RE: Question14 Nov 2019 07:54
Captain Stanley, it can be argued that your own continued posting here after asserting you woudn't (having publicly exited) is more indicative of an 'agenda'. However, getting involved in such a discussion is non productive, imo.
I certainly don't state that a limited placing is off the table, as indeed it may be the route to go deemed most appropriate by the Management team. Where I differ from your perspective and perhaps a more 'balanced' one seeing as I'm currently holding and not looking to re-enter a position, is that other avenues towards funding may also be available and progressed.
We have a tangable asset in Heron to borrow off and indeed the possibility of a partnership agreement, as discussed on this BB previously and explicitly referenced by Mike Buck.
My (hopefully balanced) argument is that there certainly isn't the singular route to funding that you suggest and even if said route was progressed, it may be at a premium to the prevailing price and given the much stronger position PeteoMatad are in.
I think we all agree that the prospects for PetroMatad going forward are extremely good, so I certainly do understand your interest and comittment to posting here. However, the route to funding isn't so conveniently one sided imho and accepting that any of those outcomes (even the one you promote) may indeed transpire to be the case.
Atb & have a lovely day