You’re trying to pull people down to make yourself feel better - I don’t understand. It’s not healthy. Worse, it isn’t working and all you’re doing is showing yourself up (which would explain why you lost so much money). Would you like therapy?
Please keep it up, @southcoastbather. Your comments are amusing - we are all laughing at you.
@southcoastbather
You missed the party. You were too busy on BOO, burning your money. Losing all that money must have really hurt.
Oh well, never mind.
@southcoastbather - Thank you for answering my question. Your answer is:
1. You have no actual analysis.
2. You have no idea what the 4 red flags are.
3. Analysis for you means a 2-second look at the SP graph.
“3” was evident the moment that you turned up on here because you referred to the SP graph and knew nothing about the company. But I’ve given you time to nail your colours to the mast since then and you haven’t deviated from one thumb up your bum and the other pointing at the SP graph.
In summary, you’re simple and haven’t got a clue. It means that:
1. If any prediction by you turns out to be correct (inevitable for even a village idiot), it will be coincidence.
2. My first post to you (@southcoastbather will be carried out to sea by a financial rip tide) is more accurate than I realised - anyone whose financial analysis consists of a glance at the SP will drown.
P.S. You sound awfully like another poster on a different board.
@southcoastbather - and what is your analysis of those 4 red flags?
Dark_Knight2020, don’t worry - southcoastbather is displaying financial ignorance. He’ll soon be swept out to sea by a financial rip tide. We can all wave goodbye and wish him well as he fades from view.
She stopped singing a while ago, is in the ground and acting as a fertiliser.
This is like people who’ve fallen for a 419 scam getting excited because someone has phoned them saying he can help them get their money back. All it requires is payment up front…
Would you buy these shares for 1p/share?
There lies your answer.
Ask poorinvester (LSE’s resident Walter Mitty) to fund any legal action - he’s loaded. We know because he told us - he made a small fortune on this share, even though the SP did the precise opposite of what he predicted. It’s a gift, I tell you!
He has the advantage that he can become a legal expert just by closing his eyes, tapping his heels together three times and saying “I’m a legal expert”.
(In case you missed it, he previously said “Wolf, I have been in business a long time And I explained to you a long time ago, I’m an expert in maths….” https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=CINE&share=Cineworld&thread=5B33D0CF-864B-4D78-84FA-F9F2198D409A&page=4).