Member Info for bonker99

Melt-up ;)

https://twitter.com/bonker_99/status/1354798281499537411?s=20

Game-on for Silver girlfriends ...

https://imgur.com/VuZTK8b

https://twitter.com/bonker_99/status/1354729975044333568?s=20

Gold:Silver ratio is 73 right now - let's pencil in a reasonable 50 for a handy-looking-on-the-chart-target of $37.

I do :)

They nearly pulled it off too :)

IIRC there's 250x more paper Silver than there is physical - could make $GME's 20x look like a blip if enough people/money went for it - $50 on the Silver chart already from back in the day, it could happen ...

I've thrown a few more into the pot - ya never know ...

Is physical Silver the next $GME?

Keep em peeled ...

We couldn't ask for more than that - onwards and upwards ...

NOMADs are there for a purpose, they always know the score. When they choose to let the wider public know is another matter. Sometimes it pays better to only let, y'know, certain "types" know then the news drops after they've all got their ducks aligned - it is what it is and that's the same for every share on AIM ...

Presumably the guy or gal who just trousered 500k shares at 3.476p is feeling pretty comfy with how things are shaping up ...

:)

https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-009-1710?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true

Tie in the " Fourth money laundering directive ((EU) 2015/849)" reference to Brexit as you see fit of course ...

FYI - I've seen TR1's turn up a year after the fact so like everything else on AIM/LSE, TR1's are usually used to influence, not inform, the "market" ...

Sure but this is AIM and AIM has ways ...

Four accounts @ 2.9% each, whether, in reality, they belong to the same "beneficiary" or not, precludes anyone fessing up to their c11% holding.

Always interesting when "someone" holds a big chunk but it's not been made public of course - there'll be a reason for that ...

Those are interesting numbers for sure - timing is everything in this game of course and very many got it wrong re VR/AR in 2016 (not just punters!) but perhaps 2021 really is the year - time will tell as per.

I'm also intrigued - the already large, and possibly continuing/growing, major interest here of big West Coast USA money types does capture the imagination and I can't help wondering who they may be fronting for either ...

Anyway, the 3.75p caught my eye in the context of the long-term chart:

https://ibb.co/fNT17s1

"Also, we should remember that Davis Partners have an option to buy at 3.75p for $20m that will be another source of massive dilution"

Well there's an interesting number (3.75p) - when was that arrangement set?

Still giving :)

This came a long way from the 7p of yore eh?

Well done all those who held on and ignored the de rigeur pro derampers back then ;)

Good stuff.

I think some might need to think why very many people who are somewhat better informed than Joe Schmo, i.e. people actually working in the care/medical industries, are giving these untested "vaccines" a very wide berth - they'll be far more aware of the long-term damage that can be done by such untested stuff than the general public.

IMO if you're 60+ then you've got a decision to make but if you're younger than that then you're out of your mind to even consider taking them until at least a couple of years from now.

As referenced below, the pharma giants have been given a complete legal pass on any comeback whatsoever for these "vaccines" - nuff said IMO.

Morning - yes it is.