Member Info for bon_scott

"It's a conditional statement and a question, not advice, as you well know. "

Again, Trading4good, the LSE rules are clear. You must never give investment advice, which you clearly did despite masking it as a pure, innocent question. Please refrain from doing so now and in future. You are in breach of the terms and conditions and the moderators have been notified. It's highly likely they're monitoring you anyhow, on account of your continued ban evasion.

And what's more, considering the knee-slapping idiocy of your investment decisions, nobody could be blamed for rejecting your commandments outright.

"If that's the case Bon Scott, why not sell your supposed shares and invest in a business you have some time for. "

You, Trading4good, are not authorised to give any kind of investment advice by the terms and conditions of this website either overt or implied. Reported to LSE for breach of terms. Hopefully the mods do the sensible thing.

"Bailey is clueless he won’t do anything until the Fed does. He’s way out of his depth"

I rank Bailey and the boohoo board around the same level. As inept as each other.

"Spidey who was the only person sad enough to be posting here Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights?

Trying taking a long hard look in the mirror"

Always spoiling for a fight, our tradey is. Stuck in this turkey, probably forever.

Honestly, who racks up a single annual loss representing 38% of the entire company market capitalisation? Furthermore, who expects a bonus for doing so? The weird and wonderfull world of Poohoo.

"Southcoastboast going to biff anyone who doesn't agree with his 650sp"

Windmilling everyone.

So, it's AGM week... let's vote these chancers out. No enrichment scheme or mega bonuses for abject failure. Starvation rations for the board until they turn the business around. I hope Frasers wipes the floor with them.

"But then you have the dilema of which is more pathetic. Having multiple accounts or there actually being a living human being(s) who are carrying the torch for a troll.

Both equally pathetic. What is strange tho is Sam continually refers to "tradey" yet has apparently only been a member here since March. No poster of that name has posted here since then as far as I'm aware.

Could be they are all one and the same."

Come off it, Tradey, your posting history as Trading4good was as visible as it was notorious, to both members and non-members. Thirteen thousand posts, easily one third being the most appalling abuse of others. Everyone knows that Trading4good was your username before you were banned, and you returned under Bfdinvestor (including the mods). Cringeworthy to see you referring to yourself in the third person. Same goes for "Jeremy", your other alter ego.

"I’m buying today to celebrate Daytradenovice’s ban here. Bargain price for BOO. IMHO DYOR GLA"

It's been a so-called bargain for an entire year now, oh wise one. Gone absolutely nowhere, while the board lines their pockets.

"The British Retail Consortium (BRC) has defended its decision to allow Shein to join amid concerns over treatment of workers. "

Just fud propaganda from a failing association, desperate to boost its flagging profile. Move along, nothing to see here.

"Folks are wise to boohoo, this can't be pumped and dumped, it's time as a growth share is over"

One of those zombie shares, a lifestyle vehicle, run purely for the benefit of the board. The existing enrichment scheme already uses dilution as a means. We should have a prediction competition for the number of placings to come.

"Funny to see daytrade extolling the virtues of a supposed non trading trader and two uninvested single board heroes"

Whether he no longer posts through choice or a ban, one thing is undeniable: He did an absolutely sterling job of exposing and countering your arrogance and dogma for what it is. Look at the state of the company and the share price, for God's sake. The fact that you're still banging on about him tells us that he must have really, really, gotten to you.

Thanks John, great contribution.

Tradey, did Debenhams make a profit or a loss, per the most recently filed financial reports?

"I agree with Hex, he (presumably a he) has summed this up perfectly. No director buys for goodness how long shows they have lost confidence and it just seems to holders they are trying to milk everything they can out of this company. Another great big lawsuit to deal with, Never good news holding BOO."

Tradey will absolutely flip when he reads this.

So true though.

"Just shows how unregulated AIM is, this time last year average daily volume was over 8m, yet no questions are asked!"

Yeah yeah, all manipulation. Nothing to do with abysmal business performance, and definitely nothing to do with your idiotic all-in purchase in the 400s.

"Wow that's a new all time low, way to go market destroyers! "

Still clinging to the manipulation fantasy, instead of the much more obvious chronic mismanagement. Still, never mind the losses and debt... website visits are a tad higher, and I'm sure a link-up with another love islander will bring back the good times.

"PLT website views up 30% in May, where is their major market Bon Scott? "

Wow, that's epic. The greenest and most succulent of green shoots.

"Ref the below, how has the short percentage changed in the last year? Is the last remaining large shorter still trying to make a profit? "

You don't actually have a comeback. Only deflection. You do realise it after all.

"Absolutely comical Bon Scott, maybe stick to editing text to suit your agenda? "

You seem upset, tradey. It won't do you any good.

"So you don't count the growth of Debenhams as a green shoot? You don't count the turnaround of the brands in H2 as a green shoot? You don't see the opening of the USDC as a green shoot? "

Nope. Debenhams is loss-making, as per the latest filed reports. Which you know. The profitable brands are swamped by the loss makers. The US DC cost a fortune and is underperforming. Last year's losses alone represented 30% of the company's market capitalisation.

Might be some improvement in 2029, as coasty has indicated.