Member Info for Chaebol

Once EMI and MiCA is confirmed failure/s

Youll get the bottom........

Myself and SuperMouse were the only 2 posters that doubted the original semnet update in December, most of you then said its complete, Aim told me the bet was won and he needed to collect 5k off me lol

Now its brilliant that its 4.2 million! again I dont beleive that either, these lot are playing some horse and pony show! and if this is really real, zheng and choo could have got off with this much easier and looks like they prepared to play the long game and if so can win just like GST can win. Arbitration lawsiuits for another 12-18 months keeps instis and real buyers away.

Makes this 1.8 million deal that was a mediated agreeement was a load of bs to pump the sp.

Said it was bs at the time, got mocked for that as well, here we are again with Chaebol correct ! lol

FCA move fast lol

What makes you think the defendants had the money.

They made 5 million from the sale of semnet roughly, but if you think they dont have funds for 1.8 million how they gonna find 4.2?

You should have sold a long time ago Ian !@this is in a doom loop!

You suggested it many times !

Billy boy coming up with desperate tones!

They told they had agreed, then 2 months later its now 4.2 million and ex mangaer has been served.

This is woeful !

Mervyn Zhen was seeling Nvidia servers at Singapore expo November last year.

MAde me wonder why semnet werent there...these lot a re playing some mad game and shareholders are paying for this crazy ineptness.

This could take 2 years to sort out now, more arbi limbo! how soon to 0.2p

No they said expected

This is actually moving quicker.

hahahahaha

Leaky leaky neobankers.

BFD told me lol

big red big give ups lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

You were all warned with these fools!

They told the market they had virtually agreed, these lot are full of sheet.

Lol BOD gave figures in Dec 18th update. Now its changed lol jokers!

Now its really severely delayed!

FCA Connect <connect@fca.org.uk>

9:57 PM (8 hours ago)

to me

If you are contacting us on behalf of a firm or trading venue, please see the last section of this email.

If you are an individual

Thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to our attention, we appreciate your assistance. If you believe that you have been impacted by market abuse, we are sorry to hear this.

Confidentiality

If you wish to report your concerns confidentially to our whistleblowing team, you can email whistle@fca.org.uk or call 020 7066 9200. Find out more about whistleblowing.

What will happen next

Market abuse is unacceptable conduct which harms financial markets. Tackling market abuse is therefore a high priority for the FCA. We review all reports we receive about alleged market abuse to determine whether it is appropriate for us to investigate further.

More information about the FCA’s approach to tackling market abuse is available here. Please also see our list of final notices and related press releases for detail on action we have taken.

Updates in relation to the information you have provided

It is unlikely that we will be able to provide you with feedback on or updates in relation to individual cases of market abuse. This is because of the sensitive nature of our work and the strict confidentiality requirements we must abide by.

Providing further information

If you have not done so already, and only if the information is readily available to you (you should not attempt to obtain information you do not have which is not publicly available on our behalf), you may wish to send the following:

- The name of the financial instrument which you believe has been used in or impacted by market abuse.

- The identity of any people or companies involved in the behaviour.

- Specific dates and times of any transactions which you believe amount to market abuse.

- An explanation of your reasons for believing that market abuse has been committed.

If you become aware of further information that you think will assist our enquiries, please also send this information to the Market Abuse Inbox. We will review any additional information alongside your original email. For ease of reference, please refer to, or attach, your previous emails in any further correspondence.

If you are a firm or trading venue

If your email relates to a Suspicious Transaction and Order Report (STOR), the FCA cannot accept a STOR submission via this inbox. Please submit STORs using the on-line STOR form, accessed via the Connect portal.

If your email relates to a Market Observation, please submit this using the on-line Market Observation form, accessed via the Connect portal.

Please ensure you are set up as a Connect user. You can do this by registering directly from the Connect Homepage or via your firm’s Principal User (if available).

For further assistance please see the FCA’s guide to

2/2

I am concerned that this may constitute a breach of Article 17(1) of the UK Market Abuse Regulation, which requires an issuer to inform the public as soon as possible of inside information that directly concerns it. If the Company is seeking to delay disclosure under Article 17(4), the prolonged period of silence (now exceeding five weeks beyond the original expectation) raises questions as to whether the statutory conditions for such delay continue to be met.

