Member Info for Bozi

Redknight - this forum does not lend itself to quoting so I'll try my best to answer your points.

"Please give me one iota of evidence of that. You say you own Solgold but you keep talking it down when you actually know nothing to support your views."

You mean to tell me that you can't see what is going on? Are you so clueless? The evidence includes but is not limited to:

- the employment of individuals that are not sufficiently experienced to lead a company trying to develop a tier one asset. The appointment of Vujcic into the top role is as damning an indication of this as you will get.

- selling the SolGold Canada shares to Jiangxi at a very cheap price in a desperate attempt to provoke some sort of reaction. That is the very definition of a firesale.

- failing to update the market on the deliverables for the Franco & Osisko agreement, instead opting for the pivot towards "escalation and ExploreCo" with a concerning lack of detail being shared in relation to both.

"Do you know how ridiculous that makes you?"

I'll never be as ridiculous as you. Some of remember all of your antics down the years. Deramping, buying, ramping, selling and deramping. Not to mention the crowing over how many shares you and your wife hold, have bought and your trading commentary, all under the guise of "helping others", or helping yourself rather.

"I look forward to chuckling with glee when that unsubstantiated opinion fails to materialise..."

Why will it fail to materialise? The shares are trading sub 8p. This elaborate new plan for ExploreCo is due in as little as 2 weeks time. If it coincides with a sale of Cascabel at some point during the quarter or second half of the year, how do you suppose the shares are going to trade 600% higher in a matter of weeks? You've been around long enough to know how the markets work - name a company that has delivered that sort of performance so quickly.

To put it simply, if the market believed that new management was going to deliver the SP would be back at 10-12p now. Instead, we have lots of PIs trading round the edges. I feel for Rodney and his list of shareholdings.

"Give us just one piece of evidence to support that...(SOLG are struggling to progress the asset)"

Red - they've sacked the CEO, they've raised a slug of funds at a bargain price that vastly undervalues YOUR valuation of the company. They haven't updated us on the geotechnical drilling and TSF plans.

How many more pieces of evidence do you need?

"But those more bullish metals prices have NOT been reflected in mining shares except for a few.

You dissed me for choosing a period for compariosn but you are doing EXACTLY the same by choosing shares that have performed well recently while SOLG has languished..."

Idiotic. I countered you when you said that SOLG was acceptably priced down here based on the performance of BHP. I simply refuted your feeble attempt to justify the poor performance of the shares through a super majo

No, I'm not, because again that is another arbitrary timeframe selected by you.

Everyone can twist data to suit their argument. It's not clever.

My concern, which I believe should be everyone's concern now, is what the SOLG investment case looks like going forwards.

The Jiangxi news added 30% and stopped us slipping back into the 5s, but we need good news in Q2 if this company is going to get over the line.

Argentina sorry, the company with projects in Peru was left off my list but is also performing much better than SOLG over the last 12 months.

Rubbish Red. It's nothing like comparing SOLG with Nvidia and you know it.

All three are companies with projects in southern America. One has projects in Ecuador, one in Peru.

Your careful selection does nothing for objective thinking. It just enforces your own beliefs which you then look for evidence to support.

Sometimes, give someone a pass or enter into constructive debate instead of attempting to nullify any view that isn't your own.

Red - I'm not interested in other miners. I'm invested in SolGold.

For every company you can point to being at lows I can point to companies being at highs or close to.

Collective Mining, Solaris Resources, Aldebaran Resources, etc etc.

All three of those companies have more in common with SolGold than SolGold has with BHP.

SM - I think that was just Jack believing he could move the world on his own and choosing to do it under his current alias.

Imagine thinking he could morph into a panda and his persona wouldn't stick out like a sore thumb...

Who is recommending this balloney from Panda?

Panda - you say you won't get out of bed for less than 74 but you're frantically ramping rubbish to try and fool investors into buying your stock.

Is that because you don't have any confidence that the company can find a truer value itself?

Rubbish again Fort.

I've been critical of the company for three years but supportive of their attempts to try and make progress to derisk the asset.

I've been pessimistic about certain events granted.

