Member Info for bon_scott

"Debenhams is one of the UKs best known brands and profitable as well "

Accounts filed in February 2024: £732k loss. Stop lying, tradey.

"I don't think Kane is actually engaged much any more, but Kamani certainly is now. "

Says it all, really. Kane still wanted a £1M bonus depite doing very little. As for the big man himself, seemingly took the imminent collapse of the company to get his attention, and again, wanted a £1M bonus as motivation.

Highly respected, heavy-hitting investor like him must surely have received a sincere response from the board, yes?

He also wrote in to the LSE about the level of manipulation, to which they surely launched an investigation came down hard on the offenders, and duly updated tradey on the outcome.

So why won't he share all of this insight with us little people, Sam?

Come on Tradey, better explain yourself. What's the reason now for thit turkey's performance??? We've had market manipulation trotted out for years now. Obvious to everyone except yourself that it isn't that. Can't blame Hexam either. Looks like you're out of excuses.

Tradey getting all irate again. For someone who portrays that there's nothing to fear from a Shein IPO, he gets mightily worked up about it all. Shein sell pretty much the same tat as Boohoo, but much cheaper, and that's what the kids all want. Plus, Shein often deliver very quickly as cited by SuperheroSam, while Boohoo palm off your parcel to Evri to lose, drive over, launch into muddy puddles, etc.

All manipulation. Couldn't possibly be due to dismal business performance, not making any money, board mismanagment and self-interest. Tradey's shocker of a decision to go all-in around the high 300s looks rather silly now. Surprised he hasn't blamed Hexam for the current share price malaise - he seems to get most of tradey's ire at the moment.

Excellent, I'll file this in the pipe dream folder, along with all the other twaddle.

"Bon Scott, two lying posts clearly in breach of LSE rules

Reported"

And the mods have done absolutely zero, such is your form for constantly reporting things you simply don't like.

Actually, you did catch me lying. Bang to rights. I lied in saying that the leadership had formulated a winning strategy.

Just remember, every vote to retain this shower was a vote for continued losses and continued value destruction.

Well, I'm sure the senior management have devised a winning strategy during their shareholder-bankrolled jolly to Bodrum.

And he has the gall to label other users as "arrogant". Absolutely staggering.

"Decent the moderators finally removed BFD's not so quite factual post trying to allude to posters being blocked from posters."

Good, sensible moderation, combatting (at least some of) the utter garbage that he spouts. Conman-style behaviour at the end of the day, which needs to be stymied.

"Failed to answer the question per usual Spidey.

Actually it's you trolls who try to use Shein as the bogeyman. It's a strange moral compass

If it's so great why wont you invest if it does IPO.

If it's such an unstoppable machine that you rate so highly, surely it's a no brainer for you"

Having trouble controlling your temper as usual tradey.

Actually, I see very little fanboi support for Shein from anyone on here, as you portray. Just facing facts that they won't just "go away". You pumpers do tend to fantasise about that scenario an awful lot.

"Bon Scott is that the same Simply Wall street that says the current sp is 36.7% below their fair value

Strange you don't mention that."

Spoiling for a fight this morning, eh tradey?

So, you're all made up because SimplyWalSt projects that the share price has the potential to hit... wait for it... the mid fifties fot be considered fair value. How's that going to help your high 300s average?

Well, let's look to the future. Might report positive earnings sometime after 2027 according to SimplyWallStreet.

What I don't understand though, is why all these returned clothes aren't generating mega profits for the business right now. After all, a certain master investor on here said they would.

"Bfd, on the contrary.

You insinuated the 'shorter' was closing their position due to the positive ONS data, weren't you?

What does a 'shorter' do when they close their position Bfd?"

Absolutely right, Crawshaw. Tradey just makes it all up as he goes along, and presents it as indisputable fact.

Doesn't even have the humility to admit that Debenhams made an accounting loss in the last financial reports.

News just in...

"The irony is the board have car crashed the share price.

It's all rather sad the desperation from certain PIs stuck in this"

They just refuse to see the obvious, Spidey.

"Tight security on the door by the looks of things.... So tight the security guard didn't know what an agm is."

Just pick the biggest one and go ape on him. The rest will fall right into line.

Oh dear, your reading of sarcasm is truly TWWTful. For your information, these are (almost word for word) phrases used by Bfdinvestor and his previous guise, Trading4good, during his multi-year tyrannical policing of the board. Do try to keep up.