RE: Reflection5 Nov 2024 10:17
Thanks for the insight, Rocky.
I understand that AK said at the AGM that the exchange had forced us to remain suspended from trading and it wasn't what the company wanted (though of course I couldn't dial in due to the comms shambles that ensued, yet again).
If it's the exchange and/or nomad insisting on the continued suspension, what would change their mind now, I wonder? Effluxion of time? Surely they just go by their rulebook. Let's say that they do now direct the company to resume trading, are they then forcing SAVE to walk away from the potential deal? Upon what grounds? It seems different for the tiddler Wildcat apparently.
Not much of this is making much sense to me.
You're right that the deal is super-high-risk of course. But if oil is flowing and we secure the concession for a suitable price, then the payback period might well be rather short.
One thing is clear, management still think the fish is on the line and worth the effort to reel in. And Knott and Clarkson are hardly naïve.