Member Info for Cevodniya

I agree 100% asxa LTH who can actually spell Defence Holdings.

You however have pumped this stock daily and have constantly posted about the importance of April 16th, Andrew's appointment 15 days before the £509 million spend.

You have without remorse pimped abd pumped and pumped this like a relentless troll and now you are backstabbing into a LTH.

You are a piece of work.

The playbook for Defense Holdings (ALRT) needs adjusting.

we know Defence Holdings is the intended recipient, even if the cheque hasn't been

I've never ever met or seen communicate, an investor who is incapable of spelling a Company correctly, even in one paragraph.

You are starting yo panic.

Hoe do I know.

Well before today, you've been ramping this stock dsily,constantly repeating how important the 6th was.

Now you are subconsciously believing that Defence Holdings will not be mentioned, so now you are psychologically conditioning that there won't be a mention and this normal and to be expected.

You are now being disingenuous.

THEEXANG This is the ultimate bull case for a Sovereign AI player like Defense Holding.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12187837

Is there a reason why you are behaving like you are?

Why have you charged the company's name?

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12187837

Https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12187837

Theexang, please explain why you have not only decided that you don't like software licence so you've decided to say software license.

But the company is listed as Defence Holdings.

Explain why you refuse to spell it as it is registered and as it trades.

Why?

Theexang now I understand the problem.

You are using a US AI to generate your pists which is why it's spelling Defence in American English.

It's simply impossible for you to be so blatantly ignorant, post after post.

Read your posts, it's impossible to not spot all the Americanisms, caliber instead of calibre, center instead of centre, defense instead of defence.

Why can't you proof read and corect.

In Nato there are only 2 acceptable languages, French and British English.

In a previous existence, I worked at both GCGQ and a Nato intelligence fusion centre and onba daily basis i translated US intelligence be it DIA, CIA, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine origination into British English.

Is it asking too much of you doing the same?

As i posted earlier, if stated revenue of £130 million is achieved by 2030, then applying a standard 10x-15x P/E that would equate to a capitalisatioj without further dilution of between £1.3 billion and just under £2 billion.

That would suggest a share price of 56p at £1.3 billion and 87p at £2 billion.

I think a 66x return would satisfy most investors.

Theexang

Defense Holdings is currently at the Palantir

If they do, Defence Holdings is the only

Seriously what is wrong with you?

In 50 years of investing, I've never ever known anyone ramp a share as much as you do with this.

It's as though you are PR for Defence Holdings.

Of course, if there is a full announcement on Thursday 16th and this company doesn't get a penny, you'll spin it in a positive wsy.

You never ever talk financials, that concerns me.

I'm solely heavy here because ofcthe new CEO, his experience, contacts and his number of share options.

I'm investing in him.

Willy, I'm not referring to spelling, you obviously don't understand.

I'm referring to the usage of US English on a Uk share, listed on a UK exchange.

What is it that you can't grasp?

The irony is that this company only exists to achieve UK sovereignty and independence from US software.

Why the constant use of American English?

Explain.

Bluegrass, I've been in Empire Metals for over 2 years and every mining stock has a Messi on them.

It's how their brain works

The guy on EEE is noramper, all he has done for 2 years is hypothetically highlight potential problems, from tonnage amount,wanting measured as opposed to indicated, purity, concentrate, capex ,opex, lassondre curve, even aboriginal possible burial ground.

Every point has progressively been answered as the project evolves.

All the time, questions are kicked down the road constantly.

Yet he's buying shares every month.

Notgot, they are not spelling mistakes, that's the point.

He is deliberately posting in American English, actually changing the name of a UK listed company.

Yet, he keeps stating that the UK needs sovereignty over it's AI environment, independent of the US.

Why then, does he insist on using US English?

It's a simple question.

Company (Defense Holdings.), he , really.

I wonder if he can spell the company that employs him?

You never ever talk financials do you?

Theexang

He sat at the center of, nope, he sat at the centre

He identified that Defense Holdings , again you've changed the name of our very company.

He joined because Defence Holdings, now it's back to it's correct name.

I agree 100% but constantly repeating yourself won't make it happen.

Let's get a contract signed with guaranteed revenue.

Let's generate the desired annual revenue of £130 by 2030.

Rhat would imply a capitalisation of £1.5 billion, a minnow in global tetms and only on a P/E of around 10 but without dilution a share price of 65p.

That's the future that I see.

Theexang so have you now formally changed our name?

for Defense Holdings (ALRT). really Defense???

Tier-2 Defense Prime. Again unbelievable

London-listed Defense firm, seriously?

Walks into the Ministry of Defence, well done, spelt correctly.

Try harder.

I actually believe now that this guy doesn't have one original thought in his had.

There's never any financial aspiration, revenue, potential capitalisation, nada, nunca.

He simply curs and pastes others writings and he can't even be bothered to read them before posting.

It's very poor to be fair.

Ste, it's mot being petty.

It's a UK company, listed on a UK exchange, attempting to leverage independent, sovereign AI independent of the US and some yank is arrogantly refusing to use sovereign English and constantly posts using American English.

It's pathetic.

I would post in the US about a US company using original British English.

That would be condescending arrogance of an unacceptable nature.

Theexang

Here we go again with no proof reading of your fut and paste.

Do you ever post anything that's ypur original thoughts?

Ever?

The first line, contracting and defense, spelt wrong again.

When Defence Holdings, correct spelling this time

Like drone defense, incorrect spelling again.

From defense stakeholders, again incorrect.

The center, seriously the center, its the centre.

Why won't you explain why you are fo8ng this?

Why?

Theexang

He wouldn't have joined if he didn't see a clear path to at least the middle tranche.

I'm very concerned that you think this middle trench of options at 3.45p is some kind of goal.

Dear me, if that's the height of his ambition, 43 million at 3 45p.

Surely, he's looking at £1 plus.

£142 million is absolute peanuts gor a CEO of a massive AI company.

Ste

Seriously, how can you be taken seriously when you can't even spell the name of the company correctly?

It's simply pathetic that an individual who wants UK independence in AI from the US, constantly writes using American English.

Unbelievable.

Ste, here he is again,

if defense holdings

He knows the company is DEFENCE HOLDINGS but he won't use British English

Why?