Member Info for Cevodniya

Wallar, is this a platform or broker issue.

I'm with Hargreaves Lansdown and I have 19 million.

Sounds to me like Trading212 or AJ Bell?

Theexang that's absolutely brilliant but in fact, simply reinforces my point.

You know 100% the difference between British and American English.

Yet, despite saying yesterday that this thread was infested with individuals trying to irritate posters, you are actually the main instigator.

I can understand the habitual spelling of Defense as a noun, almost like muscle memory for a yankee.

But to change the spelling of a UK registered share?

Why?

That's not muscle memory, that's either pure arrogance or pure ignorance.

Muldoon, the company is called Defence Holdings isn't it?

Why is it not possible for this poster to call the company correctly?

Why would you chanhe the name of a UK registered company on a UK market to American English, why?

What would we do with the AI generated yankee bot.

Here's 3 examples of his latest post

Chancellor's plan to cut other budgets for defense.

exact business model, software-defined defense is the only thing that can be

When investors look for UK Defence AI (thanks to the Sovereign AI Fund launch yesterday), ALRT will be one of the only.

Are there any social psychologists on this thread who can explain why this poster refuses to post in English?

This American arrogance is reflective of the US President, it's Foreign policy and it's individual citizens it would appear.

Absolutely no respect for individual countries culture, language or customs.

This arrogant Trump supporting Yank simply refuses to post our company correctly.

It's breathtakingly ignorant.

hood then Defense Holdings has the code to bring about soverign stability. We are at the first floor of

Bonga, agree 100%.

Yesterday's announcement was never going to involve Defence Holdings, but so many speculators expected it.

As Buffett states, the stock passes wealth fromvthe impatient to the patient.

You could add, from the ignorant to the intelligent.

Or from the yank to the Brit!!!!

Theexang

War Footing for the UK budget and d-fens holdings technology corporation is primed.

You are getting worse.

Matador, it's Pound cost averaging, Defence Holdings is priced in pence.

There's no need for the definite article, it's 10 Downing Street, not the 10 Downing Street.

Why all the American English syntax?

Finally, intelligent investors knew there would be absolutely NO mention of Defence Holdings in the announcement.

Why, because Defence Holdings as I posted out yesterday evening, is much further down the procurement path with the UK Government than those micro incubators that were mentioned.

Theexang

Rachel Reeves warns other budgets may be cut to lift defence spending.

cannot handle a 3% GDP defense pivot alone. Defense Technologies.

So yesterday, you were complaining that posters simply sought to irrigate individuals.

It was explained to you that you are the main cause of such irritation.

There are your 2 examples.

This American arrogance is breathtaking.

For once, correctly name this company.

Muldoon, why would there be?

klein, will see, future tense.

******.

Theaexan

Just shows what this webiste is all about. Trying to get people to bite. On reflection it is quite sad really. I include myself in that as well.

Well, a human post for once rather than your American AI generated rhetoric.

You arecmain instigator of trying to get people to bite by refusing on a daily basis to even spell the company's name correctly.

You constantly post about Defense Holdings when you know fine what the ticker ALRT is Defence Holdings so you deserve every single bit of vitriol coming your way.

You refuse to engage in discussion or debate.

You refuse to answer any questions presented

Short answer: no, not a concern at this stage—and arguably expected.

Here’s how to interpret it properly.

Tech Funding News

IFA Magazine

UK’s Sovereign AI Fund names 7 startups it’s supporting in its first batch. Here are the details

AI firms pioneering drug discovery, cheaper supercomputing and more get first backing through UK’s Sovereign AI

Today

Today

1) What the fund actually is (important context)

The £500m Sovereign AI Fund is not a broad sector funding programme—it’s essentially a state-backed venture capital fund targeting:

Early-stage to scale-up AI-native companies

Areas like foundation models, compute infrastructure, biosciences, agentic AI �

Tech Funding News +1

Ticket sizes typically £1m–£20m with compute access (GPU hours, etc.) �

Sovereign AI

It’s designed to solve one specific problem:

➡️ UK AI startups struggling to scale commercially �

Computer Weekly

2) First cohort = very early-stage / pure AI

The first batch includes 7 startups, mostly:

Deep tech / research-heavy AI firms

Not listed companies

Not defence primes or holding companies �

WIRED

That’s key.

This is venture-style seeding, not strategic defence procurement or late-stage funding.

3) Where Defence Holdings sits (likely mismatch)

Without naming them directly, based on what you’ve said previously:

Defence Holdings is likely:

Later stage (or at least public market facing)

More defence/security platform than pure AI lab

Potentially integration / application layer, not core model builder

That puts it outside the sweet spot of this fund’s first wave.

4) Defence is relevant—but not necessarily via this fund

The government explicitly sees AI as critical to national security �

Tech Funding News +1

But funding routes for defence-linked companies tend to be:

MOD contracts

Classified programmes

NATO / security innovation funds

Larger strategic procurement

Not early-stage VC-style allocations like this.

5) The real signal to watch

Instead of “were they named?”, the smarter questions are:

Are they actually an AI company, or just AI-adjacent?

Do they have proprietary models / IP, or just applications?

Are they positioned for government procurement, not VC funding?

If Defence Holdings were in this first list, it would actually imply: ➡️ They’re still seen as early-stage / unproven, which may not be bullish.

Bottom line

No mention = not negative

This fund is too early-stage and too AI-core focused for most defence plays

Defence Holdings’ upside (if it materialises) will likely come from:

contracts

partnerships

strategic funding, not this vehicle

So the American AI bot has returned.

I'm sure full AI rhetoric will recommence tomorrow.

Retirment so y9u think they've bottomed out?

I've been trading Rolls-Royce recently.

Bought at £10.94 sold at £12.93p.

I'm hoping to rinsexand repeat.

Para, thank god for ChatGpt.

Asimplein milestones set by whom, you?

Wako, in your own eloquent language, please explain why Andrew Roughan, the highly regarded specialist in AI, left Plexal to join a busted flush?

Surely not to receive 142 million worthless share options.

It doesn't seem logical Andrew's decision to accept the position of CEO at Defence Holdings.

Beep, I agree re reate.

Any contract, any projected revenue and this could double immediately.

Swerve, I've never understood traders, I've absolutely no idea as to how you can know when to buy and when to sell.

I'm a fundamental investor who simply analyses a company, looks at it's products, competitors, presence, revenue, gp, np etc.

I bought Rolls-Royce at 70p, sold at 12 .93p,

Bought Empire Metals at 5.73p, still holding

Holding here at an average of around 4.20p.

Yep, I'll hold long until 15p and then reassess the fundamentals.

Thats £12.93p by the way