Member Info for cbaron

09.56
....and when did you last post on the PANR board, such that you have such an expert view?

08.33
"they have lost all resemblance of self control re: emotions....ridiculous."
A bit rich from that particular source!

09.58
Genuinely sorry to hear your news - puts life into context. A few shares and the debate around them pale into insignificance.
Take care and good luck.

00.33
What a nerve...............from the bottle to God. Hypocrisy of the highest order.

12.10
Call him out for some smart arz comment, question his understanding and this is what you get back.
An attitude which pervades the whole 'believer' group.

10.40
Past performance is a key factor in determining future outcomes unless you can identify and implement different approaches, attitudes and strategies.
...and so what are they, perhaps you might explain?

8.46
"A project may often require unforeseen expenditures to get off the ground"
Agree that there are potentially unknown risk factors in any viability exercise and calculation of NPV, however, the Jade article highlights many KNOWN risks and expenditures which mean it is highly unlikely to get off the ground - we don't need anymore unknowns.
Heads in the sand once again, or is it more intention to mislead?

GS,
Re-read 23.47 and ask yourself if your words, 'childish', 'pathetic', 'sad', 'tiresome', 'ignoramous' and 'unfortunate' might also apply to it.

See also my post Wed 12.15
I think a cash raise through share issue, to enable us to go it alone for another season, is preferable. Don't raise more than you need now at the current SP, do it in stages, if you need to.
If the 2022 drill provides what we hope for, then I'm hopeful it will be the last cash raise as it will attract investors/purchasers. It will at least increase the SP to a new level and if a further cash raise is necessary it will be at a higher SP and a relatively smaller dilution.

Rab,
Many thanks for sharing.
What an extraordinary article. I'm not sure how many pairs of rose-tinted spectacles you would need to wear all at once to rely on Jade being a viable deliverable - and that is by their own admission in many quotes from their own most recent Plan of Development - their fourth. I think you have actually been kind in not quoting some of the more damning references.
I think it is fair to say that reliance on Jade to deliver value to 88e would be ill-conceived, to say the least.

As I said, 'Moving On...'

23.21
The matter in question was the drilling application and rig selection and the repetition, not the auction results.
Your usual clarity of thought appeared a little off. "no worries" was entirely unclear.
Moving on..............

23.19
It was neither work nor an idea, it was simply a document copied from the public domain. Semantics.

No worries? I was actually backing you up.....and, by the way, the timing of the posts in relation to Brom's last evening doesn't actually back up your argument.
And before some smart ar*e points out the obvious.....no, we don't agree on everything. ;-)
With you Villa01...........FFS!

15.54
What an execrable trouble-making moron!
The post I've seen on ADVFN is exactly the same as the one Scot posted here and takes no credit for information which is actually already in the public domain.

20.28
Not the brightest!
Look up the meaning of plagiarising. Try 'repeating', if anything. This, after Brom was thanked for the contribution of what, after all, is information in the public domain.
It seems all you're interested in is picking a fight, demanding answers to your own questions whilst ignoring those of others and being a complete sycophant on this BB.
Another warrior like the dragon? Heaven help you! Go off and count your cash - you've done well, or so you tell us?

08.17
Rab,
Not the sharpest knife in the drawer in spite of his own protestations to the contrary.
"I don’t know if you know but DW knows who Ddraig is."
I suspect there are quite a few people who might also wish to know who he is, given the insults he serves up.

10.05
Is that wishful thinking on your part? Not brave enough to say anything too controversial yourself? Just orchestrate others to do so?
Clearly, alignment to the neighbours is not a prerequisite for serious questions being asked here.

22.28
I started this thread on the basis on a post that clearly had been deleted before I had a chance to read it. I still don't know what it said.
What I do know is that it has caused considerable consternation on the part of 'the believers'. It must therefore have been very worthy as an alternate view.
And so, Moda, I do not see your point. Once again, your post makes no sense.

06.44
Blimey, if you're already sitting on 569% profit, I'm not sure you need advice from anyone. Had I been aware of that significant piece of contextual information, I would simply have suggested that you keep doing what you've been doing. You must have had exactly the same conundrums at various points along your journey so far. Whatever your thought process was back then clearly worked for you.
Your next steps are all about your personal risk profile. Only you can answer your points 1, 2 & 3.
FWIW, my own view is that we may see a small dilution if the company elects to raise funds for the next drill and IMO this is preferable to a FO which gives away too much of the ultimate prize. If we see dilution, I'm confident that this will be more than compensated by a rising SP leading up to the drill. Should the drill be the success we all hope for, then I think there are potential further SP value multiples from here. Should the results be so good that a suitor (even better suitors) appears then the sky is the limit. We also have potential early wins from short term production which brings positive cash flow - never a bad thing.
All IMHO, your money, your choice. Good luck!