Theory15 Oct 2018 14:32
Let me posit a theory, which could be twaddle or otherwise. AIM is a gamblers paradise where people look for multibaggers. To those types of investors, 27p looks far less attractive than 8p, which is why the SP went berserk after the Erongo sell-off yet, laughably, has retracted after Sojitz news.
For me, PIs have made a substantial difference to the SP but won't continue to now we're at 27p. Yes, LTHs are underwriting the share to some extent, but now all we have are the usual AIM bandwagon jumpers that bounce in and out and are manipulated by the markets.
BMN needs a broker that fully understand the fundamentals of what's going on here. One that's genuinely excited about BMN's vision and capacity for growth, and reports to IIs who will buy the shares in their millions.
We can all say that AIM plays games and undervalues companies, but some are overvalued, so why not BMN? With or without Meyer, SP Angel clearly has no market leverage and BMN needs a broker with market leverage. Even if Meyer wasn't a clown, but was bullish and priced BMN at £1.50, who would take any notice? Probably no-one.
LSE rules dictate BMN has to have a broker, so they picked a two-bob one. You pay peanuts you get monkeys. And that's what we're getting. Of course, news will drop to shift the SP, but it will never reach true value or be overvalued until BMN gets a serious broker or market exposure to IIs.