Helikon26 Nov 2022 09:05
The problem with equity swops is that they do not actually increase the aggregate institutional ownership,if I understand it properly.
So Helicon has taken the economic interest (all upside or downside) in the stock from a third party investor in exchange for an agreed interest payment (no idea how much).When Helicon closes the swap the economic interest reverts to the third party.
So who is the third party-this is the easy bit, has to be La Mancha,Glencore or Orion as they are the only parties with over 8% shareholding-the size of the Helicon swop.I am going to guess it is either La Mancha because they have a large position and want to reduce a bit of equity risk in return for income, or Glencore because their stake is strategic ahead of a bid.They do not care what happens to the share price in the next year, but instead can earn some decent income knowing that they own 9% ish of HZM very cheaply and can call it back when they are ready to bid.Say hypothetically Helikon swapped at 97p and the swop is closed at 200p,then Helikon walk away with 103p profit less interest paid to Glencore and Glencore retain all the original stock ate whatever average price they have.
This is my understanding of the swop arrangement-otherwise known as a CFD or Contract for Difference,but if I am technically wrong on any point please correct me.