Member Info for cindercone

One of the best articles I've ever read on BMN. Simplifies the message, the growth strategy and earnings very succinctly.

If it came out the mouth of Mr Cooperman, BMN might have been up 50% today. The frustrating thing for me is that the message is being broadcast but not received. If it was, we wouldn't be stuck below a manipulated ceiling of 25p.

13% drop because Statoil have changed the rig date by 4 weeks. Ludicrous, but very fortunate for those who never thought they'd see £1.80 again.

Ah, my knowledge doesn't stretch back that far. Look forward to the day they're all gone so we can simplify SP movements.

Don't forget, Atlas still has 11 million warrants to offload - almost treble what Wogen had.

No worries Tyfoon. I agree, it's all very tiring.

@Tyfoon

Haven't filtered anyone, you've got the wrong end of the stick.

Filtered for being bullish on BMN - that's a new one. A lot of bullying on this board IMO. Still, nothing changes the fundamentals of this gem of a company.

@Faramog

Not sure how you managed to respond seeing as I am on your filtered list. Your clairvoyancy is impressive, I hope it extends to being correct about BMN's SP.

@alfacomp

Oh right, so those one or two predicting a £10 SP a few weeks ago felt that was achievable on Vametco profits alone? Very impressive.

Not sure he was grateful, but he was sincere - unlike you. Anyway, I mostly happen to enjoy your posts, so no biggie. You keep doing what you do and I will likewise. Couldn't give a rat's arse if I'm disliked, ignored or ridiculed, but I don't like being censored and I'm sure you're the same.

@Daisydog.

I fully agree that Vametco is completely undervalued and there remains massive upside on that alone. I was just pointing out that certain posters were forward projecting the value of VRFBs onto the business and there was little difference between that point of view and those who are supposedly being 'unrealistically negative'.

Sanchez, I believe you're the one with the criteria. I'm suggesting there should be no criteria, and if posts are not to your or my liking, we should simply ignore them.

By the way, I apologised to Ophidian as, whilst I didn't agree with his EW theories, on reflection I felt my critique was OTT. Maybe you missed that, but he most gratefully accepted my apology.

@Sanchez

Unrealistic negatives? Funny, because I've never noticed anyone being castigated for posting 'unrealistic positives'. Besides, his negatives were not unrealistic. Perhaps you can tell me on what basis you can guarantee BMN VRFBs will be successfully trialled, let alone universally adopted?

There's been plenty of contributors coming on here claiming a £10 SP in 4-5 years. I think we all know what would need to happen for that to be realistic, and I'd be delighted if it came to pass, but at this stage in BMN's development it's *******s.

Yes, it's an online forum, and I want to read a variety of opinions. It doesn't need to be policed and nobody needs to be protected from people with suspect or garbage views. I have confidence enough in my investment to form my own opinion.

If I think someone is up to mischief I will ignore them, and if everyone does the same they will very quickly buzz off. What I don't want is a sterilised forum where certain views are discouraged. (A) Because I want to keep my investment grounded in reality (B) It won't make sod all difference to the SP either way.

Well done SOTRR for offering a comprehensive and detailed response for certain shareholders who have doubts. THIS is what gives me my faith in investment, not people who try to shut down the conversation.

Yes, I'm expecting mine to disappear within the next five minutes, backing up my theory.

IMO, criticising people like Razorshultz demonstrates a lack of confidence in your investment. To me, that's more troubling than anything he has to say, of which I don't find anything remotely controversial. He's right, there is no evidence that VRFBs will take off, and sky-high vanadium prices 'could' certainly be an impediment to that.

Rather than being concerned about the likes of him, I'd be more mindful of certain holders who are clearly trying to manipulate the SP. Don't ask me who they are, I wouldn't have a clue - but I wouldn't be surprised if there's isn't a few hypocrites on here saying one thing and doing the complete opposite to make a few extra grand.

Erongo-time.

3.5% drop for a 500k sell seems quite excessive, especially considering buys outweigh reported sells generally. Hopefully, Wogen dumped the last 1.5m - to be reported COP.

If Wogen are splitting up the trades in compliance with BMN to avert 'crashing' the share, it's unlikely they would drop a 500k sell and follow it up with loads of other smaller sells. What's the rush? They will soon clear their stack with one 500k sell each day.

No, something else is going on here. I'd wager some short sellers are riding on the back of Wogen's warrants in order to scaremonger. If so, it's amateur hour - BMN has never been successfully shorted.

Hopefully, when Wogen is done and dusted, we'll get an Erongo-style re-rate.

Pulling out of this share on Monday. No shareholder communication whatsoever, so why would they expect people to invest? Very amateur IMO.