RE: Massive volume18 Dec 2025 12:08
Lol Let's dismantle this delusion point by point,
You refused the smart contract for months – fact. From the moment the £5k bet was on the table, I pushed hard for a proper smart contract (or escrow) to make it enforceable. You dodged, deflected, and hid behind "honour" and "a bet's a bet where I come from" like some anonymous keyboard cowboy who knows full well no one can chase you if you welch. Months of excuses, everyone saw it. Anonymous poster relying on "honour"? That's not principle, that's a calculated get-out clause because you never intended to pay up if you lost.
You keep screeching "I know you don't have 5k" – pure projection. I've been ready the whole time; you're the one who spent months stalling on any real mechanism because deep down you know you'd have to show the money (and you can't or won't).
Nothing is settled yet, and you know it. That magic word "expected" in the RNS is GST's favourite smoke screen – they've been "expecting" EMI licences, profitable growth, and game-changing acquisitions for years. The Semnet unwind is still just words on a page until the cash lands, the 58.8m shares are actually cancelled, and the SGD costs are paid. Until then, it's vaporware, same as always.
So here's the reality: the only person who "fannied out" is the anonymous ramper who talked £5k tough for months, then ran scared from anything binding.
You never had the bottle for a real bet.