Member Info for bon_scott

"Bon_scott - I prefer to stand with Mike - he is no (sports direct) Mug."

I agree with you, Quakerjon. He's absolutely brutal. If a move is made, it will not be pretty for anyone involved, unless they bought in at the same levels as Frasers or less.

Pierre101, the Boohoo debt "default" you mentioned yesterday: Do you have an article link to share? Let's prove or disprove it.

I just love how the pumpers get themselves all worked up. Be lucky to get a bid of 60p tops. One sixth of your average prices, boys...

"The article was posted multiple times on Friday and over the weekend

Here it is again for anybody who hasn't seen it. It's just the usual unnamed sources, surprise surprise.

Absolutely nothing is "looming" "

But you don't actually know that this is the article that pierre101 is referring to, until he responds. He could be referring to the MT Newswire article or something similar on there. Why don't you approach it that way instead, instead of just trying to censor? It just looks like you're trying to cover something up, and denying anyone a chance to even discuss it. If it's baloney, then fair enough, everyone should point it out.

"Your source"

Exactly. If a link exists and can be provided, that should make everything clear.

"Most of the debt matures in mid 2026 so it is hardly looming.

Got to laugh at some of the nonsense posted here, not to mention Pierre/pedro"

Couldn't we just allow him to share the link, so we can make up our own minds, instead of trying to shut down the debate, oh fuhrer?

"It says default is looming....That is very concerning.....and lenders will know that....very concerning...."

Wow, if true. Do you have a link, pierre101?

"Pierre101, 3 posts in total and two of them removed."

Getting a bit worked up there, tradey. You can always tell, because you start spouting mistruths. Two of his Pierre's posts just happened to be in a large thread which coasty and yourself got removed.

"Wishful thinking has never produced results for this share price and will continue not to do so. realism is needed,and honesty is needed,with pretend top ups and boasting having no place in finding value and profits.Only continued losses will be the result of such behaviour.Loss making and facing huge competition and huge problems this problematic and clumsily led company will only serve the greedy directors at the cost of investors.Please be warned......Heed this advice and do ,please do not listen to heavily invested and struggling investors trying to hoodwink others to invest.Reality should be looked at......"

Ouch. Tradey and his underling coasty will be mightily upset hearing the truth, what with them both in year four of "This time next year, Rodney".

JP Morgan aren't overly optimistic on the upside either. 37p target. Fact.

I guess they're just comically wrong too.

"Southcoast i presume you mean the one that referred to "fudge"

Disgusting that Sam even considered writing something like that"

But you were perfectly happy to ridicule others on multiple occasions, whipping up accusations of 1) alcoholism and 2) having a stammer. Not exactly shining examples of compassion, are you?

"Comical, in what parallel universe are we anywhere near mid 2026?

Get the deal done early as interest rates drop, would appear to be a sensible thing to do"

Couple of weeks ago, you were denying that there was any need to focus on renegotiate the finance. No chance of difficulties you implied, despite the refusal to extend £75M of it. Nothing to see you implied. Now you're demanding immediate action. Changed your tune quickly...

#HexamIsInnocent

#BeBetterTradey

"What ‘VALUE’ does anyone bring with regards discussion on the company itself?"

Maybe if the company generated something of value, there'd be something to talk about.

"Hexam,

It's strange that you are unable to ever criticise the three not so wise flying monkeys

What value do you think Spidey Street for example brings?"

There we go, back to bashing Hexam. Knew it was only a matter of time.

So the man from Del Monte isn't actually in the Caribbean, doesn't actually have a Rolex, and might just be a bit of a Walter Mitty?

Tenerife at best.

""Boohrider"is all you need to see as to the utter desperation when battered by this"

They're both desperate. All of their investments dissolved away to barely anything through their own stupidity. No wonder they've retreated into a world of fantasy, the two of them. Coasty reckons that returned clothes will somehow restore profitability. Tradey has absolutely no idea how Boohoo will get out of this, but he's sure that everyone else is wrong.

"Imagine, trolling a board where people are set to lose all of their money. "

Not really sure what you're dribbling on about, tradey. All Sam has said over the last few days is that the board should concentrate on their core business if prosperity is to return, no gloating whatsoever. Bit like the shower running this outfit.

Is your third identity BearleyThere, tradey? It would explain a lot...

Another rip-roarer of a day for Poohoo. Nothing to do with the mismanagement of the company, soaring year-on-year losses, hit-and-hope allocation of capital and use of has-been "brand ambassadors" to hawk the tat. Instead, it's all manipulation by dark forces.

Remember peeps, if you disagree, you're just wrong. Completely wrong. Barclays are just plain wrong (failing organisation desperate to boost its flagging profile, I'm sure), as are all other institutions who don't agree with the pumpers.

"The real feather spitting will start as soon as the recovery starts....."

.... as he moves through year four of his lock-in, ninety percent down. Just waiting for some more of his bingo phrases:

Big Mike. Boom time. UMAR!!! Any day now. Surely. I have a Rolex, honest. Coiled spring. Please. Tradey, you said this was a cert.