I respectfully request that the FCA investigate whether GSTechnologies Limited has complied with its disclosure obligations under UK MAR in relation to this matter. The shares were suspended in August through previous regulatory failures and I am afraid the BOD is utilising similar inept skills that led to those initial failures.

Sadly, I hold shares in the Company and would be happy to provide any additional information that may assist your review.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to receiving confirmation of receipt.

Yours faithfully,

Kung Fu Master Yes Please

1/2 Get this over to the FCA lads, get them to act!

Below you can make your complaint about the delayed semnet news.

https://www.fca.org.uk/market-abuse-reporting-form

Financial Conduct Authority

12 Endeavour Square

London

E20 1JN

Dear FCA,

I am writing as a [private investor/shareholder in GSTechnologies Limited] to bring to your attention a potential failure by GSTechnologies Limited (LSE: GST) to comply with its continuing disclosure obligations under the UK Market Abuse Regulation (UK MAR).

In its Interim Results announcement released via Regulatory News Service (RNS) on 18 December 2025, the Company provided the following update on its ongoing arbitration dispute with the sellers of Semnet Pte. Ltd.:

"A mediation hearing was held in early December 2025 and a formal settlement agreement between the Sellers and the Company is expected to be entered into in late December 2025 or early January 2026. It is currently expected by the GST Board that this will see the return to the Company US$800,000 of cash consideration, the 58,844,713 consideration shares issued to the Sellers and a payment in Singapore Dollars equating to approximately US$300,000 to cover the Company's operational costs. Further updates will be announced as appropriate."

(Source: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/GST/interim-results/17379371)

This disclosure indicated that a material settlement – involving the return of significant cash, a substantial block of consideration shares, and reimbursement of operational costs – was anticipated imminently, within days of the announcement.

As of today, 12 February 2026 – more than five weeks after the end of the stated timeframe ("late December 2025 or early January 2026") – the Company has issued no further RNS announcement providing an update on the status of the settlement agreement.

Subsequent RNS releases (e.g., Acquisition of Finferno on 29 December 2025, End of MiCA Transitional Period in Lithuania on 31 December 2025, and Completion of Metapay Acquisition on 22 January 2026) contain no reference to the Semnet matter.

The resolution (or material delay) of this arbitration is clearly price-sensitive inside information that directly concerns the issuer. The anticipated settlement terms are financially significant and would have a notable impact on the Company's balance sheet, issued share capital, and overall financial position. A substantial delay in finalising the agreement – or any change in the expected outcome – would likewise be capable of having a significant effect on the share price.

In the absence of any update, the market continues to trade on the basis of the December 2025 statement, which implied an imminent positive resolution. The Company's own commitment to provide "further updates...as appropriate" has not been honoured in circumstances where an update appears plainly required.

Napolean Hill Think rich grow rich one feet from gold. Love that story

Nero, I'd be wary of any man that owns a pig farm.

But if anyone wishes to try their luck I wish them well.

.76 to 4.23p yeeehawwww posted it ! said it was photoshopped now its 3.3 p when theres clearly a 4.23 p contract note. You have to love the mental gymnastics.

You should accept thats one of best longs here x;)

Again, has anyone else sold at over 4p ? A sincere well done if you have !

'The BOL would not be so stupid to accept a MiCA app on the 31st December and then cancel its biz next day.'

You reading the regs from the same MiCA playbook you read in December?

Hoping from now to July 0.2p to 0.14p.........when the sentiment get smashed these stocks get trounced. I think the market has somehow priced in Semnet but who knows .5 has held on well.

Clarity on failed EMI and MiCA bottoms it out. A potential raise from now to July also gonna see huge downside, BOD must be getting sweaty........ Think its another terrible year here as the plans from 2024/25 have clearly imploded.

Will only be interested in buying when they can show they can deliver, this BOD doesnt do that, worse of all its own shareholders dont beleive them, they're in a big mess and the Lords recent business lies have not helped matters.

Big seller surrendered today 6.5 mill gawn in 5mins. Rage selling will start soon.

Metapay took 10 months and was originally delayed. Polish vasp was a pivot that was not needed with finferro.

and semnet is delayed for whatever reason !