Member Info for cbaron

C'mon Joe, give us a clue. I couldn't at the first time of asking, nor at the second.

It could be the gas that Just 15 is talking about or someone had sprouts for lunch.

If RY says somethings is going to happen at a particular time or is imminent, just assume he's suffering from wind........he may as well be!

MD,

Ah! That old one!

In Europe then? Even worse! Still in your jimjams close to lunchtime! In the US having breakfast in the middle of the night and in Oz Frosties with a nightcap?

I'm sure you'll put me right.

All in jest ;-)

Just catching up on an amusing day.

007 at the helm, MD still eating his Frosties at gone 9.30am, Henners must have been smoking weed at just after noon, confident that the two fat lads (heavy hitters) have been a success, so much so that he's still forecasting £1 per share. Sushi is still spouting ****e in a bid to draw the unwary into an ill-advised investment. AT's getting tetchy as MD is winding him up and Mikewoz appears to be being ageist.

Another great day had by all and not a whiff of discourse about anything remotely relevant.

Have I missed anything?

Great to be in AMC :-)

Sushi,

Good to see that you're keeping the ramp flag flying.....until, that is, the wind changes. A volatile few days, I suspect, that leaves you confused. I'll wager it wouldn't take much to do that.......... ;-)

Naivety abounds TDT. Current business tactics are already making my skin crawl.....................

Prontaprint? ;-)

Thanks TD2 - very interesting video.

A different ball game when you're several hundred km out into the Russian Far East.

Sushi,

Your tactics are abundantly clear, they were when you were making commentary on the way up and we can all now gather that you've sold and are attempting to talk it back down to 'rinse and repeat.

If this is as good as you can do as an influencer, then I feel for you.

Good luck with your strategy, but be a good chap and save us the tedium of your commentary.

Noloss,

I agree with your first statement, but even then, as interesting as they are, the numbers can only be predicated on what we know. The problem is that there is much that is unknown including the most recent (actually not too recent anymore) drill results and the not yet published financial studies arising partly therefrom.

As to the second, I agree with that too in that RL is unusually getting involved in speculation about the motives of AH - who knows what they are? We cannot be sure of anything at the moment as again we lack information and background.

What I do agree with is RL's apparent view that the NRR association was completely unnecessary. For me it simply takes the business so far off piste and away from its whole reason for being. Stick to what you know - I nearly said 'good at' but that is yet to be proven. Some may view it as diversification, my view is that it is a complication which may need to be unravelled in any future financing arrangements, or worse may be a complication too far which may put off potential investors, partners and financiers, as it appears to align the business with one potential partner in Glencore (not to be sneezed at, some may think) but perhaps closes other potential options and avenues.

What we most certainly do need is information, as without it, the rest is pure speculation howsoever well researched, calculated and informed .

Henners,

Filtering remains an option, though persuasion that mindless repetition of information available to all at the top of these pages is perhaps wasteful of space, when there are interesting, informed and well-researched posts to be read.

As you say each to their own, but I'd prefer not to keep reading a commentary. There are many more similarly pointless comments, but perhaps the some most often repeated relate to what the MM's may or may not be doing with the SP and how being 'out over the weekend' might be disadvantageous . However, I think the prize goes to 'Buys are showing as sells', usually by someone keen to tell us that it is their buy.

Good luck to all investors whatever your position and strategy and whatever your level of investment. There's a long way to go with AMC. We should stick together as investors, but let's at least keep the airways interesting.

Some may consider this contribution to be mind-blowingly boring too. Each to their own! ;-)

The point is that nobody is interested in your personal position - you might consider ISA investment by the way, to negate CGT.
Equally, nobody is interested in your continuous price commentary - we all have access to all the information you requote.

Sushi,

Boom! Ooops, sorry, the price has gone down. Silly me!

What you need is an airship to pull the price back up again.

;-)

You are sounding more and more desperate by the day.

DB,
I completely 'get' where you're coming from and no end of advice will stop wild dreams from separating a man from his hard earned cash. Such is the nature of the majority of AIM style opportunities that it attracts a certain type of 'investor'. Minerals exploitation appears to attract the most extreme of these, and before I go on, I must admit that I'm as guilty as many. We don't see it as roulette exactly, rather the support for Davy Crockett and a slightly mad bet that he'll discover the new land on the wild frontier and build a secure homestead before he's eaten by the Bears. DYOR - not sure that it really helps much, for the most part. TYOCAP (toss your own coin and pray) might be more relevant.

I often find your posts come with a legitimate health warning, and that's fair enough, but there are none so blind as those that cannot see and there are also none so desperate as those who are b*lls deep and quietly praying for salvation, whilst espousing only the virtues and ignoring the bear they absolutely know is lurking around the next tree.

No judgement on either part.

Each to their own. ;-)

GLA

DB,
Seems like you've been watching an early showing of Christmas Carol this afternoon and have decided to role play.........now which character might that be? I wonder? ;-)

Don't forget all that extra Nickel and Copper, precious metals, rock, clay, wood, snow, ice................all to offset the dilution.

Not forgetting the Aussie iron ore, savings on Director's salaries...........even a few left over drill bits............

Endless possibilities to add value ;-)

Champagne and Oyster service, experience and competencies at Jellied Eels prices will do nicely............all backed by a big fat PII policy! ;-)

Champagne and Oyster service, experience and competency at Jellied Eels prices will do nicely..........with a big fat PII policy on the side! ;-)

All smells fishier than Haytesbury's office.........and it's located above a Fishmonger's shop!!!!!!!!!!!!

Once again no background information and leaving us all to join the dots.

Having looked at the Haytesbury website, they do have appear to have appropriate AIM and sector experience. Could be worse. I'd prefer to see a reasonable outsourced service rather than an incompetent RY appointee.

........with welcomes like that, is it any wonder new contributors might think twice about getting involved here, generating an overarching sense of apathy.

I'd hadn't exactly noticed that you are the font of all knowledge Sparticus. Is 12 your age?

???

etank,

You are absolutely right. I've been a strong critic for many years, all the way back to when RY considered he needed to send us an RNS to confirm that he'd filled the fuel bowser with red diesel and the mess cabin fridge with pizza.

Drill results financial strategies, funding and take-off agreements? Who needs 'em? An experienced corporate financial advisor, an M&A man, nah! A set of robbing bas**rd financiers, Crede et al? Yes, we'll have some of them. As we all know, I could go on, and justifiably so.

The difficulty around these boards is who to take seriously and who not. We have some great contributors and I would name Sasa, Red and TDT amongst them. We also are beset with groups of LTHs who can see nothing wrong with the board, not to mention the hear today gone tomorrow mob that are after a quick buck, do no research and talk bo**ocks - we have a raw fish eater around here today who appears in the latter mould.

The majority of shareholders here are PIs represented through Nominees, mine's HSBC. The best way forward, it seems to me is to get sufficient people together with the same Nominee and attempt to make waves through them. They after all would have voted in the recent debacle, whatever it was and however it came about.

When we ask for information and updates, I honestly believe that the board often haven't a clue what to do or what to say, they certainly cannot pick adequately experienced and relevantly qualified co-Directors and nor can they spot a good deal for shareholders - my jury is out on the iron ore deal.

Just a few thoughts to demonstrate you are not a voice in the wilderness.

Good luck

cb