Member Info for bon_scott

"What does paying off £100m do to the SP?"

Could help. A lowered debt load would alleviate concerns over ability to repay, and the balance sheet in general. I would certainly take that positively. Then there's just the next challenge of paying off the other two hundred million with all the profits they don't make.

Never ending attacks by tradey against Hexam. Fragile ego, that one...

""Price anchoring"?

The new reporting fad ...didn't pipe just mention 22p earlier in relation to "charts" and thus it got reported."

Oh, yes, this price anchoring business. That's exactly the same line that Trading4good used to trot out at anyone who dared to offer an opinion. Interestingly though, he never once said the same if someone "anchored" a higher price. Hilarious that he denies the bleeding obvious.

So tradey, this mystical LSE rule about not being allowed to "price anchor" as you express. Where is it in the LSE terms and conditions? This is the second time I've asked you.

There's our tradey sniping away at Hexam as always.

Probably blames blames him for the the recent cliff-edge share price performance too.

"Yep unsubstantiated price calling is anchoring and breaches LSE rules. "

Where is the actual clause in the LSE terms and conditions?

Well, that's Deutche proven absolutely right.

Antalya is quite nice, as are some of the Black Sea resorts. I'm sure a company "war cabinet" can be convened there.

Oh, Simon, you've got the two pumpers absolutely raging. Climbing over each other to get to you. These two have absolutely everything riding on Boohoo's recovery (or survival, depending on how things go), so naturally they can't stomach any other opinion than theirs. Notice their inability to be civil, how in typical conman style there's always an excuse for each and every disappointment (of which there have been tons), pulling in any old irrelevant stat from God-knows-where and God-knows-when, and how they cunningly keep shifting the "imminent recovery" timeframe further and further out.

Superb. You only need a twelve bagger to break even now.

"And to think how it was shouted down on here Bon.

Is very odd dismissing Barclays who have been excellent here lowering each and every broker forecast and all seemingly get hit...(hard facts)

Latest one nearly arrived"

There's a reason why TipRanks rates this particular analyst so highly. She knows her stuff.

"You should "I repeat" back history barclays calls (many) on here on the way down as opposed to trying to shout folk down. "

He just can't bear it that other people might think differently. The electronic equivalent of the misbehaving, screeching child with fingers-in-ears.

Wow, bid price in the 28s.

Barclays... what do they know, eh?

"No it’s not. Good on you if you have done your own ‘business accounts’ but it’s clear you don’t have much knowledge of accounting for big companies and what it all means.

I just wish you would stop misleading people with your supposed knowledge."

Well, doing his taxidermist business accounts once annually doesn't exactly qualify him as much of an authority. Just makes it all up on the fly.

"Is today a good day to average down?

Shall i sink £10K of RR profit into Boo?"

Sink being most appropriate. The ultimate value trap.

So explain yourself Tradey, what's up with the sudden lurch downward, seemingly for no reason? Pesky market makers doing a little tree shake (yes, a fifteen percent tree shake, if you believe it) to flush out weak holders?

"He ain't wrong about managment. They a god awful, JL has overseen terminal decline, has put none of his skin in the game and has one of the best salaries. Needs new vision, the brands is an ASOS dupe, he has Primark thinking without the bricks and mortar."

Well said, LDLD. This has been my gripe all along. Rewarded massively for abject failure.

You aren't authorised to give investment advice, tradey. Completely against the rules of this website. Reported.

He *IS* Trading4good. Doesn't even attempt to mask it. Thousands of posts trying to control the board narrative, abusing others, all while the share price slides down, down, down, ever further down.

Come on then, what's a lie? And don't try to count a tired old fashion alliance with Chesney Hawkes as your example of good "news".

"Who is bracing for another massive loss Bon Scott "

We all are, Tradey. This company doesn't do good news, you may have noticed.

I have however stumbled on a winning strategy, which is to do the exact opposite of what you do, such is your power to call it wrong so consistently, for so long.

"Next have just reported on a quarter we know nothing about for Boo. Other than that website views have been really encouraging relative to the competition"

Is that it? That's your comeback? An uptick in digital window shopping is what you're clinging to? Give me strength. The company has lost £160M this year, £90M the year before, and everyone (including yourself) is bracing for another whopping loss come the next results.

Oh, and by the way, I presume that when you say: "Next have just reported on a quarter we know nothing about for Boo", your use of "we" means your little group of pumpers, right?

Finally, you've never produced any evidence of your own shareholding despite being challenged by dozens of people. A never ending stream of hypocrisy from you, tradey.