You only have to look at the share price in the midst of much more bullish metal prices.

If this company had done much right in the last 3 years then it wouldn't be trading at £220m. It would be back at a £800-1bn valuation.

It seems the real players in the market share my objective view and not your fluffy rubbish.

That's why we're effectively firesaling Cascabel whilst Jiangxi are showing some interest. Those at SOLG towers know they are the final play.

lovely ramp there fort. hope you feel all fuzzy now you've posted that regurgitated ****** for the millionth time.

you can keep referring to the "benchmark market rate" as much as you like but you fail to acknowledge:

1. jurisdiction discount, which is likely to increase if noboa doesn't get re-elected

2. the clear and obvious fact that solg are struggling to progress the asset

3. the other shenanigans which are clearly in play with this company.

you're the one that needs to dream on, but that would be dangerous as you already do too much

Ahhhh here we go. Noront again.

If that all you've got Fort? How many times does it need to be explained to you why Noront was Noront and why it shouldn't be assumed SOLG will play out like Noront?

There's no deramping. But it's important to set expectations. Nobody who visits this board will be able to claim outrage when this asset/company goes for a relative pittance, and it will.

*12 years

9p was the highest price Add, and folks want to tell me they'll buy the rest at 154p?

Gordy Bennett there are some special types on here.

Mike - what makes you think anyone cares how much the company has spent over the years?

That isn't how business works.

If you assumed SOLG has spent on average $50m for each of the last 12 months raised through one of the various financings then were up to $600m. That means 30p represents a 50% ROI.

Not ideal or anything to crow about but where we're witnessing a scenario where certain stakeholders are desperate to exit, it's a price that will be acceptable to many and likely pitched by someone who is being engineered a clear run at the asset.

You ramp away Mike, but it won't matter a jot.

Really is a care and maintenance jobby now this.

Good news will need to be imminent and plentiful.

CIPA, maybe a certain major holder dipping into the market.

Make your peace with 30p folks and a few shares in ExploreCo if we're lucky. All done in late Q3 latest I reckon.

Pierre will be happy. He'll see a route to a return without having to find $650m.

Fort - some changing of tune re Darryl. You've never ever called him rock solid and class before, quite the opposite in fact.

You change with the wind.

You're not wrong Rodney. I've been saying the same for the last 5 years and folk did nothing but rubbish me.

You're not wrong because I'm not wrong. Only recently have folk started to realise.

Why would Scott be moved aside to get the CGP shares sold? Makes no sense.

We've likely run around on the Franco Osisko cash, they have told us to pull the trigger and we're using the CGP shares to bridge us for another 6 months.

Sounds as simple as that. I can't see why Scott would have any involvement in this Jiangxi transaction. It has happened under Vujcic's watch.

Obvious is staring us in the face.

Add - the strategy was sensible/logical /rational but did we make enough progress towards it? I don't think we did. The company was always telling the market what it was planning to do but never made enough progress towards those goals.

The agreement with Franco/Osisko needed to be the line in the sand where the gear shifted up but it never quite happened.

We're seemingly no closer to having geotech drilling completed and a plan for the TSF. That isn't a particularly high bar to unlock the 2nd tranche of funds.

I have no real confidence in Vujcic. As much as I hate to say it, it pushes us back towards a firesale IMO.

Roge - your definition of British is idealistic and it doesn't match the legal definition, which the Southport killer met.

As for dual nationality, someone can become a national when they have citizenship. They can gain citizenship in a number of ways, such as applying for a passport.

Picking up a couple of your other points:

1. You're keen to waggle your finger at anyone who calls someone "far right" but at the same time you're happy to throw around the woke label at anyone who doesn't agree with your views. Both sides are as bad as each other. Maybe quit the double standards and then there is a conversation to have.

As for your challenge of choosing somewhere to live, I reckon I'd get along fine out in the West Indies. Nice relaxed lifestyle. Lovely weather most of the time.

Jezz - detaching your own political views for a moment, and even with your background in mind, are you seriously trying to suggest there was any merit in the direction Truss and Kwarteng were trying to move in?

You only have to take on board the latter's public admission recently.