Scancell founder says the company is ready to commercialise novel medicines to counteract cancer. Watch the video here.
The graph does look alarming but we're only about 1% down today atm, only about 3.5% down on the week. I loaded up a little tomorrow despite my nerves; the objective information seems reliably positive despite my subjectively fluttering heart!
The apparent reluctance to get and stay beyond 1p shows that the market is driven by human beings making decisions that are not entirely objective. Why is 1p a barrier but 0.93p wasn't? Humans clearly prefer to focus on simple numbers rather than a balanced assessment of the scale of the opportunity balanced by the risks. On the bright side, once we get beyond 1p the next obvious sticking point is 1.5 or maybe 2p.
Maybe Raaydaar's investment strategy is all about assuming that the past 30 minutes of trading is a good guide to the next 30 minutes of trading. It's not a tactic that I'd be comfortable with, but maybe that's why they are sitting on piles of cash wasting time talking to us?!
Lew, can we try to avoid the imperialist stereotyping? We are not "dealing with Africa" we are waiting for news about a mine in Zimbabwe which is owned by a company based in Togo, about 4500 km away. The company and the mine have shown a lot of drive and commitment to get where it is with comparatively few delays. Do you think it would have happened more efficiently if we were "dealing with Europe" with a mine in the UK run by a company in Bulgaria? (I suspect there would have been many more delays and we would all be hoping to break even some time in 2027!)
You'll need a subscription to access the full article: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg25734311-100-why-were-trapped-in-short-term-thinking-and-how-to-take-the-long-view/
The article is based on the author's book 'The Long View: Why we need to transform how the world sees time.', (Richard Fisher is a journalist for BBC Future.)
I read an interesting article over the weekend about timeframe through which people operate. Among other things it noted that companies that focused on short term indicators (like share price, quarterly reporting, etc) generally perform worse than companies that focus on the long term.
The article gave me an explanation for why I dislike the continual chatter about what share price we'll hit today, this week, this month. It seems to me that George has been focused on years into the future and (rightly, in my opinion) not paid attention to pleasing those who want the sp to double this year with less consideration for what might happen in 5 or 10 years.
I read Acker's posts a bit differently to you RatBoy. They seemed to me to be a much-needed reminder to not get too carried away with evangelical fervour. This board seems to keep itself fairly level, not giving in to the strange emotional pressures that money seems to have on the Western Capitalist soul!
Not me Acker, I'm not excited, not remotely excited. I'm not checking this board every 10 minutes. I'm not constantly monitoring the Prem twitter account. I'm not doing sums in my head about when I can retire.
#ImALyingBastard
I'm still pretty new to this AIM lark and it just occurred to me to wonder when dividends are likely to start being paid. I don't imagine it'll be for a couple of years as I'd assume we'd want profits reinvested for a while yet - any thoughts anyone?
The ban is effectively on unprocessed lithium. I'm not sure what minimum level of processing is required but ensuring some in-country processing means adding to Zimbabwe's national capability as well as increasing the GDP and the tax revenue.