RE: A ‘performance bond’ in place3 Jun 2019 09:38
R_Dunc, I didn't specifically mention you as think this is a wider issue on this BB, however, when he was 'aggressive' or 'evasive' with your questioning, did you communicate that in full to the BB along with the issues that prompted such a reaction from him.....or did you just focus on the 'positive spiel' he was feeding out to shareholders, through you?
I'm not 'finger pointing' or any such silliness aa you suggest, but am being consistent in my endevours, to view this investment objectively. I put Art Milholland in the same camp as people like David Lenigas and Jim Melon.....those who know will understand how that can be viewed, hence will always look at what he says from a very critical perspective.
The placings been arranged at 0.10p and at 20% dilution, isn't a trifling matter as some (including Art) would suggest - it's still a fairly significant proportion of the company, albeit not a large return in Cash.
I'm hoping it will be enough to 'facillitate' what is required and also with the view that, if nothing was imminent, why would the parties to the placing get involved in such with another due shortly - perhaps to stave off a larger loss if the Company went under??
Or perhaps the aforementioned likelihood of part of the placing funds being able to action further developments...??
Obviously, a lot of speculation which only an official company RNS will clarify. However, in the meantime I'll continue looking at this onjectively rather than being emotionally attached to the highly questionable utterances of the CEO.....and unofficial mouthpieces that he no doubt tries to manipulate.
Atb